• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

边界物体:通过艺术方法参与和满足参与式研究人群的需求。

Boundary Objects: Engaging and Bridging Needs of People in Participatory Research by Arts-Based Methods.

机构信息

Amsterdam University Medical Centre, VU Medical Centre, Department Ethics, Law and Medical Humanities, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Leyden Academy, Rijnsburgerweg 10, 2333 AA Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 26;18(15):7903. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157903.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18157903
PMID:34360192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8345743/
Abstract

Participatory health research (PHR) is a research approach in which people, including hidden populations, share lived experiences about health inequities to improve their situation through collective action. Boundary objects are produced, using arts-based methods, to be heard by stakeholders. These can bring about dialogue, connection, and involvement in a mission for social justice. This study aims to gain insight into the value and ethical issues of boundary objects that address health inequalities. A qualitative evaluation is conducted on three different boundary objects, created in different participatory studies with marginalized populations (mothers in poverty, psychiatric patients, and unemployed people). A successful boundary object evokes emotions among those who created the objects and those encountering these objects. Such objects move people and create an impulse for change. The more provocative the object, the more people feel triggered to foster change. Boundary objects may cross personal boundaries and could provoke feelings of discomfort and ignorance. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to ethics work. Boundary objects that are made by people from hidden populations may spur actions and create influence by improving the understanding of the needs of hidden populations. A dialogue about these needs is an essential step towards social justice.

摘要

参与式健康研究(PHR)是一种研究方法,通过这种方法,包括弱势群体在内的人们分享有关健康不平等的生活经历,通过集体行动来改善他们的处境。使用艺术方法制作出边界物体,以便利益相关者听到。这些可以带来对话、联系和参与社会正义使命。本研究旨在深入了解解决健康不平等问题的边界物体的价值和伦理问题。对三个不同的边界物体进行了定性评估,这些边界物体是在与弱势群体(贫困母亲、精神病人和失业人员)进行的不同参与性研究中创建的。一个成功的边界物体会在创造这些物体的人和遇到这些物体的人之间唤起情感。这样的物体可以打动人们,并激发改变的冲动。对象越具挑衅性,人们就越会感到有动力去促进变革。边界物体可能会跨越个人界限,并可能引起不适和无知的感觉。因此,有必要关注道德工作。由弱势群体制作的边界物体可能会通过提高对弱势群体需求的理解来激发行动并产生影响。关于这些需求的对话是实现社会正义的重要步骤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/618a/8345743/77e39dfa5672/ijerph-18-07903-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/618a/8345743/42f7a6710943/ijerph-18-07903-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/618a/8345743/deb4a0526be5/ijerph-18-07903-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/618a/8345743/77e39dfa5672/ijerph-18-07903-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/618a/8345743/42f7a6710943/ijerph-18-07903-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/618a/8345743/deb4a0526be5/ijerph-18-07903-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/618a/8345743/77e39dfa5672/ijerph-18-07903-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Boundary Objects: Engaging and Bridging Needs of People in Participatory Research by Arts-Based Methods.边界物体:通过艺术方法参与和满足参与式研究人群的需求。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 26;18(15):7903. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157903.
2
Ethical issues in participatory arts methods for young people with adverse childhood experiences.参与式艺术方法在有不良童年经历的年轻人中的伦理问题。
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1557-1569. doi: 10.1111/hex.13314. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Participatory ergonomics in design processes: the role of boundary objects.参与式工效学在设计过程中的应用:边界对象的作用。
Appl Ergon. 2011 Mar;42(3):464-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.006. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
4
Boundary Objects as Dialogical Learning Accelerators for Social Change in Design for Health: Systematic Review.作为健康设计中社会变革对话式学习加速器的边界对象:系统综述
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Feb 3;9(1):e31167. doi: 10.2196/31167.
5
Leveraging Arts for Justice, Equity, and Public Health: The Program and Its Implications for Community-Based Health Promotion Practice and Research.利用艺术促进公正、公平和公共卫生:该计划及其对基于社区的健康促进实践和研究的影响。
Health Promot Pract. 2021 May;22(1_suppl):91S-100S. doi: 10.1177/1524839921996066.
6
[Participatory health research: origins and current trends].[参与式健康研究:起源与当前趋势]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):140-145. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03264-y. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
7
Prioritizing young people's emotional health support needs via participatory research.通过参与式研究确定年轻人的情绪健康支持需求的优先级。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Jun;24(5):263-271. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12373.
8
Ethics in Community-University-Artist Partnered Research: Tensions, Contradictions and Gaps Identified in an 'Arts for Social Change' Project.社区-大学-艺术家合作研究中的伦理:在一个“艺术促进社会变革”项目中发现的紧张关系、矛盾和差距
J Acad Ethics. 2016;14:199-220. doi: 10.1007/s10805-016-9257-7. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
9
Expanding conceptualizations of harm reduction: results from a qualitative community-based participatory research study with people who inject drugs.拓展减少伤害的概念:一项基于社区的定性参与式研究结果,研究对象为注射吸毒者。
Harm Reduct J. 2017 May 12;14(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0145-2.
10
A data-based participatory approach for health equity and digital inclusion: prioritizing stakeholders.基于数据的参与式方法促进健康公平和数字包容:确定利益相关者的优先次序。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Aug 1;38(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab166.

引用本文的文献

1
Collaborating Across Organizational Boundaries to Develop, Evaluate, and Implement eHealth: Scoping Review.跨组织边界合作以开发、评估和实施电子健康:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 10;27:e67839. doi: 10.2196/67839.
2
Illustrating Fuego: the particular challenges and richness of using arts-based participatory methods to communicate experiences of volcanic disaster.展现“火焰”:运用基于艺术的参与式方法来传达火山灾难经历所面临的特殊挑战与丰富内涵。
J Appl Volcanol. 2025;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13617-025-00149-0. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
3
Opening up creative resources: towards age-friendly communities through rhizomatic thinking and doing.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Youth's Lived Experience of Anxiety through Metaphors: A Qualitative, Arts-Based Study.通过隐喻理解青少年焦虑的生活体验:一项基于艺术的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 19;18(8):4315. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084315.
2
Translating healthcare research evidence into practice: The role of linked boundary objects.将医疗保健研究证据转化为实践:联系边界对象的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Feb;246:112731. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112731. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
开放创意资源:通过根茎状思维与行动打造友善型社区。
Educ Action Res. 2024 Jun 27;33(1):70-95. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2024.2370277. eCollection 2025.
4
From science to society: Exploring the nexus between obesity research and public awareness in Brazil.从科学到社会:探索巴西肥胖研究与公众意识之间的联系。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 18;10(19):e37968. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37968. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
5
"Take a walk in someone else's shoes": the role of participatory arts for health research development and training.“设身处地为他人着想”:参与式艺术在健康研究发展与培训中的作用
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 8;9(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00441-6.
6
What Patients Prioritize for Research to Improve Their Lives and How Their Priorities Get Dismissed again.患者重视哪些能改善其生活的研究,以及他们的这些优先事项为何一再被忽视。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 9;19(4):1927. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041927.