Department of Infectious Diseases, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Apr;2(4):e159-e167. doi: 10.1016/s2666-5247(20)30202-0. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
Although antibiotic prophylaxis with levofloxacin can reduce the risk of serious infection in immunocompromised patients, the potential contribution of prophylaxis to antibiotic resistance is a major drawback. We aimed to identify the effects of levofloxacin prophylaxis, given to paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia to prevent infections during induction chemotherapy, on antibiotic resistance in gastrointestinal microbiota after completion of induction and consolidation therapy.
This prospective, single-centre (St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA) cohort study included children (≤18 years) receiving therapy for newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and who received either primary levofloxacin prophylaxis or no antibacterial prophylaxis (aside from prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) and provided at least two stool samples, including one after completion of induction therapy. We used metagenomic sequencing to identify bacterial genes that confer resistance to fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or other antibiotics, and to identify point mutations in bacterial topoisomerases () that confer resistance to fluoroquinolones. We then used generalised linear mixed models to compare the prevalence and relative abundance of antibiotic resistance gene groups after completion of induction and consolidation therapy between participants who had received levofloxacin and those who received no prophylaxis.
Between Feb 1, 2012, and April 30, 2016, 118 stool samples (32 baseline, 49 after induction, and 37 after consolidation) were collected from 49 evaluable participants; of these participants, 31 (63%) received levofloxacin prophylaxis during induction therapy and 18 (37%) received no antibacterial prophylaxis. Over the course of induction therapy, there was an overall increase in the relative abundance of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance genes (estimated mean fold change 5·9, 95% CI 3·6-9·6; p<0·0001), which was not modified by levofloxacin prophylaxis (p=0·46). By contrast, the prevalence of topoisomerase point mutations increased over the course of induction therapy in levofloxacin recipients (mean prevalence 10·4% [95% CI 3·2-25·4] after induction therapy 3·7% [0·2-22·5] at baseline) but not other participants (0% 0%; p<0·0001). There was no significant difference between prophylaxis groups with respect to changes in aminoglycoside, β-lactam, vancomycin, or multidrug resistance genes after completion of induction or consolidation therapy.
Analysing the gastrointestinal resistome can provide insights into the effects of antibiotics on the risk of antibiotic-resistant infections. In this study, antibiotic prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or levofloxacin during induction therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia appeared to increase the short-term and medium-term risk of colonisation with bacteria resistant to these antibiotics, but not to other drugs. More research is needed to determine the longer-term effects of antibacterial prophylaxis on colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Children's Infection Defense Center at St Jude Children's Research Hospital, American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, and National Institutes of Health.
虽然左氧氟沙星预防性抗生素治疗可以降低免疫功能低下患者发生严重感染的风险,但预防性使用抗生素会导致抗生素耐药性,这是一个主要的缺点。我们旨在确定在诱导化疗期间预防感染而给予小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病患者左氧氟沙星预防治疗,对诱导和巩固治疗完成后胃肠道微生物群中抗生素耐药性的影响。
这是一项前瞻性、单中心(美国田纳西州孟菲斯市圣裘德儿童研究医院)队列研究,纳入了接受新诊断的急性淋巴细胞白血病治疗的儿童(≤18 岁),他们接受了左氧氟沙星预防性治疗或未接受任何抗菌预防治疗(除了复方磺胺甲噁唑预防治疗),并提供了至少两份粪便样本,包括一份在诱导治疗完成后。我们使用宏基因组测序来鉴定赋予氟喹诺酮类药物、复方磺胺甲噁唑或其他抗生素耐药性的细菌基因,并鉴定赋予氟喹诺酮类药物耐药性的细菌拓扑异构酶()点突变。然后,我们使用广义线性混合模型比较接受左氧氟沙星和未接受预防治疗的参与者在完成诱导和巩固治疗后,抗生素耐药基因群的流行率和相对丰度。
2012 年 2 月 1 日至 2016 年 4 月 30 日期间,从 49 名可评估参与者中收集了 118 份粪便样本(32 份基线样本、49 份诱导后样本和 37 份巩固后样本);其中,31 名(63%)参与者在诱导治疗期间接受了左氧氟沙星预防治疗,18 名(37%)参与者未接受任何抗菌预防治疗。在诱导治疗过程中,总的来说,复方磺胺甲噁唑耐药基因的相对丰度增加(估计平均倍数变化 5.9,95%CI 3.6-9.6;p<0.0001),而左氧氟沙星预防治疗并没有改变这一趋势(p=0.46)。相比之下,在左氧氟沙星治疗组中,拓扑异构酶点突变的流行率在诱导治疗过程中增加(诱导治疗后平均流行率 10.4%[95%CI 3.2-25.4],而基线时为 3.7%[0.2-22.5]),但在其他参与者中没有增加(0%[0-0%];p<0.0001)。在完成诱导和巩固治疗后,预防组之间在氨基糖苷类、β-内酰胺类、万古霉素和多药耐药基因方面的变化没有显著差异。
分析胃肠道耐药组可以深入了解抗生素对抗生素耐药性感染风险的影响。在这项研究中,在急性淋巴细胞白血病诱导治疗期间使用复方磺胺甲噁唑或左氧氟沙星预防性抗生素治疗似乎增加了短期内和中期内对这些抗生素耐药细菌定植的风险,但不会增加对其他药物的耐药风险。需要进一步研究以确定抗菌预防治疗对定植抗生素耐药细菌的长期影响。
圣裘德儿童研究医院儿童感染防御中心、美国黎巴嫩叙利亚裔协会慈善基金会和美国国立卫生研究院。