Stroup W H, Peeler J T, Smith K
Food and Drug Administration, Division of Food Chemistry and Technology, Cincinnati, OH 45226.
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1987 Nov-Dec;70(6):955-7.
The precision of instruments used in 3 collaborative studies conducted within the Food and Drug Administration over a 4-year period (1981, 1982, 1984) for water activity (aw) determinations according to the official AOAC method is evaluated. Calibration responses of the instruments were tested for linearity over the aw range from 0.75 to 0.97. Average absolute percent difference between predicted and assigned aw values for the linear model ranged from 0.3 to 0.7% for a fiber-dimensional hygrometer (Abbeon) and 3 electrical hygrometers (Beckman, Rotronics, and Weather Measure). The calibration responses for another electrical hygrometer (Hygrodynamics) were nonlinear. The fiber-dimensional hygrometer yielded mean aw values and precision estimates that did not differ significantly from those obtained with the electrical hygrometers for (NH4)2SO4slush, KNO3 slush, sweetened condensed milk, pancake syrup, and cheese spread. However, the mean aw value for a soy sauce was 0.838 for the electrical hygrometers compared with 0.911 for the fiber-dimensional hygrometer. The fiber-dimensional hygrometer was affected by a volatile component(s) in the soy sauce that caused an erroneously high aw value. Pooled estimates of reproducibility (Sx) in the 3 studies were 0.008 for the fiber-dimensional hygrometer and 0.010 for the electrical hygrometers; these values were not significantly different from those reported in the study that verified the current official AOAC method.
对美国食品药品监督管理局在4年期间(1981年、1982年、1984年)开展的3项合作研究中用于按照美国官方分析化学家协会(AOAC)官方方法测定水分活度(aw)的仪器的精度进行了评估。测试了这些仪器在aw范围从0.75至0.97的校准响应的线性。对于纤维尺寸湿度计(Abbeon)和3种电子湿度计(贝克曼、Rotronics和Weather Measure),线性模型的预测aw值与指定aw值之间的平均绝对百分比差异在0.3%至0.7%之间。另一种电子湿度计(Hygrodynamics)的校准响应是非线性的。对于硫酸铵淤浆、硝酸钾淤浆、甜炼乳、煎饼糖浆和奶酪酱,纤维尺寸湿度计得出的平均aw值和精度估计与电子湿度计获得的结果没有显著差异。然而,对于电子湿度计,酱油的平均aw值为0.838,而纤维尺寸湿度计的为0.911。纤维尺寸湿度计受到酱油中挥发性成分的影响,导致aw值错误地偏高。在这3项研究中,纤维尺寸湿度计的合并再现性估计值(Sx)为0.008,电子湿度计为0.010;这些值与验证当前AOAC官方方法的研究中报告的值没有显著差异。