Cochrane Airways Group, Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, United kingdom.
Cochrane Airways Group, Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, United kingdom.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;68(3):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
Cochrane Reviews should address the most important questions for guideline writers, clinicians, and the public. It is not possible to keep all reviews up-to-date, so the Cochrane Airways Group (CAG) decided to prioritize updates and new reviews without requesting additional resources. The aim of the objective was to develop pragmatic and transparent prioritization techniques to identify 25 to 35 high-priority updates from a total of 270 CAG Reviews and become more selective over which new reviews we publish.
We used elements from existing prioritization processes, including existing health care uncertainties, expert opinion, and a decision tool. We did not conduct a full face-to-face workshop or an iterative group decision-making process.
We prioritized 30 reviews in need of updating and aimed to update these within 2 years. Within the first 18 months, nine of these have been published.
A pragmatic approach to prioritization can indicate priority reviews without an excessive drain on time and resources. The steps provide us with better control over the reviews in our scope and can be built on in the future.
Cochrane 综述应针对指南制定者、临床医生和公众最重要的问题。由于不可能使所有综述都保持最新，因此 Cochrane 气道组（CAG）决定在不请求额外资源的情况下优先更新和新的综述。本研究的目的是开发实用且透明的优先级排序技术，从总共 270 项 CAG 综述中确定 25-35 项高优先级更新，并对我们发布的新综述进行更有选择性的筛选。
我们使用了现有优先级排序流程中的要素，包括现有医疗保健不确定性、专家意见和决策工具。我们没有进行全面的面对面研讨会或迭代小组决策过程。
我们确定了需要更新的 30 篇综述，并计划在 2 年内完成更新。在头 18 个月内，已经发表了其中的 9 篇。
实用的优先级排序方法可以确定优先级综述，而不会过度耗费时间和资源。这些步骤使我们能够更好地控制我们范围内的综述，并可以在未来进行扩展。
