Zhou Lingna, Zhang Bin, Liu Jianbing, Shi Ye, Wang Jing, Yu Bin
Changzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Front Genet. 2021 Jul 21;12:690063. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.690063. eCollection 2021.
To evaluate the accuracy of Z-scores of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) in predicting 21, 18 trisomy, and X chromosome aneuploidy.
A total of 39,310 prenatal women were recruited for NIPS from September 2015 to September 2020. Interventional prenatal diagnosis was applied to verify the diagnosis of NIPS-positive results. Logistic regression analysis was employed to relate the Z-scores to the positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPS-positive results. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we calculated the optimal cutoff value of Z-scores to predict fetal chromosome aneuploidy. According to the cutoff value, NIPS-positive results were divided into the medium Z-value (MZ) and high Z-value (HZ) groups, and PPV was calculated to access the accuracy of Z-scores.
A total of 288 effective values of Z-scores were used as the final data set. The logistics regression analysis revealed that Z-scores were significantly associated with true-positive results for 21 trisomy (T21) and 18 trisomy (T18) ( < 0.05), whereas the same was not observed for X chromosome aneuploids ( > 0.05). The optimal cutoff value of the Z-score for T21, T18, XO, XXX, and XXY indicated by ROC curve analysis were 5.79, 6.05, -9.56, 5.89, and 4.47, and the area under the curve (AUC) were 0.89, 0.80, 0.48, 0.42, and 0.45, respectively. PPV in the HZ group was higher than that in the MZ group, and the application of the cutoff value reduced the false discovery rate (FDR), which was only 2.9% in the HZ group compared with 61.1% in the MZ group for T21 and T18. The difference in total PPV between the MZ and HZ groups for X chromosome aneuploids was statistically significant. Moreover, the PPV for XXX and XXY seemed to increase with Z-scores but not for XO.
The Z-score is helpful for the accurate judgment of NIPS results and for clinical prenatal counseling. Especially for T21 and T18, Z-scores have an excellent clinical association, which is superior to that seen with X chromosome aneuploids. In addition, using Z-scores to judge NIPS results offers a certain reference value for XXX and XXY but not for XO.
评估无创产前筛查(NIPS)的Z值在预测21、18三体及X染色体非整倍体方面的准确性。
2015年9月至2020年9月共招募了39310名孕妇进行NIPS。采用介入性产前诊断来验证NIPS阳性结果的诊断。运用逻辑回归分析将Z值与NIPS阳性结果的阳性预测值(PPV)相关联。通过绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,计算Z值预测胎儿染色体非整倍体的最佳截断值。根据该截断值,将NIPS阳性结果分为中等Z值(MZ)组和高Z值(HZ)组,并计算PPV以评估Z值的准确性。
共288个有效的Z值用作最终数据集。逻辑回归分析显示,Z值与21三体(T21)和18三体(T18)的真阳性结果显著相关(<0.05),而X染色体非整倍体则未观察到这种情况(>0.05)。ROC曲线分析表明,T21、T18、XO、XXX和XXY的Z值最佳截断值分别为5.79、6.05、-9.56、5.89和4.47,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.89、0.80、0.48、0.42和0.45。HZ组的PPV高于MZ组,应用截断值降低了假发现率(FDR),T21和T18的HZ组FDR仅为2.9%,而MZ组为61.1%。X染色体非整倍体的MZ组和HZ组总PPV差异有统计学意义。此外,XXX和XXY的PPV似乎随Z值增加,但XO并非如此。
Z值有助于准确判断NIPS结果及临床产前咨询。特别是对于T21和T18,Z值具有良好的临床相关性,优于X染色体非整倍体。此外,使用Z值判断NIPS结果对XXX和XXY有一定参考价值,但对XO无参考价值。