Thuringian Animal Health Fund, Animal Health Service, Victor-Goerttler-Strasse 4, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Thuringian Animal Health Fund, Animal Health Service, Victor-Goerttler-Strasse 4, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Vet J. 2021 Sep;275:105728. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105728. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
Between-herd transmission of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) by subclinically infected cattle is an important risk which can hamper effective control of paratuberculosis. Knowledge of herd status would substantially reduce this risk; MAP positive farms can be detected with environmental sampling. The objective of this study was to compare cumulative sensitivities of annual environmental sampling with two or four samples per sampling event without knowledge of true herd status and to calculate the number of sampling events to achieve a cumulative sensitivity of at least 0.9. Data from three repeated sampling events in two study populations, one with 55 herds (two samples/event) and another with 30 herds (four samples/event) including test results, herd and sample characteristics and prior prevalence estimates, were derived from the Alberta Johne's Disease Initiative (Alberta, Canada). A recursive Bayesian latent class model was used to predict the cumulative sensitivity of repeated environmental sampling events. A sampling scheme with four samples per sampling event had a higher cumulative sensitivity than an alternative scheme with two samples. To achieve a cumulative sensitivity of at least 0.9 with 95% probability, eight sampling events with two environmental samples per set, or four sampling events with four samples per set were required. Further model assessment demonstrated that these results can only be generalized to cattle populations with a similar within-herd prevalence to those studied here (approximately 0.08). Nonetheless, these results could help predict herd-level prevalence in cattle populations after environmental testing and provide information regarding the uncertainty behind status estimates for herds repeatedly tested using environmental samples.
牛分枝杆菌亚种副结核病(MAP)在亚临床感染牛之间的传播是一个重要的风险因素,会阻碍副结核病的有效控制。了解牛群的状况将大大降低这种风险;可以通过环境采样来检测 MAP 阳性农场。本研究的目的是比较在不知道真实牛群状况的情况下,每年进行两次或四次环境采样的累积敏感性,并计算达到至少 0.9 累积敏感性所需的采样次数。本研究的数据来自于阿尔伯塔省约翰氏病倡议(加拿大阿尔伯塔省)的两个研究人群中的三个重复采样事件,一个人群有 55 个牛群(每次采样两次),另一个人群有 30 个牛群(每次采样四次),包括测试结果、牛群和样本特征以及先验流行率估计。采用递归贝叶斯潜在类别模型预测重复环境采样事件的累积敏感性。与每次采样两次的替代方案相比,每次采样四次的方案具有更高的累积敏感性。为了以 95%的概率获得至少 0.9 的累积敏感性,需要进行八次采样,每次采样两次,或者进行四次采样,每次采样四次。进一步的模型评估表明,这些结果只能推广到与本研究中研究的牛群具有相似的群内流行率(约 0.08)的牛群中。尽管如此,这些结果可以帮助预测环境测试后牛群的 herd-level 流行率,并提供有关使用环境样本对重复测试的 herd 进行状态估计背后不确定性的信息。