Department of Orthopaedics, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
J Pediatr Orthop. 2021 Oct 1;41(9):e763-e767. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001934.
New surgical techniques have challenged traditional guidelines for nonsurgical treatment in pediatric and adolescent distal forearm fractures. This study was performed to compare outcomes and costs between closed reduction with percutaneous pinning (CRPP) and closed reduction with casting in the treatment of complete distal forearm fractures in children 8 to 14 years old.
A retrospective cohort study was performed of 175 displaced distal forearm fractures treated with 2 different methods in the emergency department of a children's trauma center. One hundred and fourteen children were managed using CRPP. The remaining 61 were treated with closed reduction and casting. All patients had initial follow-up radiographs. The quality of reduction and the residual angulation in both the coronal and sagittal planes were recorded. Outcomes included the angulation after reduction, residual angulation at final follow-up, radiation exposure, total immobilization time, days absent from school, total costs, and postoperative complications.
The postreduction sagittal plane angulation was significantly lower in the CRPP group (P=0.037). While residual deformity between the groups at the 6-month final follow-up was not significantly different in either the sagittal or coronal planes (P=0.486, 0.726), patients in the nonoperative group received greater radiation than those in the operative group (P<0.001). Patients in the nonoperative group missed fewer classes and sustained lower costs (P<0.001, <0.001). The mean immobilization time in each group was not significantly different (31.4±4.4 vs. 32.8±5.9 d; P=0.227).
Although the postreduction quality was a little better and radiation exposure was less in the CRPP group, there was no difference between the 2 groups in angulation, total immobilization time, or complication rates after 6 months. The cost and time absent from school of patients in the nonoperative group was significantly lower than in the operative group. There is no clear advantage to CRPP treatment on outcomes. Therefore, closed reduction and casting is recommended in complete distal forearm fractures of children 8 to 14 years old.
Level III-therapeutic study.
新的手术技术对儿科和青少年远端前臂骨折的非手术治疗提出了传统的治疗指南。本研究旨在比较闭合复位经皮克氏针固定(CRPP)与闭合复位石膏固定治疗 8 至 14 岁儿童完全性远端前臂骨折的结果和成本。
对一家儿童创伤中心急诊室使用两种不同方法治疗的 175 例移位性远端前臂骨折进行回顾性队列研究。114 例患儿采用 CRPP 治疗,其余 61 例患儿采用闭合复位石膏固定。所有患者均接受初始随访 X 线检查。记录复位质量和冠状面及矢状面的残余成角。结果包括复位后的成角、最终随访时的残余成角、放射暴露量、总固定时间、缺课天数、总费用和术后并发症。
CRPP 组的复位后矢状面成角明显较低(P=0.037)。虽然在 6 个月最终随访时两组的冠状面和矢状面残余畸形差异无统计学意义(P=0.486,0.726),但非手术组的放射暴露量大于手术组(P<0.001)。非手术组缺课天数和费用均较低(P<0.001,<0.001)。两组的平均固定时间无明显差异(31.4±4.4 与 32.8±5.9 d;P=0.227)。
虽然 CRPP 组的复位质量稍好,放射暴露量较少,但两组在 6 个月时的成角、总固定时间或并发症发生率无差异。非手术组的患者费用和缺课时间明显低于手术组。CRPP 治疗在结果上没有明显优势。因此,对于 8 至 14 岁儿童的完全性远端前臂骨折,建议闭合复位石膏固定。
III 级-治疗性研究。