Suppr超能文献

每周一次替西帕肽与每日一次德谷胰岛素联用,或不联用 SGLT2 抑制剂,作为二甲双胍的附加疗法治疗 2 型糖尿病患者(SURPASS-3):一项随机、开放标签、平行分组、3 期临床试验。

Once-weekly tirzepatide versus once-daily insulin degludec as add-on to metformin with or without SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-3): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

1st Medical Department and Karl Landsteiner Institute for Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Landstrasse Clinic, Vienna Health Association, Vienna, Austria.

University of Bari Aldo Moro, University Hospital Policlinico Consorziale, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Lancet. 2021 Aug 14;398(10300):583-598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01443-4. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tirzepatide is a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and GLP-1 receptor agonist under development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus titrated insulin degludec in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by metformin with or without SGLT2 inhibitors.

METHODS

In this open-label, parallel-group, multicentre (122 sites), multinational (13 countries), phase 3 study, eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) had a baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA) of 7·0-10·5%, body-mass index of at least 25 kg/m, stable weight, and were insulin-naive and treated with metformin alone or in combination with an SGLT2 inhibitor for at least 3 months before screening. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), using an interactive web-response system, to once-weekly subcutaneous injection of tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg) or once-daily subcutaneous injection of titrated insulin degludec, and were stratified by country, HbA, and concomitant use of oral antihyperglycaemic medications. Tirzepatide was initially given at 2·5 mg and the dose was escalated by 2·5 mg every 4 weeks until the assigned dose was reached. Insulin degludec was initially given at 10 U per day and was titrated once weekly to a fasting self-monitored blood glucose of less than 5·0 mmol/L (<90 mg/dL), following a treat-to-target algorithm, for 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was non-inferiority of tirzepatide 10 mg or 15 mg, or both, versus insulin degludec in mean change from baseline in HbA at week 52. Key secondary efficacy endpoints were non-inferiority of tirzepatide 5 mg versus insulin degludec in mean change from baseline in HbA at week 52, superiority of all doses of tirzepatide versus insulin degludec in mean change from baseline in HbA and bodyweight, and the proportion of participants achieving HbA of less than 7·0% (<53 mmol/mol) at week 52. We used a boundary of 0·3% to establish non-inferiority in HbA difference between treatments. Efficacy and safety analyses were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all participants who received at least one dose of study drug). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03882970, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between April 1 and Nov 15, 2019, we assessed 1947 participants for eligibility, 1444 of whom were randomly assigned to treatment. The modified intention-to-treat population was 1437 participants from the tirzepatide 5 mg (n=358), tirzepatide 10 mg (n=360), tirzepatide 15 mg (n=359), and insulin degludec (n=360) groups. From a mean baseline HbA of 8·17% (SD 0·91), the reductions in HbA at week 52 were 1·93% (SE 0·05) for tirzepatide 5 mg, 2·20% (0·05) for tirzepatide 10 mg, and 2·37% (0·05) for tirzepatide 15 mg, and 1·34% (0·05) for insulin degludec. The non-inferiority margin of 0·3% was met. The estimated treatment difference (ETD) versus insulin degludec ranged from -0·59% to -1·04% for tirzepatide (p<0·0001 for all tirzepatide doses). The proportion of participants achieving a HbA of less than 7·0% (<53 mmol/mol) at week 52 was greater (p<0·0001) in all three tirzepatide groups (82%-93%) versus insulin degludec (61%). At week 52, from a baseline of 94·3 kg (SD 20·1), all three tirzepatide doses decreased bodyweight (-7·5 kg to -12·9 kg), whereas insulin degludec increased bodyweight by 2·3 kg. The ETD versus insulin degludec ranged from -9·8 kg to -15·2 kg for tirzepatide (p<0·0001 for all tirzepatide doses). The most common adverse events in tirzepatide-treated participants were mild to moderate gastrointestinal events that decreased over time. A higher incidence of nausea (12-24%), diarrhoea (15-17%), decreased appetite (6-12%), and vomiting (6-10%) was reported in participants treated with tirzepatide than in those treated with insulin degludec (2%, 4%, 1%, and 1%, respectively). Hypoglycaemia (<54 mg/dL or severe) was reported in five (1%), four (1%), and eight (2%) participants on tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg, respectively, versus 26 (7%) on insulin degludec. Treatment discontinuation due to an adverse event was more common in the tirzepatide groups than in the insulin degludec group. Five participants died during the study; none of the deaths were considered by the investigators to be related to the study treatment.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with type 2 diabetes, tirzepatide (5, 10, and 15 mg) was superior to titrated insulin degludec, with greater reductions in HbA and bodyweight at week 52 and a lower risk of hypoglycaemia. Tirzepatide showed a similar safety profile to that of GLP-1 receptor agonists.

FUNDING

Eli Lilly and Company.

摘要

背景

替西帕肽是一种新型双重葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素促分泌多肽和 GLP-1 受体激动剂,正在开发用于治疗 2 型糖尿病。我们旨在评估替西帕肽与滴定后的德谷胰岛素在二甲双胍联合或不联合 SGLT2 抑制剂治疗下血糖控制仍不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项开放标签、平行组、多中心(122 个地点)、多国(13 个国家)、3 期研究中,符合条件的参与者(年龄≥18 岁)基线糖化血红蛋白(HbA)为 7.0-10.5%,体重指数至少为 25kg/m²,稳定体重,且在筛选前无胰岛素治疗,单独使用二甲双胍或联合使用 SGLT2 抑制剂治疗至少 3 个月。参与者随机(1:1:1:1)分组,使用交互式网络响应系统,每周一次皮下注射替西帕肽(5、10 或 15mg)或每日一次皮下注射滴定后的德谷胰岛素,并按国家、HbA 和同时使用口服降糖药物进行分层。替西帕肽最初给予 2.5mg,并每 4 周增加 2.5mg,直到达到指定剂量。德谷胰岛素最初给予 10U/天,根据治疗目标算法,每周调整一次空腹自我监测血糖至<5.0mmol/L(<90mg/dL),持续 52 周。主要疗效终点是替西帕肽 10mg 或 15mg,或两者联合与德谷胰岛素相比,在第 52 周时 HbA 的平均变化不劣效。主要次要疗效终点是替西帕肽 5mg 与德谷胰岛素相比,在第 52 周时 HbA 的平均变化不劣效,所有剂量的替西帕肽与德谷胰岛素相比,HbA 和体重的平均变化更优,以及在第 52 周时 HbA<7.0%(<53mmol/mol)的参与者比例。我们使用 0.3%的边界来建立治疗之间 HbA 差异的非劣效性。采用改良意向治疗人群(所有至少接受过一次研究药物治疗的参与者)进行疗效和安全性分析。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT03882970,现已完成。

结果

2019 年 4 月 1 日至 11 月 15 日,我们评估了 1947 名符合条件的参与者,其中 1444 名被随机分配至治疗组。在替西帕肽 5mg(n=358)、替西帕肽 10mg(n=360)、替西帕肽 15mg(n=359)和德谷胰岛素(n=360)组的改良意向治疗人群中,有 1437 名参与者。从平均基线 HbA 8.17%(SD 0.91)开始,第 52 周时的 HbA 降低幅度为替西帕肽 5mg 组 1.93%(SE 0.05),替西帕肽 10mg 组 2.20%(0.05),替西帕肽 15mg 组 2.37%(0.05)和德谷胰岛素组 1.34%(0.05)。0.3%的非劣效性边界得到满足。替西帕肽与德谷胰岛素相比,治疗差异(ETD)的范围为-0.59%至-1.04%(所有替西帕肽剂量均<0.0001)。在第 52 周时,HbA<7.0%(<53mmol/mol)的参与者比例在所有三个替西帕肽组(82%-93%)中均高于德谷胰岛素组(61%)(均<0.0001)。在第 52 周时,所有三个替西帕肽组的体重均从基线的 94.3kg(SD 20.1kg)下降(-7.5kg 至-12.9kg),而德谷胰岛素组的体重增加了 2.3kg。替西帕肽与德谷胰岛素相比,ETD 的范围为-9.8kg 至-15.2kg(所有替西帕肽剂量均<0.0001)。替西帕肽治疗组最常见的不良反应为轻度至中度胃肠道事件,随时间推移逐渐减少。与德谷胰岛素组相比,接受替西帕肽治疗的参与者中恶心(12-24%)、腹泻(15-17%)、食欲下降(6-12%)和呕吐(6-10%)的发生率更高(分别为 2%、4%、1%和 1%)。接受替西帕肽 5、10 和 15mg 的参与者分别有 5%(1 例)、4%(1 例)和 8%(2 例)报告发生低血糖(<54mg/dL 或严重),而接受德谷胰岛素的参与者有 7%(26 例)报告发生低血糖。替西帕肽组因不良反应而停药的比例高于德谷胰岛素组。在研究期间有 5 名参与者死亡;研究者认为没有死亡与研究治疗有关。

解释

在 2 型糖尿病患者中,替西帕肽(5、10 和 15mg)优于滴定后的德谷胰岛素,第 52 周时 HbA 和体重的降低幅度更大,低血糖的风险更低。替西帕肽与 GLP-1 受体激动剂具有相似的安全性。

资金来源

礼来公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验