Wilson Laura A B, Balcarcel Ana, Geiger Madeleine, Heck Laura, Sánchez-Villagra Marcelo R
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales Sydney Australia.
School of Archaeology and Anthropology The Australian National University Canberra Australia.
Evol Lett. 2021 Jun 17;5(4):385-396. doi: 10.1002/evl3.231. eCollection 2021 Aug.
The neural crest hypothesis posits that selection for tameness resulted in mild alterations to neural crest cells during embryonic development, which directly or indirectly caused the appearance of traits associated with the "domestication syndrome" (DS). Although representing an appealing unitary explanation for the generation of domestic phenotypes, support for this hypothesis from morphological data and for the validity of the DS remains a topic of debate. This study used the frameworks of morphological integration and modularity to assess patterns that concern the embryonic origin of the skull and issues around the neural crest hypothesis. Geometric morphometric landmarks were used to quantify cranial trait interactions between six pairs of wild and domestic mammals, comprising representatives that express between five and 17 of the traits included in the DS, and examples from each of the pathways by which animals entered into relationships with humans. We predicted the presence of neural crest vs mesoderm modular structure to the cranium, and that elements in the neural crest module would show lower magnitudes of integration and higher disparity in domestic forms compared to wild forms. Our findings support modular structuring based on tissue origin (neural crest, mesoderm) modules, along with low module integration magnitudes for neural crest cell derived cranial elements, suggesting differential capacity for evolutionary response among those elements. Covariation between the neural crest and mesoderm modules accounted for major components of shape variation for most domestic/wild pairs. Contra to our predictions, however, we find domesticates share similar integration magnitudes to their wild progenitors, indicating that higher disparity in domesticates is not associated with magnitude changes to integration among either neural crest or mesoderm derived elements. Differences in integration magnitude among neural crest and mesoderm elements across species suggest that developmental evolution preserves a framework that promotes flexibility under the selection regimes of domestication.
神经嵴假说认为,对温顺性的选择导致胚胎发育过程中神经嵴细胞发生轻微改变,这直接或间接地导致了与“驯化综合征”(DS)相关的性状出现。尽管这一假说为家化表型的产生提供了一个有吸引力的统一解释,但来自形态学数据的支持以及DS的有效性仍是一个有争议的话题。本研究使用形态整合和模块化框架来评估与颅骨胚胎起源相关的模式以及围绕神经嵴假说的问题。几何形态测量地标被用于量化六对野生和家养哺乳动物之间的颅骨性状相互作用,这些哺乳动物包括表达DS中五到十七个性状的代表,以及动物与人类建立关系的每种途径的实例。我们预测颅骨存在基于神经嵴与中胚层的模块化结构,并且与野生形态相比,家养形态中神经嵴模块中的元素将表现出更低的整合程度和更高的差异度。我们的研究结果支持基于组织起源(神经嵴、中胚层)模块的模块化结构,以及神经嵴细胞衍生的颅骨元素的低模块整合程度,这表明这些元素之间的进化反应能力存在差异。神经嵴和中胚层模块之间的协变占大多数家养/野生对形状变异的主要成分。然而,与我们的预测相反,我们发现家养动物与其野生祖先的整合程度相似,这表明家养动物中更高的差异度与神经嵴或中胚层衍生元素之间整合程度的变化无关。跨物种的神经嵴和中胚层元素之间整合程度的差异表明,发育进化保留了一个在驯化选择机制下促进灵活性的框架。