Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32(10):1218-1227. doi: 10.1111/clr.13819. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
To measure in vivo 3D accuracy of backward-planned partially guided implant surgery (PGIS) based on dental magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI).
Thirty-four patients underwent dMRI examinations. Tooth-supported templates were backward planned using standard dental software, 3D-printed, and placed intraorally during a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. Treatment plans were verified for surgical viability in CBCT, and implants were placed with guiding of the pilot drill. High-precision impressions were taken after healing. The 3D accuracy of 41 implants was evaluated by comparing the virtually planned and definitive implant positions with respect to implant entry point, apex, and axis. Deviations from the dMRI-based implant plans were compared with the maximum deviations calculated for a typical single implant.
Twenty-eight implants were placed as planned in dMRI. Evaluation of 3D accuracy revealed mean deviations (99% confidence intervals) of 1.7 ± 0.9mm (1.2-2.1mm) / 2.3 ± 1.1mm (1.8-2.9 mm) / 7.1 ± 4.8° (4.6-9.6°) for entry point / apex / axis. The maximum deviations calculated for the typical single implant surpassed the upper bounds of the 99% CIs for the apex and axis, but not for the entry point. In the 13 other implants, dMRI-based implant plans were optimized after CBCT. Here, deviations between the initial dMRI plan and definitive implant position were only in part higher than in the unaltered group (1.9 ± 1.7 mm [0.5-3.4 mm] / 2.5 ± 1.5 mm [1.2-3.8 mm] / 6.8 ± 3.8° [3.6-10.1°] for entry point / apex / axis).
The 3D accuracy of dMRI-based PGIS was lower than that previously reported for CBCT-based PGIS. Nonetheless, the values seem promising to facilitate backward planning without ionizing radiation.
测量基于口腔磁共振成像(dMRI)的逆向规划部分引导种植手术(PGIS)的体内 3D 精度。
34 名患者接受了 dMRI 检查。使用标准牙科软件对牙支持模板进行逆向规划,3D 打印,并在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)扫描期间置于口腔内。在 CBCT 中验证治疗计划的手术可行性,并用导钻引导植入物。愈合后进行高精度印模。通过比较虚拟计划和最终植入物位置相对于植入物入口点、根尖和轴,评估 41 个植入物的 3D 精度。将与基于 dMRI 的植入物计划的偏差与典型单个植入物的最大偏差进行比较。
28 个植入物按 dMRI 计划放置。3D 精度评估显示,入口点/根尖/轴的平均偏差(99%置信区间)分别为 1.7±0.9mm(1.2-2.1mm)/2.3±1.1mm(1.8-2.9mm)/7.1±4.8°(4.6-9.6°)。典型单个植入物的最大偏差超过了根尖和轴的 99%CI 的上限,但入口点没有超过。在另外 13 个植入物中,基于 dMRI 的植入物计划在 CBCT 后进行了优化。在这里,初始 dMRI 计划与最终植入物位置之间的偏差部分高于未改变组(1.9±1.7mm[0.5-3.4mm]/2.5±1.5mm[1.2-3.8mm]/6.8±3.8°[3.6-10.1°],入口点/根尖/轴)。
基于 dMRI 的 PGIS 的 3D 精度低于以前报道的基于 CBCT 的 PGIS。尽管如此,这些数值似乎很有希望在不使用电离辐射的情况下促进逆向规划。