Wang Li-Ting, Lin Wei-Ting, Lai Chih-Cheng, Wang Ya-Hui, Chen Cheng-Hsin, Chang Yen-Teh, Chen Chao-Hsien, Wang Cheng-Yi
Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Hospital, Chiali, Tainan.
Department of Orthopedic, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2021 Jul 15;12:20420986211027096. doi: 10.1177/20420986211027096. eCollection 2021.
The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the clinical safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients.
The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from their inception until May 2020 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only RCTs evaluating the risk of adverse events (AEs) for ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparative treatments for acute bacterial infections in adult patients were included.
Overall, four RCTs including a total of 2924 patients (1475 in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 1449 in the control group) were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of treatment-emergent AEs was 51.3% (748/1458) in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group, which was comparable to the control group, 49.9% [714/1430; odd's ratio (OR), 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91-1.25; = 0%]. In addition, no difference was observed between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and control groups in terms of the risk of serious AEs (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.93-1.61; = 15.5%) and the risk of discontinuing the study drug due to AEs (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55-1.33; = 0%). The rate of all-cause mortality did not significantly differ between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and control groups (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82-1.50; = 0%). The only exception was the risk of () colitis, where ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with the control group [0.72% (10/1376) 0.14% (2/1391), OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.23-11.97; = 0%].
Ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment is as tolerable as comparative treatment options for acute bacterial infections in adult patients, however it has an increased risk of infection. As a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam could be a safe therapeutic option for use in common clinical practice.
Ceftolozane-tazobactam is an effective antibiotic for the treatment of acute bacterial infections. This study conducts a meta-analysis to assess the clinical safety (side effects) of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients compared with other drugs. We extracted data from four randomized controlled trials, including a total of 2924 patients (1475 in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 1449 in the control group). The rate of treatment related adverse events (AEs) was similar in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group (51.3%) and control group (49.9%). There was also no difference in risk of serious adverse events, the risk of discontinuing the study drug due to AEs, and all-cause mortality. The only exception was the risk of colitis (a cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea), where ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with the control group. In conclusion, as a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam could be a safe therapeutic option for use in clinical practice.
本研究旨在进行一项荟萃分析,以评估头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗成年患者急性细菌感染的临床安全性。
检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库自建库至2020年5月的相关随机对照试验(RCT)。仅纳入评估头孢他啶-阿维巴坦及对照治疗成年患者急性细菌感染不良事件(AE)风险的RCT。
总体而言,荟萃分析纳入了4项RCT,共2924例患者(头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组1475例,对照组1449例)。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组治疗中出现AE的发生率为51.3%(748/1458),与对照组相当,对照组为49.9%[714/1430;比值比(OR)为1.06;95%置信区间(CI)为0.91 - 1.25;P = 0%]。此外,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组与对照组在严重AE风险(OR为1.22;95% CI为0.93 - 1.61;P = 15.5%)及因AE停用研究药物的风险(OR为0.85;95% CI为0.55 - 1.33;P = 0%)方面未观察到差异。全因死亡率在头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组与对照组之间也无显著差异(OR为1.11;95% CI为0.82 - 1.50;P = 0%)。唯一例外是艰难梭菌性结肠炎的风险,与对照组相比,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗与之相关的风险显著更高[0.72%(10/1376)对0.14%(2/1391),OR为3.84;95% CI为1.23 - 11.97;P = 0%]。
对于成年患者急性细菌感染,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗与对照治疗方案的耐受性相当,但艰难梭菌感染风险增加。作为一种新型广谱抗生素,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦在临床实践中可能是一种安全的治疗选择。
头孢他啶-阿维巴坦是治疗急性细菌感染的有效抗生素。本研究进行荟萃分析,以评估与其他药物相比,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗成年患者急性细菌感染的临床安全性(副作用)。我们从4项随机对照试验中提取数据,共2924例患者(头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组1475例,对照组1449例)。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组治疗相关不良事件(AE)发生率(51.3%)与对照组(49.9%)相似。在严重不良事件风险、因AE停用研究药物的风险及全因死亡率方面也无差异。唯一例外是艰难梭菌性结肠炎(抗生素相关性腹泻的一个病因)的风险,与对照组相比,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗与之相关的风险显著更高。总之,作为一种新型广谱抗生素,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦在临床实践中可能是一种安全的治疗选择。