Suppr超能文献

UpPriority 工具支持更新临床指南问题的优先级排序过程。

The UpPriority tool supported prioritization processes for updating clinical guideline questions.

机构信息

Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.

Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain; CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:149-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.07.022. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aim to 1) use the UpPriority tool to identify which clinical questions (CQs) within the clinical guidelines (CGs) need to be prioritized for updating and 2) assess the implementation of the tool in a real-world set of CGs.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We systematically assessed CQs from a sample of CGs developed in the Spanish National Health System CG program. We applied the UpPriority tool to each CG using a step-by-step process that included: 1) establishment of the UpPriority Implementation Working Group, 2) mapping of the original CG questions and recommendations, 3) development of a survey to prioritize CQs, 4) assessment of CQ's priority according to six items, 5) calculation and ranking of priority scores, 6) decision of prioritized CQs for updating, and 7) development of the priority report. We assessed the tool implementation process (appraisers' experience when using the tool) and the inter-observer reliability of the tool, and we provided suggestions for improvement.

RESULTS

We included four CGs with a total of 107 CQs on the following topics: chronic heart failure (10 CQs), inherited retinal dystrophies (39 CQs), menopause (20 CQs), and open-angle glaucoma (38 CQs). We included a total of 30 participants, most of them clinicians that were members of the original CG development groups. CQs were classified in three groups: 1) high priority (CQs prioritized for updating [16/107; 15.0%]), 2) medium priority (CQs that could be prioritized for updating [47/107; 43.9%]), and low priority (CQs that were not prioritized for updating [44/107; 41.1%]). The mean time each appraiser needed to assess the CQs with the tool was 3.8 hours (range 0.5 to 10). Agreement among the appraisers varied among the CGs. Appraisers considered that the tool was useful. We suggest some areas for consideration when using the tool including: 1) identification of key appraisers, 2) customization of training materials, 3) establishment of priority thresholds, and 4) provision of methodological support.

CONCLUSION

The UpPriority is a useful tool to identify which CQs within a CG need to be prioritized for update in a real-world scenario. Recruitment and training of topic experts are the main challenges when using the tool.

摘要

目的

我们旨在 1)使用 UpPriority 工具确定临床指南(CG)中需要优先更新的临床问题(CQs),并 2)评估该工具在真实 CG 集上的实施情况。

研究设计和设置

我们系统地评估了西班牙国家卫生系统 CG 计划开发的 CG 样本中的 CQs。我们使用逐步流程应用 UpPriority 工具,包括:1)建立 UpPriority 实施工作组,2)映射原始 CG 问题和建议,3)制定 CQ 优先级调查,4)根据六个项目评估 CQ 的优先级,5)计算和排名优先级得分,6)决定优先更新的 CQs,7)制定优先级报告。我们评估了工具实施过程(评估者使用工具时的经验)和工具的观察者间可靠性,并提供了改进建议。

结果

我们纳入了四项 CG,共 107 个关于以下主题的 CQ:慢性心力衰竭(10 个 CQ)、遗传性视网膜营养不良(39 个 CQ)、绝经期(20 个 CQ)和开角型青光眼(38 个 CQ)。我们共纳入了 30 名参与者,他们大多是原始 CG 开发小组的临床医生。CQ 分为三组:1)高优先级(需要优先更新的 CQ [16/107;15.0%]),2)中优先级(可以优先更新的 CQ [47/107;43.9%])和低优先级(无需优先更新的 CQ [44/107;41.1%])。每位评估者使用工具评估 CQ 所需的平均时间为 3.8 小时(范围为 0.5 至 10)。评估者对不同 CG 的一致性存在差异。评估者认为该工具很有用。我们建议在使用工具时考虑以下几个方面:1)确定关键评估者,2)定制培训材料,3)确定优先级阈值,以及 4)提供方法学支持。

结论

UpPriority 是一种有用的工具,可以确定 CG 中需要优先更新的 CQ,适用于真实场景。在使用工具时,招募和培训主题专家是主要挑战。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验