• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妊娠临床指南的持续监测:早期经验。

Continuous surveillance of a pregnancy clinical guideline: an early experience.

机构信息

Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.

CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 14;6(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0506-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-017-0506-7
PMID:28705226
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5512983/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To date there is no consensus about the optimal strategy for keeping clinical guidelines (CGs) up-to-date. The aims of this study were (1) to develop a continuous surveillance and updating strategy for CGs and (2) to test the strategy in a specific CG.

METHODS

The main steps were as follows: (1) recruiting members for the CG Updating Working Group, (2) mapping the CG, (3) identifying new evidence from the CG Updating Working Group, (4) designing and running restricted literature searches, (5) reviewing drugs and medical devices alerts, (6) screening and assessing the new evidence, (7) reviewing and, if necessary, modifying clinical questions and recommendations, and (8) updating the CG document.

RESULTS

The Pregnancy CG Updating Working Group consisted of 29 members, including clinicians, patients and caregivers, and clinical guideline methodology experts. We selected 69 clinical questions (123 recommendations) from the "Assistance during pregnancy" section. For the first update cycle (32-month duration), 9710 references were identified. Of these, 318 were pertinent, 289 were relevant, and 55 were classified as potential key references. For the second and third update cycles (6-month duration each), 2160 and 2010 references were retrieved, respectively. The continuous surveillance and updating strategy has not yet been completely implemented.

CONCLUSIONS

Further resources are needed in updating the CG field, both for implementing updating strategies and for developing methodological research.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,对于保持临床指南(CG)最新的最佳策略尚无共识。本研究的目的是(1)制定 CG 的持续监测和更新策略,以及(2)在特定 CG 中测试该策略。

方法

主要步骤如下:(1)招募 CG 更新工作组的成员,(2)绘制 CG 图,(3)从 CG 更新工作组中识别新证据,(4)设计和运行受限文献检索,(5)审查药物和医疗器械警报,(6)筛选和评估新证据,(7)审查并在必要时修改临床问题和建议,以及(8)更新 CG 文件。

结果

妊娠 CG 更新工作组由 29 名成员组成,包括临床医生、患者和护理人员以及临床指南方法学专家。我们从“妊娠期间的援助”部分选择了 69 个临床问题(123 个建议)。在第一个更新周期(32 个月的持续时间)中,共确定了 9710 条参考资料。其中,318 条相关,289 条相关,55 条被归类为潜在关键参考资料。在第二和第三个更新周期(每个周期 6 个月)中,分别检索到 2160 和 2010 条参考资料。持续监测和更新策略尚未完全实施。

结论

在更新 CG 领域需要更多资源,既需要实施更新策略,也需要开展方法学研究。

相似文献

1
Continuous surveillance of a pregnancy clinical guideline: an early experience.妊娠临床指南的持续监测:早期经验。
Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 14;6(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0506-7.
2
The UpPriority tool supported prioritization processes for updating clinical guideline questions.UpPriority 工具支持更新临床指南问题的优先级排序过程。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:149-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.07.022. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Evidence-based clinical guidelines in Kyrgyz Republic.吉尔吉斯共和国基于证据的临床指南。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S45-6. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150683.
4
Development of a prioritisation tool for the updating of clinical guideline questions: the UpPriority Tool protocol.用于更新临床指南问题的优先级排序工具的开发:UpPriority工具方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 3;7(8):e017226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017226.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
The development of clinical guidelines in China: insights from a national survey.中国临床指南的制定:全国调查的见解。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00799-7.
7
Updating contextualized clinical practice guidelines on stroke rehabilitation and low back pain management using a novel assessment framework that standardizes decisions.使用一种标准化决策的新型评估框架,更新关于中风康复和腰痛管理的情境化临床实践指南。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 4;8:643. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1588-8.
8
Updated recommendations: an assessment of NICE clinical guidelines.更新后的建议:对 NICE 临床指南的评估。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jun 11;9:72. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-72.
9
Guideline on terminology and definitions of updating clinical guidelines: The Updating Glossary.更新临床指南术语和定义指南:更新词汇表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Mar;95:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.11.023. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
10
Strategies to assess the validity of recommendations: a study protocol.评估推荐意见有效性的策略:研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 22;8:94. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-94.

引用本文的文献

1
Updated clinical guidelines experience major reporting limitations.更新后的临床指南存在重大报告局限性。
Implement Sci. 2017 Oct 12;12(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0651-3.
2
Development of a prioritisation tool for the updating of clinical guideline questions: the UpPriority Tool protocol.用于更新临床指南问题的优先级排序工具的开发:UpPriority工具方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 3;7(8):e017226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017226.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and use of a content search strategy for retrieving studies on patients' views and preferences.一种用于检索关于患者观点和偏好研究的内容搜索策略的开发与应用。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 30;15(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0698-5.
2
Methodological systematic review identifies major limitations in prioritization processes for updating.方法学系统评价确定了更新优先级过程中的主要局限性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;86:11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 24.
3
Reporting Items for Updated Clinical Guidelines: Checklist for the Reporting of Updated Guidelines (CheckUp).更新临床指南的报告项目:更新指南报告清单(CheckUp)。
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 10;14(1):e1002207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002207. eCollection 2017 Jan.
4
Recommendations for kidney disease guideline updating: a report by the KDIGO Methods Committee.肾脏病指南更新建议:KDIGO方法委员会报告
Kidney Int. 2016 Apr;89(4):753-60. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2015.11.030.
5
Efficiency of pragmatic search strategies to update clinical guidelines recommendations.实用搜索策略更新临床指南建议的效率。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Jul 31;15:57. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0058-2.
6
The validity of recommendations from clinical guidelines: a survival analysis.临床指南推荐意见的有效性:生存分析。
CMAJ. 2014 Nov 4;186(16):1211-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140547. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
7
Updated recommendations: an assessment of NICE clinical guidelines.更新后的建议:对 NICE 临床指南的评估。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jun 11;9:72. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-72.
8
Durability of class I American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guideline recommendations.I 类美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南推荐的耐久性。
JAMA. 2014 May;311(20):2092-100. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4949.
9
Guidance for updating clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review of methodological handbooks.更新临床实践指南的指南:方法手册的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 2;9:3. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-3.
10
Median life span of a cohort of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines was about 60 months.国家卫生与保健卓越研究所临床指南队列的中位寿命约为 60 个月。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;67(1):52-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Oct 16.