1 Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
2 University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(10):1483-1496. doi: 10.1177/1049732318821692. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
Saturation is commonly used to determine sample sizes in qualitative research, yet there is little guidance on what influences saturation. We aimed to assess saturation and identify parameters to estimate sample sizes for focus group studies in advance of data collection. We used two approaches to assess saturation in data from 10 focus group discussions. Four focus groups were sufficient to identify a range of new issues (code saturation), but more groups were needed to fully understand these issues (meaning saturation). Group stratification influenced meaning saturation, whereby one focus group per stratum was needed to identify issues; two groups per stratum provided a more comprehensive understanding of issues, but more groups per stratum provided little additional benefit. We identify six parameters influencing saturation in focus group data: study purpose, type of codes, group stratification, number of groups per stratum, and type and degree of saturation.
饱和度通常用于确定定性研究的样本量,但对于影响饱和度的因素几乎没有指导。我们旨在评估饱和度,并确定在收集数据之前估算焦点小组研究样本量的参数。我们使用两种方法来评估来自 10 个焦点小组讨论的数据的饱和度。四个焦点小组足以识别一系列新问题(代码饱和度),但需要更多的小组来充分了解这些问题(含义饱和度)。组分层会影响含义饱和度,因此每个层需要一个焦点小组来识别问题;每个层两个小组可以更全面地了解问题,但每个层更多的小组则几乎没有额外的好处。我们确定了影响焦点小组数据饱和度的六个参数:研究目的、代码类型、组分层、每个层的小组数量以及类型和饱和度程度。