• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨多种语言变体连接词和概念的规范、评级和关系。

Linking norms, ratings, and relations of words and concepts across multiple language varieties.

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany.

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):864-884. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01650-1. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-021-01650-1
PMID:34357536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9046307/
Abstract

Psychologists and linguists collect various data on word and concept properties. In psychology, scholars have accumulated norms and ratings for a large number of words in languages with many speakers. In linguistics, scholars have accumulated cross-linguistic information about the relations between words and concepts. Until now, however, there have been no efforts to combine information from the two fields, which would allow comparison of psychological and linguistic properties across different languages. The Database of Cross-Linguistic Norms, Ratings, and Relations for Words and Concepts (NoRaRe) is the first attempt to close this gap. Building on a reference catalog that offers standardization of concepts used in historical and typological language comparison, it integrates data from psychology and linguistics, collected from 98 data sets, covering 65 unique properties for 40 languages. The database is curated with the help of manual, automated, semi-automated workflows and uses a software API to control and access the data. The database is accessible via a web application, the software API, or using scripting languages. In this study, we present how the database is structured, how it can be extended, and how we control the quality of the data curation process. To illustrate its application, we present three case studies that test the validity of our approach, the accuracy of our workflows, and the integrative potential of the database. Due to regular version updates, the NoRaRe database has the potential to advance research in psychology and linguistics by offering researchers an integrated perspective on both fields.

摘要

心理学家和语言学家收集各种关于单词和概念属性的数据。在心理学领域,学者们积累了许多语言的大量单词的规范和评级。在语言学领域,学者们积累了关于单词和概念之间关系的跨语言信息。然而,到目前为止,还没有人努力将这两个领域的信息结合起来,以便在不同的语言之间比较心理和语言属性。跨语言词汇、概念规范、评级和关系数据库(NoRaRe)是首次尝试弥合这一差距。该数据库以历史和类型学语言比较中使用的概念标准化参考目录为基础,整合了来自心理学和语言学的数据,这些数据来自 98 个数据集,涵盖了 40 种语言的 65 个独特属性。该数据库是在手动、自动化、半自动工作流程的帮助下进行管理的,并使用软件 API 来控制和访问数据。该数据库可通过网络应用程序、软件 API 或使用脚本语言访问。在本研究中,我们介绍了数据库的结构、如何扩展数据库以及如何控制数据管理过程的质量。为了说明其应用,我们展示了三个案例研究,这些研究测试了我们方法的有效性、工作流程的准确性以及数据库的综合潜力。由于定期的版本更新,NoRaRe 数据库有可能通过为研究人员提供对这两个领域的综合视角,来推动心理学和语言学的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/730a1eb8b5d1/13428_2021_1650_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/22b8b08cdfa5/13428_2021_1650_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/75c0abe8a2b7/13428_2021_1650_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/0b779f8fcc13/13428_2021_1650_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/8a9f3c495117/13428_2021_1650_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/91a875e9126e/13428_2021_1650_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/1e0f78d4d843/13428_2021_1650_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/730a1eb8b5d1/13428_2021_1650_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/22b8b08cdfa5/13428_2021_1650_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/75c0abe8a2b7/13428_2021_1650_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/0b779f8fcc13/13428_2021_1650_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/8a9f3c495117/13428_2021_1650_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/91a875e9126e/13428_2021_1650_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/1e0f78d4d843/13428_2021_1650_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e47a/9046307/730a1eb8b5d1/13428_2021_1650_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Linking norms, ratings, and relations of words and concepts across multiple language varieties.跨多种语言变体连接词和概念的规范、评级和关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):864-884. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01650-1. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
2
Curating and extending data for language comparison in Concepticon and NoRaRe.在概念库(Concepticon)和NoRaRe中整理并扩充用于语言比较的数据。
Open Res Eur. 2023 May 24;2:141. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15380.3. eCollection 2022.
3
The Database of Cross-Linguistic Colexifications, reproducible analysis of cross-linguistic polysemies.跨语言搭配数据库,跨语言多义词的可重复分析。
Sci Data. 2020 Jan 13;7(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0341-x.
4
Emotional Prototypicality Ratings for 636 Chinese Words: A Database of Chinese Words with Affective Information.636 个中文词汇的情绪原型性评价:含情感信息的中文词汇数据库。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2023 Dec;52(6):2775-2792. doi: 10.1007/s10936-023-10018-9. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
5
A Computational Approach to Identifying Cultural Keywords Across Languages.一种跨语言识别文化关键词的计算方法。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Jan;48(1):e13402. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13402.
6
Ratings of age of acquisition of 299 words across 25 languages: Is there a cross-linguistic order of words?25种语言中299个单词的习得年龄评级:是否存在跨语言的词汇顺序?
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):1154-77. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0636-6.
7
Dutch sensory modality norms.荷兰感觉模式规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Jun;54(3):1306-1318. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01656-9. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
8
Word Order Typology Interacts With Linguistic Complexity: A Cross-Linguistic Corpus Study.语序类型学与语言复杂性相互作用:一项跨语言语料库研究。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12822. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12822.
9
The Potential of Automatic Word Comparison for Historical Linguistics.自动词比较在历史语言学中的潜力
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170046. eCollection 2017.
10
Imageability ratings across languages.跨语言的可想象性评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1187-1197. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0936-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Affective, semantic, frequency, and descriptive norms for 107 face emojis.107 个面部表情 emoji 的情感、语义、频率和描述性规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8159-8180. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02444-x. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
2
Ethics-testing an eating disorder recovery memoir: a pre-publication experiment.对一本饮食失调康复回忆录进行伦理测试:一项出版前实验。
J Eat Disord. 2024 Aug 12;12(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01060-6.
3
Curating and extending data for language comparison in Concepticon and NoRaRe.在概念库(Concepticon)和NoRaRe中整理并扩充用于语言比较的数据。

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural influences on word meanings revealed through large-scale semantic alignment.通过大规模语义对齐揭示词义的文化影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;4(10):1029-1038. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0924-8. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
2
The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.兰开斯特感觉运动规范:40000 个英语单词的感知和动作强度的多维测量
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1271-1291. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z.
3
Lexicosemantic, affective, and distributional norms for 1,000 Dutch adjectives.
Open Res Eur. 2023 May 24;2:141. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15380.3. eCollection 2022.
荷兰语 1000 个形容词的词汇语义、情感和分布规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1108-1121. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01303-4.
4
English semantic feature production norms: An extended database of 4436 concepts.英文语义特征产生规范:一个扩展的包含 4436 个概念的数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Aug;51(4):1849-1863. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01243-z.
5
LAB: Linguistic Annotated Bibliography - a searchable portal for normed database information.实验室:语言标注书目——一个可搜索的规范化数据库信息门户。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Aug;51(4):1878-1888. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1130-8.
6
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales.格拉斯哥规范:9 个尺度上对 5500 个单词的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1258-1270. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3.
7
Word prevalence norms for 62,000 English lemmas.62000 个英语词汇的词频规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):467-479. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1077-9.
8
Normative ratings for perceptual and motor attributes of 750 object concepts in Spanish.西班牙语 750 个物体概念的知觉和运动属性的规范评定。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1632-1644. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0970-y.
9
MELD-SCH: A megastudy of lexical decision in simplified Chinese.MELD-SCH:简体中文词汇判断的一项巨量研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):1763-1777. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0944-0.
10
Norms of valence, arousal, concreteness, familiarity, imageability, and context availability for 1,100 Chinese words.1100个中文词汇的效价、唤醒度、具体性、熟悉度、可想象性和语境可用性规范
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1374-1385. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0793-2.