• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Unsolicited Pics and Sexual Scripts: Gender and Relationship Context of Compliant and Non-consensual Technology-Mediated Sexual Interactions.未经请求的图片和性脚本:顺从与非自愿的技术介导性互动中的性别与关系背景
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 19;12:673202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673202. eCollection 2021.
2
The Three Dimensions of Unsolicited Dick Pics: Men Who have Sex with Men's Experiences of Sending and Receiving Unsolicited Dick Pics on Dating Apps.主动发送阴茎照片的三个维度:男同性恋者在约会应用程序上发送和接收主动发送的阴茎照片的经历。
Sex Cult. 2022;26(3):834-852. doi: 10.1007/s12119-021-09920-y. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
3
Technology-Mediated Sexual Interactions, Social Anxiety, and Sexual Wellbeing: A Scoping Review.技术介导的性互动、社交焦虑与性健康:一项范围综述
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Jul 29;12(8):904-932. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12080066.
4
Gender Differences in Sending Nude Pictures and Videos Across Multiple Relationship Contexts in the Adult Norwegian Population.挪威成年人群体中,在多种恋爱关系背景下发送裸照和视频的性别差异。
Sex Cult. 2023;27(2):570-590. doi: 10.1007/s12119-022-10028-0. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
5
[Sexting as a risk? : On consensual and non-consensual distribution of personal erotic pictures using digital media].[发送色情短信是一种风险吗?:关于使用数字媒体自愿和非自愿传播个人色情图片的问题]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Sep;60(9):1034-1039. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2595-9.
6
Gender Differences in the Emotional Response and Subjective Sexual Arousal Toward Non-Consensual Sexual Intercourse: A Pupillometric Study.非意愿性性交中的性别差异:瞳孔反应与主观性唤起的研究。
J Sex Med. 2020 Oct;17(10):1865-1874. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.018. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
7
Women's and Men's Reactions to Receiving Unsolicited Genital Images from Men.女性和男性对收到男性主动发送的生殖器图片的反应。
J Sex Res. 2021 May;58(4):512-521. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1779171. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
8
Perceptions of Sexual Script Deviation in Women and Men.女性和男性对性脚本偏离的看法。
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Feb;48(2):631-644. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1280-x. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
9
How Are Consensual, Non-Consensual, and Pressured Sexting Linked to Depression and Self-Harm? The Moderating Effects of Demographic Variables.同意、不同意和被迫发送色情短信与抑郁和自残有何关联?人口统计学变量的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 5;18(5):2597. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052597.
10
Jealousy, Consent, and Compersion Within Monogamous and Consensually Non-Monogamous Romantic Relationships.在一夫一妻制和双方同意的非一夫一妻制浪漫关系中,嫉妒、同意和补偿。
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Aug;48(6):1811-1828. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1286-4. Epub 2019 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Proclivity, Enjoyment, and Acceptance of Non-Consensual Intimate-Image Distribution Among Greek University Students.希腊大学生中非自愿亲密图像传播的倾向、喜好和接受度的预测因素
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Aug 4;15(8):150. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15080150.
2
Motives for Technology-Mediated Sexual Interactions in Committed Romantic Relationships: Using the Approach-Avoidance Theoretical Framework in a Multi-Grounded Qualitative Examination.忠诚浪漫关系中技术介导的性互动动机:在多基础定性研究中运用趋避理论框架
Arch Sex Behav. 2025 Apr;54(4):1459-1479. doi: 10.1007/s10508-025-03088-4. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
3
Image-Based Sexual Abuse Perpetration: A Scoping Review.基于图像的性虐待行为:范围综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec;25(5):3981-3998. doi: 10.1177/15248380241266137. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
4
Strategies to develop an LGBTQIA+-inclusive adolescent sexual health program evaluation.制定一个包含LGBTQIA+群体的青少年性健康项目评估的策略。
Front Reprod Health. 2024 Mar 22;6:1327980. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1327980. eCollection 2024.
5
Technology-Mediated Sexual Interactions, Social Anxiety, and Sexual Wellbeing: A Scoping Review.技术介导的性互动、社交焦虑与性健康:一项范围综述
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Jul 29;12(8):904-932. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12080066.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of sending, receiving and forwarding sexts among youths: A three-level meta-analysis.发送、接收和转发色情短信在青少年中的流行率:一项三级元分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 7;15(12):e0243653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243653. eCollection 2020.
2
Women's and Men's Reactions to Receiving Unsolicited Genital Images from Men.女性和男性对收到男性主动发送的生殖器图片的反应。
J Sex Res. 2021 May;58(4):512-521. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1779171. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
The Prevalence of Sexting Behaviors Among Emerging Adults: A Meta-Analysis.青少年群体中色情短信行为的流行率:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 May;49(4):1103-1119. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
4
Sexting and Mental Health Among Young Australians Attending a Musical Festival: A Cross Sext-ional Study.音乐节上的澳大利亚年轻人的性行为和心理健康:一项跨性别研究。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Aug;22(8):521-528. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2018.0671.
5
I'll Show You Mine so You'll Show Me Yours: Motivations and Personality Variables in Photographic Exhibitionism.我为你展示我的,你为我展示你的:摄影暴露癖者的动机和人格变量。
J Sex Res. 2020 May-Jun;57(5):597-609. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1639036. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
6
Bridging the Theoretical Gap: Using Sexual Script Theory to Explain the Relationship Between Pornography Use and Sexual Coercion.弥合理论差距:运用性脚本理论解释色情制品使用与性强迫之间的关系。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 May;36(9-10):NP5215-NP5238. doi: 10.1177/0886260518795170. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
7
Prevalence of Multiple Forms of Sexting Behavior Among Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.青少年多种形式的发性行为的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Apr 1;172(4):327-335. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314.
8
Reasons why undergraduate women comply with unwanted, non-coercive sexual advances: A serial indirect effect model integrating sexual script theory and sexual self-control perspectives.本科女生顺从不受欢迎的非强制性性侵犯行为的原因:一个整合性脚本理论和性自我控制观点的系列间接效应模型。
J Soc Psychol. 2018;158(5):603-615. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1427039. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
9
Sexting among singles in the USA: prevalence of sending, receiving, and sharing sexual messages and images.美国单身人群中的“性短信”行为:发送、接收及分享性信息和图片的流行情况。
Sex Health. 2016 Jul 29. doi: 10.1071/SH15240.
10
Unpacking "Sexting": A Systematic Review of Nonconsensual Sexting in Legal, Educational, and Psychological Literatures.解析“发色情短信”:法律、教育和心理文献中非自愿发色情短信的系统综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017 Dec;18(5):593-601. doi: 10.1177/1524838016659486. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

未经请求的图片和性脚本:顺从与非自愿的技术介导性互动中的性别与关系背景

Unsolicited Pics and Sexual Scripts: Gender and Relationship Context of Compliant and Non-consensual Technology-Mediated Sexual Interactions.

作者信息

Courtice Erin Leigh, Czechowski Konrad, Noorishad Pari-Gole, Shaughnessy Krystelle

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 19;12:673202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673202. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673202
PMID:34349699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8326365/
Abstract

Technology-mediated sexual interaction (TMSI) refers to any partnered interaction that involves sending or receiving self-created, sexually explicit content using communication technology (e. g., sexting, cybersex). Most research on TMSI assumes that experiences are desired and consensual. However, it is likely that some people do not desire all their TMSI experiences but consent to them anyways (), or experience TMSIs. People also engage in TMSIs with different types of partners. According to the traditional sexual script (TSS), other-gender attracted women and men's non-consensual TMSI experiences should differ overall and depending on the relationship context of the experience. The goal of this study was to examine the role of sexual scripts in other-gender attracted women and men's non-consensual and compliant TMSI experiences with committed romantic partners (CRPs), known non-partners (KNPs), and strangers (Ss). Women ( = 331) and men ( = 120) completed an online survey with questions about lifetime prevalence of experiencing seven types of compliant and non-consensual TMSIs in each relationship context. Results of mixed ANOVAs revealed significant interactions: overall, more participants reported compliant TMSI with CRPs. More women than men had received a non-consensual TMSI from someone they were not in a committed relationship with, and more men than women reported sending non-consensual TMSIs to a stranger. Tests of unpaired proportions suggested that the prevalence of sending and receiving non-consensual TMSIs was discordant in the KNP and S contexts: both women and men received more non-consensual TMSIs from KNPs and Ss than the other-gender reported sending. Our findings suggest that gendered sexual scripts are evident in some, but not all, aspect of other-gender attracted women and men's compliant and non-consensual TMSI experiences.

摘要

技术介导的性互动(TMSI)是指任何涉及使用通信技术发送或接收自行创建的、露骨的性内容的伴侣互动(例如,发送色情短信、网络性爱)。大多数关于TMSI的研究都假定这种体验是双方自愿且期望的。然而,很可能有些人并不期望他们所有的TMSI体验,但无论如何还是同意了,或者经历了非自愿的TMSI。人们也会与不同类型的伴侣进行TMSI。根据传统性脚本(TSS),异性吸引的女性和男性的非自愿TMSI体验在总体上以及根据体验的关系背景会有所不同。本研究的目的是考察性脚本在异性吸引的女性和男性与忠诚浪漫伴侣(CRP)、已知非伴侣(KNP)和陌生人(S)的非自愿和顺从的TMSI体验中的作用。女性(n = 331)和男性(n = 120)完成了一项在线调查,其中包含关于在每种关系背景下经历七种类型的顺从和非自愿TMSI的终生患病率的问题。混合方差分析的结果显示出显著的交互作用:总体而言,更多参与者报告与CRP有顺从的TMSI。与没有忠诚关系的人相比,收到非自愿TMSI的女性比男性更多,而向陌生人发送非自愿TMSI的男性比女性更多。非配对比例检验表明,在KNP和陌生人情境中,发送和接收非自愿TMSI的患病率不一致:女性和男性从KNP和陌生人那里收到的非自愿TMSI都比异性报告发送的更多。我们的研究结果表明,在异性吸引的女性和男性的顺从和非自愿TMSI体验的某些但并非所有方面,存在性别化的性脚本。