Department of Medical Sciences, Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;156:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary bifurcations is an unmet issue. The BIFURCAT registry was obtained by merging two registries on coronary bifurcations. Three groups were compared in a two-by-two fashion: short-term DAPT (≤ 6 months), intermediate-term DAPT (6-12 months) and extended DAPT (>12 months). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), target-lesion revascularization and stent thrombosis) were the primary endpoint. Single components of MACE were the secondary endpoints. Events were appraised according to the clinical presentation: chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) versus acute coronary syndrome (ACS). 5537 patients (3231 ACS, 2306 CCS) were included. After a median follow-up of 2.1 years (IQR 0.9-2.2), extended DAPT was associated with a lower incidence of MACE compared with intermediate-term DAPT (2.8% versus 3.4%, adjusted HR 0.23 [0.1-0.54], p <0.001), driven by a reduction of all-cause death in the ACS cohort. In the CCS cohort, an extended DAPT strategy was not associated with a reduced risk of MACE. In conclusion, among real-world patients receiving PCI for coronary bifurcation, an extended DAPT strategy was associated with a reduction of MACE in ACS but not in CCS patients.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 治疗分叉病变患者的最佳双联抗血小板治疗 (DAPT) 持续时间尚未得到解决。BIFURCAT 登记处是通过合并两个冠状动脉分叉处登记处获得的。以二乘二的方式比较了三组:短期 DAPT(≤6 个月)、中期 DAPT(6-12 个月)和延长 DAPT(>12 个月)。主要不良心脏事件 (MACE)(全因死亡、心肌梗死 (MI)、靶病变血运重建和支架血栓形成的综合)是主要终点。MACE 的单一组成部分是次要终点。根据临床表现评估事件:慢性冠状动脉综合征 (CCS) 与急性冠状动脉综合征 (ACS)。共纳入 5537 例患者(ACS 3231 例,CCS 2306 例)。中位随访 2.1 年后(IQR 0.9-2.2),与中期 DAPT 相比,延长 DAPT 与较低的 MACE 发生率相关(2.8%比 3.4%,调整后的 HR 0.23[0.1-0.54],p<0.001),ACS 队列中全因死亡减少是主要原因。在 CCS 队列中,延长 DAPT 策略与 MACE 风险降低无关。总之,在接受 PCI 治疗分叉病变的真实世界患者中,延长 DAPT 策略与 ACS 患者 MACE 减少相关,但在 CCS 患者中则不然。