Greenwood Nan, Ellmers Theresa, Holley Jess
Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, St George's University of London and Kingston University, 2nd Floor Grosvenor Wing, St George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Sep 20;14:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-107.
Focus groups are commonly used to explore participants' experiences in health and social care research. Although it is suggested that having demographically homogenous groups may help put participants at ease, the evidence is sparse.The aims of the paper are to: explore the impact of relative ethnic homogeneity and heterogeneity of focus group participants on the group discussions; improve understanding of homogeneity and heterogeneity in focus groups; suggest ways to operationalise concepts such as being 'more comfortable' with other focus group participants.
Digitally recorded focus groups were undertaken with family carers of stroke survivors and were later transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. Groups were designated as more or less ethnically homogenous. More homogenous groups included, for example, only White British or Asian Indian participants whilst more heterogeneous groups comprised a mixture of, for example, Asian, White British and Black Caribbean participants.
Forty-one carers participated in seven focus groups. Analysis revealed differences in discussions around ethnicity between the more or less ethnically homogenous groups. For example, participants in more ethnically homogenous focus groups were more likely to say ethnicity might influence perceptions of social care services. On the other hand, more heterogeneous groups emphasised similarity in carers' experiences, irrespective of ethnicity. Participants in the more homogenous groups were also more likely to make potentially controversial comments relating to ethnic differences. Additionally they appeared to be more at ease with each other discussing the topic. For example, they spontaneously mentioned ethnic differences earlier in these groups.In contrast, analysis of topics not specifically related to ethnicity, such as the difficult experiences of being a carer, produced no discernible patterns when comparing more and less homogenous focus groups.
Considerations around focus group participant demographic homogeneity and heterogeneity are complex and these terms may be most usefully applied only in relative terms.Data derived from more homogenous groups complement data from more heterogeneous groups providing different perspectives. Depending on the focus of the discussion, having characteristics in common, such as being a carer can override other differences.
焦点小组常用于探索健康与社会护理研究中参与者的经历。尽管有观点认为人口统计学上同质化的小组可能有助于让参与者放松,但相关证据稀少。本文的目的是:探讨焦点小组参与者相对的种族同质性和异质性对小组讨论的影响;增进对焦点小组中同质性和异质性的理解;提出一些方法来落实诸如与其他焦点小组参与者“更自在”等概念。
对中风幸存者的家庭照料者进行了数字录音的焦点小组访谈,之后进行转录并采用框架分析法进行分析。小组被划分为种族同质性较高或较低的类型。例如,同质性较高的小组仅包括英国白人或亚洲印度裔参与者,而异质性较高的小组则由亚洲人、英国白人和加勒比黑人等混合组成。
41名照料者参与了7个焦点小组。分析揭示了种族同质性较高或较低的小组在围绕种族的讨论上存在差异。例如,种族同质性较高的焦点小组的参与者更有可能表示种族可能会影响对社会护理服务的看法。另一方面,异质性较高的小组强调照料者经历的相似性,而不论种族如何。同质性较高小组的参与者也更有可能就种族差异发表可能有争议的评论。此外,他们在彼此讨论该话题时似乎更自在。例如,他们在这些小组中更早地自发提及种族差异。相比之下,在比较同质性较高和较低的焦点小组时,对诸如作为照料者的艰难经历等与种族无特定关联的话题的分析未发现明显模式。
关于焦点小组参与者人口统计学同质性和异质性的考量很复杂,这些术语可能仅在相对意义上最有用。来自同质性较高小组的数据补充了来自异质性较高小组的数据,提供了不同的视角。根据讨论的重点,拥有共同特征,如作为照料者,可以超越其他差异。