National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya, Kanoya, Kagoshima, Japan; International Research Fellows of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan.
National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya, Kanoya, Kagoshima, Japan.
J Biomech. 2021 Sep 20;126:110655. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110655. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
This study elucidated kinetic and kinematic changes between control and weighted vest sprinting with a load of 7% body mass. Fourteen male sprinters completed 60 m control and vest sprints over a long force platform system. Step-to-step ground reaction force and spatiotemporal variables were grouped, representing the initial acceleration (1st-4th steps), middle acceleration (5th-14th steps), later acceleration (15th step-step before maximum velocity reached) and maximum velocity (stride where maximum velocity reached) phase during each trial. Two-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey HSD and a Cohen's d effect size with 95% confidence intervals elucidated the difference between trials and phases. Between control and vest trials the velocity decreased (3.41-3.78%) through trivial-small step length (1.95-2.72%) and frequency (0.87-1.54%) decreases. Vertical impulse increased (6.46-6.78%) through moderate support time increases (4.84-6.00%), coupled with no effective vertical mean force differences during the vest trial, compared to the control. There was no significant interaction between trials and phases. Therefore, although weighted vest trials did not increase vertical mean force production, vests did induce an increased vertical force application duration during the support phase step-to-step while supporting a larger total load (body mass plus vest mass).
本研究阐明了在 7%体重负荷下,控制组和负重背心组冲刺的动力学和运动学变化。14 名男性短跑运动员在长力台系统上完成了 60 米的控制组和背心组冲刺。逐步步地地面反作用力和时空变量被分组,代表每个试验的初始加速阶段(第 1-4 步)、中间加速阶段(第 5-14 步)、后期加速阶段(在达到最大速度之前的第 15 步)和最大速度阶段(达到最大速度的步幅)。采用事后 Tukey HSD 的双向方差分析和 Cohen's d 效应量(95%置信区间)阐明了试验和阶段之间的差异。与控制组相比,背心组的速度通过小到中等的步长(1.95-2.72%)和频率(0.87-1.54%)下降,分别降低了 3.41%-3.78%。垂直冲量通过适度的支撑时间增加(4.84-6.00%)而增加了 6.46%-6.78%,而在背心试验中,与控制组相比,有效垂直平均力没有差异。试验和阶段之间没有显著的相互作用。因此,尽管负重背心试验并没有增加垂直平均力的产生,但背心确实在支撑阶段的每一步中增加了垂直力的应用时间,同时支撑更大的总负荷(体重加背心重量)。