Suppr超能文献

吞咽肌肉训练治疗口咽吞咽困难:在线治疗与面对面治疗的非劣效性研究。

Swallowing muscle training for oropharyngeal dysphagia: A non-inferiority study of online versus face-to-face therapy.

机构信息

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Sant Pau University Hospital, Spain.

Department of Engineering and Information Systems, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona Tech, Spain.

出版信息

J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Jan;30(1):116-120. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211035033. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to show the non-inferiority of the telemedicine therapy versus face-to-face using the exercise therapy of oropharyngeal muscles in 183 patients treated consecutively from 2010 to 2020.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective study comparing two dysphagia treatment groups: online versus face-to-face. Patients were distributed in a non-random way but according to patient's preferences. All patients followed the same pathway and were evaluated at the beginning and at the end of the study using the dysphagia outcome and severity scale and the functional oral intake scale. A non-inferiority analysis approximation was done with delta = 1 in both variables.

RESULTS

Within a total of 183 patients, 114 (62.3%) used the online treatment and 69 (37.7%) the face-to-face one. The main cause of dysphagia was neurological in the total sample (60.7%) and within both groups. When we evaluate the clinical response, we find that both groups improved regardless of the type of therapy. The confidence interval of the difference between the beginning and the end of treatment did not reach the inferior limit of the delta defined, therefore supporting the no inferiority of online versus presential.

DISCUSSION

This study shows the no inferiority of the online therapy versus the face-to-face one for the oropharyngeal training of the swallow muscles.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在展示在 2010 年至 2020 年间连续治疗的 183 例患者中,远程医疗治疗与面对面治疗在使用口咽肌肉运动疗法方面的非劣效性。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性研究,比较了两种吞咽障碍治疗组:在线治疗组和面对面治疗组。患者的分配不是随机的,而是根据患者的偏好进行的。所有患者都遵循相同的路径,并在研究开始和结束时使用吞咽障碍结局和严重程度量表以及功能性口腔摄入量表进行评估。在这两个变量中,我们都进行了 delta=1 的非劣效性分析逼近。

结果

在总共 183 例患者中,114 例(62.3%)使用在线治疗,69 例(37.7%)使用面对面治疗。在总样本(60.7%)和两组中,吞咽障碍的主要原因是神经源性的。当我们评估临床反应时,我们发现两组无论采用哪种治疗方式都有所改善。治疗开始和结束时差值的置信区间未达到定义的 delta 下限,因此支持在线治疗与面对面治疗之间无劣效性。

讨论

本研究表明,在口咽肌肉吞咽训练方面,在线治疗与面对面治疗相比不劣效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验