Zacharia Balaji, Pai Puneeth Katapadi, Paul Manu
Department of Orthopedics, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
J Patient Exp. 2021 Jul 26;8:23743735211034276. doi: 10.1177/23743735211034276. eCollection 2021.
Patient-based outcomes (patient-reported outcomes) of any intervention can change according to factors like age, gender, region, culture, education, and socioeconomic status. Most of the available outcome measuring tools have a surgeon-related bias. Focus group discussion (FGD) is a simple and effective way to assess the outcome of an intervention. In FGD, people from similar backgrounds and experiences discuss a specific topic of interest. Our objective is to discuss the problems of common outcome measuring tools for patient satisfaction and to understand the method of conducting an FGD. We have set our own published article on patient-based outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as an example for explaining the method of conducting an FGD. The planning, advantages, disadvantages, practicalities, and problems of conducting an FGD are explained. In conclusion, many of the tools used for assessing patient satisfaction is surgeon-centered. Focus group discussion is simple, cost-effective, requiring a small number of participants, and can be completed in a short period. It is an effective tool for assessing patient-based outcomes in TKA.
任何干预措施基于患者的结果(患者报告的结果)会因年龄、性别、地区、文化、教育和社会经济地位等因素而有所变化。大多数现有的结果测量工具都存在与外科医生相关的偏差。焦点小组讨论(FGD)是评估干预措施结果的一种简单有效的方法。在焦点小组讨论中,背景和经历相似的人会讨论一个感兴趣的特定话题。我们的目的是讨论用于患者满意度的常见结果测量工具存在的问题,并了解进行焦点小组讨论的方法。我们以自己发表的关于全膝关节置换术(TKA)后基于患者的结果的文章为例,解释进行焦点小组讨论的方法。文中解释了进行焦点小组讨论的规划、优点、缺点、实用性和问题。总之,许多用于评估患者满意度的工具是以外科医生为中心的。焦点小组讨论简单、成本效益高,所需参与者数量少,且能在短时间内完成。它是评估TKA中基于患者的结果的有效工具。