• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度北方邦东部疫情第一波和第二波期间新冠病毒快速抗原检测与实时聚合酶链反应阳性率比较

Comparison of Positivity Rates of Rapid Antigen Testing and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for COVID-19 During the First and Second Waves of the Pandemic in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India.

作者信息

Hada Vivek, Rath Rama S, Mohanty Aroop, Sahai Rishabh, Kumar Kanishka, Kumar Subodh, Joshi Hari S, Kishore Surekha

机构信息

Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur, IND.

Community Medicine and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Jul 6;13(7):e16206. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16206. eCollection 2021 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.16206
PMID:34367808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8341255/
Abstract

Background The advent of the second wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in India caused a new range of challenges in diagnosing the virus. Various point-of-care tests have been introduced for rapid diagnosis. Although rapid antigen tests are the most commonly used, the false-negative rates are high. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the positivity rate of real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing in rapid antigen-negative cases of COVID-19 during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology This was an observational study conducted in the Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur. Results In total, 2,168 patients were tested. The percentage positivity rate of the RT-PCR tests among the antigen-negative samples was 4.34% in the first wave of the pandemic whereas it was 8.08% in the second wave. Conclusions The main conclusion of this study was that antigen tests should never be used alone for the diagnosis of COVID-19. Instead, they should be confirmed with a RT-PCR test.

摘要

背景 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)第二波疫情在印度的出现给病毒诊断带来了一系列新挑战。为实现快速诊断,已推出了各种即时检测方法。尽管快速抗原检测是最常用的,但假阴性率很高。因此,本研究的目的是比较在 COVID-19 大流行的第一波和第二波期间,COVID-19 快速抗原检测阴性病例中实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测的阳性率。方法 这是一项在戈勒克布尔全印度医学科学研究所微生物学系进行的观察性研究。结果 总共对 2168 名患者进行了检测。在大流行的第一波中,抗原阴性样本中 RT-PCR 检测的阳性率为 4.34%,而在第二波中为 8.08%。结论 本研究的主要结论是,抗原检测绝不应单独用于 COVID-19 的诊断。相反,应用 RT-PCR 检测进行确认。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/8341255/89c2c8ae9b4e/cureus-0013-00000016206-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/8341255/21f416403b33/cureus-0013-00000016206-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/8341255/e3aab6a0db5b/cureus-0013-00000016206-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/8341255/89c2c8ae9b4e/cureus-0013-00000016206-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/8341255/21f416403b33/cureus-0013-00000016206-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/8341255/e3aab6a0db5b/cureus-0013-00000016206-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d23/8341255/89c2c8ae9b4e/cureus-0013-00000016206-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Positivity Rates of Rapid Antigen Testing and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for COVID-19 During the First and Second Waves of the Pandemic in Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦东部疫情第一波和第二波期间新冠病毒快速抗原检测与实时聚合酶链反应阳性率比较
Cureus. 2021 Jul 6;13(7):e16206. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16206. eCollection 2021 Jul.
2
Evolution of the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of the Brunt of the Second and Third Waves on Patients in Western Uttar Pradesh.新冠疫情的演变:对北方邦西部第二波和第三波疫情冲击患者情况的分析
Cureus. 2022 Sep 17;14(9):e29251. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29251. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Differences in age distribution in first and second waves of COVID-19 in eastern Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦东部地区 COVID-19 第一波和第二波的年龄分布差异。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 Nov-Dec;15(6):102327. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102327. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
4
Comparison of the Rapid Antigen Testing Method With RT-qPCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19.用于诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎的快速抗原检测方法与逆转录定量聚合酶链反应的比较
Cureus. 2021 Aug 24;13(8):e17405. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17405. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody tests on capillary whole blood samples from the fingertip.评价两种 SARS-CoV-2 快速 IgM-IgG 联合抗体检测试剂盒在指尖毛细血管全血样本中的性能。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0237694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237694. eCollection 2020.
6
Evaluation of sample pooling for diagnosis of COVID-19 by real time-PCR: A resource-saving combat strategy.实时荧光定量 PCR 检测新冠病毒样本混合检测的评价:一种节约资源的防控策略。
J Med Virol. 2021 Mar;93(3):1526-1531. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26475. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
7
Rapid Serological Assays and SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2: Comparative Study.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的快速血清学检测和SARS-CoV-2实时聚合酶链反应检测:比较研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 30;22(10):e19152. doi: 10.2196/19152.
8
[SARS-CoV-2 and Microbiological Diagnostic Dynamics in COVID-19 Pandemic].[严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2与2019冠状病毒病大流行中的微生物诊断动态]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2020 Jul;54(3):497-509. doi: 10.5578/mb.69839.
9
COVID-19 and Cancer: A Comparison of the Two Important Pandemic Waves in an Indian Cancer Patients' Cohort.2019冠状病毒病与癌症:印度癌症患者队列中两次重要疫情浪潮的比较
South Asian J Cancer. 2023 Aug 24;13(1):57-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772702. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
Performance Evaluation of Serial SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Testing During a Nursing Home Outbreak.养老院内爆发期间对连续 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的性能评估。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jul;174(7):945-951. doi: 10.7326/M21-0422. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Self-Administered Rapid Antigen Tests (RATs) Help Rural India? An Evaluation of the CoviSelf Kit as a Response to the 2019-2022 COVID-19 Pandemic.自我管理的快速抗原检测(RATs)能帮助印度农村地区吗?对CoviSelf试剂盒作为应对2019 - 2022年新冠疫情的评估。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 6;12(3):644. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030644.

本文引用的文献

1
Corona health-care warriors in India: knowledge, attitude, and practices during COVID-19 outbreak.印度抗击新冠疫情的医护人员:新冠疫情爆发期间的知识、态度和做法
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Feb 27;10:44. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_524_20. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19.COVID-19 的快速抗原检测比较。
Viruses. 2020 Dec 10;12(12):1420. doi: 10.3390/v12121420.
3
Nucleic acid amplification tests on respiratory samples for the diagnosis of coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
呼吸道样本核酸扩增检测用于冠状病毒感染诊断的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):341-351. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
4
Global perspective of COVID-19 epidemiology for a full-cycle pandemic.COVID-19 流行病学的全球视角——全周期大流行。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Dec;50(12):e13423. doi: 10.1111/eci.13423. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
5
Mutations on COVID-19 diagnostic targets.新冠病毒诊断靶标突变。
Genomics. 2020 Nov;112(6):5204-5213. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.09.028. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
6
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于诊断SARS-CoV-2感染的快速即时护理抗原检测和基于分子的检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 26;8(8):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.
7
Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.隔离、检测、接触者追踪和保持社交距离在不同环境下减少 SARS-CoV-2 传播的效果:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151-1160. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30457-6. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
8
Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA identified in Eastern India: Possible implications for the ongoing outbreak in India and impact on viral structure and host susceptibility.在印度东部发现的 SARS-CoV-2 病毒 RNA 突变:对印度当前疫情爆发的可能影响及对病毒结构和宿主易感性的影响。
J Biosci. 2020;45(1). doi: 10.1007/s12038-020-00046-1.
9
Low performance of rapid antigen detection test as frontline testing for COVID-19 diagnosis.快速抗原检测试验在 COVID-19 诊断中的一线检测性能不佳。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104455. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104455. Epub 2020 May 21.