Sinus and Skull Base Surgery Program, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Jan;12(1):71-82. doi: 10.1002/alr.22874. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted safety concerns surrounding possible aerosol-generating procedures, but comparative data on the smallest particles capable of transmitting this virus remain limited. We evaluated the effect of nasal endoscopy on aerosol concentration and the role of a high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter in reducing aerosol concentration.
Otolaryngology patients were prospectively enrolled in an outpatient, cross-sectional study. Demographic information and clinic room characteristics were recorded. A scanning mobility particle sizer and GRIMM aerosol monitor measured aerosols 14.3 nm to 34 μm in diameter (i.e., particles smaller than those currently examined in the literature) during (1) nasal endoscopy (± debridement) and (2) no nasal endoscopy encounters. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t test were performed to compare aerosol concentrations and impact of HEPA filtration.
Sixty-two patients met inclusion criteria (25 nasal endoscopy without debridement; 18 nasal endoscopy with debridement; 19 no nasal endoscopy). There was no significant difference in age or gender across cohorts. Aerosol concentration in the nasal endoscopy cohort (± debridement) was not greater than the no nasal endoscopy cohort (p = 0.36; confidence interval [95% CI], -1.76 to 0.17 μg/m ; and p = 0.12; 95% CI, -0.11 to 2.14 μg/m , respectively). Aerosol concentrations returned to baseline after 8.76 min without a HEPA filter versus 4.75 min with a HEPA filter (p = 0.001; 95% CI, 1.73-6.3 min).
Using advanced instrumentation and a comparative study design, aerosol concentration was shown to be no greater during nasal endoscopy versus no endoscopy encounters. HEPA filter utilization reduced aerosol concentrations significantly faster than no HEPA filter.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行凸显了对可能产生气溶胶的程序的安全问题,但有关能够传播这种病毒的最小颗粒的比较数据仍然有限。我们评估了鼻内窥镜检查对气溶胶浓度的影响,以及高效空气过滤器(HEPA)在降低气溶胶浓度方面的作用。
耳鼻喉科患者前瞻性地纳入了一项门诊横断面研究。记录了人口统计学信息和诊室特征。使用扫描迁移率颗粒粒径仪和 Grimm 气溶胶监测仪测量了直径为 14.3nm 至 34μm(即小于目前文献中检查的颗粒)的气溶胶,在(1)鼻内窥镜检查(±清创术)和(2)无鼻内窥镜检查时进行测量。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和学生 t 检验比较气溶胶浓度和 HEPA 过滤的影响。
62 例患者符合纳入标准(25 例无清创术鼻内窥镜检查;18 例有清创术鼻内窥镜检查;19 例无鼻内窥镜检查)。各队列之间的年龄和性别无显著差异。鼻内窥镜检查(±清创术)组的气溶胶浓度并不高于无鼻内窥镜检查组(p=0.36;置信区间[95%CI],-1.76 至 0.17μg/m3;p=0.12;95%CI,-0.11 至 2.14μg/m3)。无 HEPA 过滤器时,气溶胶浓度在 8.76 分钟后恢复到基线,而有 HEPA 过滤器时,气溶胶浓度在 4.75 分钟后恢复到基线(p=0.001;95%CI,1.73-6.3 分钟)。
使用先进的仪器和比较研究设计,与无内窥镜检查相比,鼻内窥镜检查时的气溶胶浓度没有增加。HEPA 过滤器的使用比没有 HEPA 过滤器的情况下,显著更快地降低了气溶胶浓度。