Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Center for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research (ZIS), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0255594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255594. eCollection 2021.
Implementation of evidence-based care for heavy drinking and depression remains low in global health systems. We tested the impact of providing community support, training, and clinical packages of varied intensity on depression screening and management for heavy drinking patients in Latin American primary healthcare.
Quasi-experimental study involving 58 primary healthcare units in Colombia, Mexico and Peru randomized to receive: (1) usual care (control); (2) training using a brief clinical package; (3) community support plus training using a brief clinical package; (4) community support plus training using a standard clinical package. Outcomes were proportion of: (1) heavy drinking patients screened for depression; (2) screen-positive patients receiving appropriate support; (3) all consulting patients screened for depression, irrespective of drinking status.
550/615 identified heavy drinkers were screened for depression (89.4%). 147/230 patients screening positive for depression received appropriate support (64%). Amongst identified heavy drinkers, adjusting for country, sex, age and provider profession, provision of community support and training had no impact on depression activity rates. Intensity of clinical package also did not affect delivery rates, with comparable performance for brief and standard versions. However, amongst all consulting patients, training providers resulted in significantly higher rates of alcohol measurement and in turn higher depression screening rates; 2.7 times higher compared to those not trained.
Training using a brief clinical package increased depression screening rates in Latin American primary healthcare. It is not possible to determine the effectiveness of community support on depression activity rates due to the impact of COVID-19.
在全球卫生系统中,基于证据的重度饮酒和抑郁护理的实施仍然很低。我们测试了在拉丁美洲初级保健中为重度饮酒患者提供社区支持、培训和不同强度的临床方案包对抑郁筛查和管理的影响。
这项涉及哥伦比亚、墨西哥和秘鲁的 58 个初级保健单位的准实验研究将随机分配接受以下干预措施:(1)常规护理(对照组);(2)使用简短临床方案包进行培训;(3)社区支持加使用简短临床方案包进行培训;(4)社区支持加使用标准临床方案包进行培训。结果是:(1)筛查抑郁的重度饮酒患者比例;(2)筛查阳性的患者接受适当支持的比例;(3)所有咨询患者无论饮酒状况如何都接受抑郁筛查的比例。
550/615 名确定的重度饮酒者接受了抑郁筛查(89.4%)。147/230 名筛查出的抑郁阳性患者接受了适当的支持(64%)。在确定的重度饮酒者中,调整国家、性别、年龄和提供者专业后,社区支持和培训的提供对抑郁活动率没有影响。临床方案包的强度也没有影响交付率,简短版和标准版的表现相当。然而,在所有咨询患者中,培训提供者导致酒精测量率显著升高,进而抑郁筛查率升高;与未接受培训的患者相比,高出 2.7 倍。
在拉丁美洲初级保健中,使用简短临床方案包的培训提高了抑郁筛查率。由于 COVID-19 的影响,无法确定社区支持对抑郁活动率的有效性。