• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兰开斯特感觉运动规范:40000 个英语单词的感知和动作强度的多维测量

The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1271-1291. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z
PMID:31832879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7280349/
Abstract

Sensorimotor information plays a fundamental role in cognition. However, the existing materials that measure the sensorimotor basis of word meanings and concepts have been restricted in terms of their sample size and breadth of sensorimotor experience. Here we present norms of sensorimotor strength for 39,707 concepts across six perceptual modalities (touch, hearing, smell, taste, vision, and interoception) and five action effectors (mouth/throat, hand/arm, foot/leg, head excluding mouth/throat, and torso), gathered from a total of 3,500 individual participants using Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform. The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms are unique and innovative in a number of respects: They represent the largest-ever set of semantic norms for English, at 40,000 words × 11 dimensions (plus several informative cross-dimensional variables), they extend perceptual strength norming to the new modality of interoception, and they include the first norming of action strength across separate bodily effectors. In the first study, we describe the data collection procedures, provide summary descriptives of the dataset, and interpret the relations observed between sensorimotor dimensions. We then report two further studies, in which we (1) extracted an optimal single-variable composite of the 11-dimension sensorimotor profile (Minkowski 3 strength) and (2) demonstrated the utility of both perceptual and action strength in facilitating lexical decision times and accuracy in two separate datasets. These norms provide a valuable resource to researchers in diverse areas, including psycholinguistics, grounded cognition, cognitive semantics, knowledge representation, machine learning, and big-data approaches to the analysis of language and conceptual representations. The data are accessible via the Open Science Framework (http://osf.io/7emr6/) and an interactive web application (https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/psychology/lsnorms/).

摘要

感觉运动信息在认知中起着基础作用。然而,现有的衡量词义和概念的感觉运动基础的材料在样本量和感觉运动经验的广度方面受到限制。在这里,我们提出了 39707 个概念在六种感觉模式(触觉、听觉、嗅觉、味觉、视觉和内感受)和五个动作效应器(嘴/喉咙、手/臂、脚/腿、头不包括嘴/喉咙和躯干)的感觉运动强度的规范,这些规范是从亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk 平台上的 3500 名个体参与者中收集的。兰开斯特感觉运动规范在许多方面是独特和创新的:它们代表了英语中最大的语义规范集,共有 40000 个单词×11 个维度(加上几个信息性的跨维度变量),它们将感觉运动强度规范扩展到新的内感受模态,并且包括对单独身体效应器的动作强度的首次规范。在第一项研究中,我们描述了数据收集程序,提供了数据集的总结描述,并解释了观察到的感觉运动维度之间的关系。然后,我们报告了另外两项研究,在这两项研究中,我们(1)从 11 维感觉运动特征中提取出一个最佳的单一变量组合(Minkowski 3 强度),(2)在两个独立的数据集上展示了知觉和动作强度在促进词汇决策时间和准确性方面的效用。这些规范为包括心理语言学、扎根认知、认知语义学、知识表示、机器学习和语言及概念表示的大数据分析在内的不同领域的研究人员提供了宝贵的资源。这些数据可以通过开放科学框架(http://osf.io/7emr6/)和一个交互式网络应用程序(https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/psychology/lsnorms/)获得。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/31b9c94fb79c/13428_2019_1316_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/aaf768efeaf3/13428_2019_1316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/ab3c40a2bf1d/13428_2019_1316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/4ee45423c955/13428_2019_1316_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/03ab47ed2116/13428_2019_1316_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/e84d687a317f/13428_2019_1316_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/31b9c94fb79c/13428_2019_1316_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/aaf768efeaf3/13428_2019_1316_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/ab3c40a2bf1d/13428_2019_1316_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/4ee45423c955/13428_2019_1316_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/03ab47ed2116/13428_2019_1316_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/e84d687a317f/13428_2019_1316_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0996/7280349/31b9c94fb79c/13428_2019_1316_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.兰开斯特感觉运动规范:40000 个英语单词的感知和动作强度的多维测量
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Jun;52(3):1271-1291. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z.
2
The Italian Sensorimotor Norms: Perception and action strength measures for 959 words.意大利感觉运动规范:959 个单词的感知和动作力量测量。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Dec;55(8):4035-4047. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02004-1. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
3
Sensorimotor distance: A grounded measure of semantic similarity for 800 million concept pairs.感觉运动距离:用于衡量 8 亿对概念对语义相似性的基础测度。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3416-3432. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01965-7. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Perceptual and Interoceptive Strength Norms for 270 French Words.270个法语单词的感知和内感受强度规范
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 11;12:667271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667271. eCollection 2021.
5
Dutch sensory modality norms.荷兰感觉模式规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Jun;54(3):1306-1318. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01656-9. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
6
Perceptual modality norms for 1,121 Italian words: A comparison with concreteness and imageability scores and an analysis of their impact in word processing tasks.1,121 个意大利语单词的知觉方式规范:与具体性和形象性得分的比较,以及对其在文字处理任务中的影响的分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Aug;52(4):1599-1616. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01337-8.
7
Modality exclusivity norms for 400 nouns: the relationship between perceptual experience and surface word form.400 个名词的模态排他性规范:知觉体验与词表形式的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Jun;45(2):516-26. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0267-0.
8
The cross-linguistic comparison of perceptual strength norms for Korean, English and L2 English.韩语、英语和二语英语感知强度规范的跨语言比较。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 19;14:1188909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1188909. eCollection 2023.
9
Visual and auditory perceptual strength norms for 3,596 French nouns and their relationship with other psycholinguistic variables.3596 个法语音觉和听觉感知强度名词的规范及其与其他心理语言学变量的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):2094-2105. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01254-w.
10
Mapping semantic space: Exploring the higher-order structure of word meaning.语义空间映射:探索词义的高阶结构。
Cognition. 2024 Jul;248:105794. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105794. Epub 2024 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Specificity effect in concrete/abstract semantic categorization task.具体/抽象语义分类任务中的特异性效应
Cogn Process. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01286-5.
2
Free Association Database for a 62-Word Dataset Including Emotion and Colour Terms in English, Estonian, French, German, Italian, Lithuanian, and Spanish: Data from 14 Countries.包含英语、爱沙尼亚语、法语、德语、意大利语、立陶宛语和西班牙语中情感和颜色词汇的62个单词数据集的自由联想数据库:来自14个国家的数据。
J Open Psychol Data. 2025 Aug 4;13:4. doi: 10.5334/jopd.140. eCollection 2025.
3
Iconic Words Are Associated With Iconic Gestures.

本文引用的文献

1
Mandarin Chinese modality exclusivity norms.普通话情态排他性规范。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0211336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211336. eCollection 2019.
2
Quantifying sensorimotor experience: Body-object interaction ratings for more than 9,000 English words.量化感觉运动体验:9000 多个英语单词的身体-物体相互作用评级。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):453-466. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1171-z.
3
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales.格拉斯哥规范:9 个尺度上对 5500 个单词的评分。
标志性的词语与标志性的手势相关联。
Cogn Sci. 2025 Aug;49(8):e70098. doi: 10.1111/cogs.70098.
4
Reward as a facet of word meaning: Ratings of motivation for 8,601 English words.作为词义一个方面的奖赏:对8601个英语单词的动机评级
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 29;57(9):242. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02762-8.
5
Action and object picture naming in Turkish: A psycholinguistic database.土耳其语中的动作和物体图片命名:一个心理语言学数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 15;57(8):225. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02764-6.
6
Large language models without grounding recover non-sensorimotor but not sensorimotor features of human concepts.没有基础的大语言模型能够恢复人类概念的非感觉运动特征,但无法恢复感觉运动特征。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02203-8.
7
From Multimodal Sensorimotor Integration to Semantic Networks: A Phylogenetic Perspective on Speech and Language Evolution.从多模态感觉运动整合到语义网络:言语和语言进化的系统发育视角
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025 Apr 24;6. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00164. eCollection 2025.
8
Issues in Grounded Cognition and How to Solve Them - the Minimalist Account.具身认知中的问题及如何解决这些问题——极简主义解释
J Cogn. 2025 Apr 21;8(1):31. doi: 10.5334/joc.444. eCollection 2025.
9
English verbs semantic norms database: Concreteness, embodiment, imageability, valence and arousal ratings for 3,500 verbs.英语动词语义规范数据库:3500个动词的具体性、体现性、形象性、效价和唤醒评级
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Apr 23;57(5):153. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02675-6.
10
Contrasting the organization of concrete and abstract word meanings.对比具体词汇和抽象词汇意义的组织方式。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02671-z.
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1258-1270. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3.
4
Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish.手语和口语词汇中的象似性:美国手语、英国手语、英语和西班牙语之间的比较
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 14;9:1433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01433. eCollection 2018.
5
Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage.视觉在感知语言中占主导地位:英语感觉词汇最优化用于感知。
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:213-220. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
6
Interoception: the forgotten modality in perceptual grounding of abstract and concrete concepts.内感受:抽象和具体概念的知觉基础中被遗忘的模态。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0143.
7
Perceptual Experience Norms for 506 Russian Nouns: Modality Rating, Spatial Localization, Manipulability, Imageability and Other Variables.506个俄语名词的感知经验规范:模态评级、空间定位、可操作性、形象性及其他变量
J Psycholinguist Res. 2018 Jun;47(3):641-661. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9548-1.
8
Body-part specific interactions of action verb processing with motor behaviour.动作动词加工与运动行为的身体部位特定交互作用。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jun 15;328:149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space.荷兰模态排他性规范:在空间中模拟感知模态。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):2204-2218. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0852-3.
10
How Many Words Do We Know? Practical Estimates of Vocabulary Size Dependent on Word Definition, the Degree of Language Input and the Participant's Age.我们认识多少单词?基于单词定义、语言输入程度和参与者年龄的词汇量实际估算
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 29;7:1116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116. eCollection 2016.