Wellcome Centre for Integrative Parasitology, Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Vector Control Division, Ministry of Health, Uganda.
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 May 3;74(9):1557-1563. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab679.
Despite decades of interventions, 240 million people have schistosomiasis. Infections cannot be directly observed, and egg-based Kato-Katz thick smears lack sensitivity, affected treatment efficacy and reinfection rate estimates. The point-of-care circulating cathodic antigen (referred to from here as POC-CCA+) test is advocated as an improvement on the Kato-Katz method, but improved estimates are limited by ambiguities in the interpretation of trace results.
We collected repeated Kato-Katz egg counts from 210 school-aged children and scored POC-CCA tests according to the manufacturer's guidelines (referred to from here as POC-CCA+) and the externally developed G score. We used hidden Markov models parameterized with Kato-Katz; Kato-Katz and POC-CCA+; and Kato-Katz and G-Scores, inferring latent clearance and reinfection probabilities at four timepoints over six-months through a more formal statistical reconciliation of these diagnostics than previously conducted. Our approach required minimal but robust assumptions regarding trace interpretations.
Antigen-based models estimated higher infection prevalence across all timepoints compared with the Kato-Katz model, corresponding to lower clearance and higher reinfection estimates. Specifically, pre-treatment prevalence estimates were 85% (Kato-Katz; 95% CI: 79%-92%), 99% (POC-CCA+; 97%-100%) and 98% (G-Score; 95%-100%). Post-treatment, 93% (Kato-Katz; 88%-96%), 72% (POC-CCA+; 64%-79%) and 65% (G-Score; 57%-73%) of those infected were estimated to clear infection. Of those who cleared infection, 35% (Kato-Katz; 27%-42%), 51% (POC-CCA+; 41%-62%) and 44% (G-Score; 33%-55%) were estimated to have been reinfected by 9-weeks.
Treatment impact was shorter-lived than Kato-Katz-based estimates alone suggested, with lower clearance and rapid reinfection. At 3 weeks after treatment, longer-term clearance dynamics are captured. At 9 weeks after treatment, reinfection was captured, but failed clearance could not be distinguished from rapid reinfection. Therefore, frequent sampling is required to understand these important epidemiological dynamics.
尽管已经采取了几十年的干预措施,但仍有 2.4 亿人患有血吸虫病。无法直接观察到感染情况,而基于虫卵的加藤厚涂片法(Kato-Katz thick smears)敏感性不足,影响了对治疗效果和再感染率的估计。床边循环阴离子抗原检测(简称 POC-CCA+)被认为是对加藤厚涂片法的改进,但由于对痕量结果的解释存在歧义,因此改善估计值的效果有限。
我们从 210 名学龄儿童中反复收集加藤厚涂片虫卵计数,并按照制造商的指南(简称 POC-CCA+)和外部开发的 G 评分对 POC-CCA 检测进行评分。我们使用 Kato-Katz 进行参数化的隐马尔可夫模型;Kato-Katz 和 POC-CCA+;以及 Kato-Katz 和 G 评分,通过比以前更正式的统计协调这些诊断,在六个月内的四个时间点推断潜在的清除和再感染概率。我们的方法对痕量解释的最小但稳健的假设。
基于抗原的模型在所有时间点都估计出比加藤厚涂片法更高的感染流行率,这对应于更低的清除率和更高的再感染率。具体而言,治疗前的流行率估计值分别为 85%(加藤厚涂片法;95%CI:79%-92%)、99%(POC-CCA+;97%-100%)和 98%(G 评分;95%-100%)。治疗后,估计有 93%(加藤厚涂片法;88%-96%)、72%(POC-CCA+;64%-79%)和 65%(G 评分;57%-73%)的感染者清除了感染。在清除感染的人群中,有 35%(加藤厚涂片法;27%-42%)、51%(POC-CCA+;41%-62%)和 44%(G 评分;33%-55%)在 9 周时被估计再次感染。
治疗效果比基于加藤厚涂片法的估计要短,清除率较低,再感染速度较快。在治疗后 3 周时,更能捕捉到长期的清除动态。在治疗后 9 周时,检测到了再感染,但无法区分治疗失败和快速再感染。因此,需要频繁采样才能了解这些重要的流行病学动态。