Suppr超能文献

缓解药物吸入器使用者的特征与哮喘控制:葡萄牙社区药房的一项横断面多中心研究。

Characteristics of Reliever Inhaler Users and Asthma Control: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study in Portuguese Community Pharmacies.

作者信息

Romão Mariana, Godinho Ana Rita, Teixeira Pedro M, Mendes Zilda, Bernardo Filipa, Teixeira Rodrigues António, Correia de Sousa Jaime

机构信息

Centre for Health Evaluation & Research/Infosaude - National Association of Pharmacies (CEFAR/IS-ANF), Lisbon, Portugal.

Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS)/3B's-PT Government Associate Laboratory, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

出版信息

J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Jul 30;14:943-954. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S315678. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

SABA overuse might indicate poorly managed or uncontrolled asthma and be responsible for poor health outcomes. The aim of this study integrated in new fourth multi-design SABINA+ pillar was to characterize the population using short-acting β-agonists for asthma and examine the patterns of its use among community pharmacy customers in Portugal, as well as identify characteristics associated with disease control and explore potential differences between GINA treatment steps.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted in Portuguese community pharmacies between 29 May 2018 and 15 August 2018. Participants were adults (age ≥18 years) self-reporting asthma diagnosis recruited in the context of a short-acting β-agonist dispense. A two-part questionnaire (pharmacist interview and self-administered) was used to collect information about sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, reliever inhaler use, healthcare resource consumption and self-reported disease control (assessed by the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test - CARAT). Descriptive statistics was done to characterize the study sample. After categorizing patients according to GINA steps, based on their therapeutic regimen, we performed an exploratory subgroup analysis to evaluate if there were any differences between such groups in terms of the variables collected. A logistic regression was used to identify the potential determinants of overall disease control.

RESULTS

Around 50.8% of patients were male, and the average age was 52 years old. Half of the patients never smoked, and 51.9% were employed. More than half of the patients report inhaler overreliance - purchasing more than 1 pack in 3 months (65.0%) or using the inhaler on more than 8 days over the previous 4 weeks (50.2%). Of the total number of patients in the study, 79.1% had poorly controlled asthma symptoms, and 78.7% had overall poorly controlled respiratory symptoms. We found statistically significant differences between GINA treatment steps in all sociodemographic characteristics (sex, mean age, education level, employment status); maximum number of SABA uses in 24h, CARAT score (total an asthma sub-score); history of exacerbations requiring ED visits or treatment with OCS for at least 3 days in the previous 12 months. Logistic regression revealed that patients reporting SABA use in more than 8 days in the previous 4 weeks and patients with at least 1 exacerbation requiring treatment with OCS for at least 3 days in the previous 12 months have greater odds of poor disease control [adjusted OR (95% CI): 2.6 (1.3-5.2) and 3.0 (1.3-6.6)].

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, it can be inferred that the asthma population using SABA is largely uncontrolled and uses reliever inhalers excessively.

摘要

目的

过度使用短效β受体激动剂(SABA)可能表明哮喘管理不善或控制不佳,并导致不良健康后果。纳入新的第四项多设计SABINA+支柱研究的目的是,对使用SABA治疗哮喘的人群进行特征描述,研究葡萄牙社区药房顾客中SABA的使用模式,识别与疾病控制相关的特征,并探索全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)治疗步骤之间的潜在差异。

患者与方法

这项横断面多中心研究于2018年5月29日至2018年8月15日在葡萄牙社区药房进行。参与者为在SABA配药过程中自我报告哮喘诊断的成年人(年龄≥18岁)。使用两部分问卷(药剂师访谈和自我管理)收集有关社会人口学特征、合并症、缓解期吸入器使用情况、医疗资源消耗和自我报告的疾病控制情况(通过变应性鼻炎和哮喘控制测试-CARAT评估)的信息。进行描述性统计以描述研究样本的特征。根据GINA步骤对患者进行分类后,基于他们的治疗方案,我们进行了探索性亚组分析,以评估这些组在收集的变量方面是否存在差异。使用逻辑回归来确定总体疾病控制的潜在决定因素。

结果

约50.8%的患者为男性,平均年龄为52岁。一半的患者从不吸烟,51.9%的患者有工作。超过一半的患者报告过度依赖吸入器——在3个月内购买超过1包(65.0%)或在过去4周内使用吸入器超过8天(50.2%)。在研究的患者总数中,79.1%的患者哮喘症状控制不佳,78.7%的患者总体呼吸道症状控制不佳。我们发现,在所有社会人口学特征(性别、平均年龄、教育水平、就业状况)、24小时内SABA的最大使用次数、CARAT评分(总分及哮喘子评分)、在过去12个月中需要急诊就诊或接受口服糖皮质激素(OCS)治疗至少3天的加重病史方面,GINA治疗步骤之间存在统计学显著差异。逻辑回归显示,在过去4周内报告使用SABA超过8天的患者,以及在过去12个月中至少有1次加重需要接受OCS治疗至少3天的患者,疾病控制不佳的几率更高[调整后的比值比(95%置信区间):2.6(1.3-5.2)和3.0(1.3-6.6)]。

结论

根据本研究结果,可以推断使用SABA的哮喘人群在很大程度上未得到控制,且过度使用缓解期吸入器。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3953/8331120/7ed95feba30b/JAA-14-943-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验