Dallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, TX, USA.
MultiCare Rockwood Clinic, Spokane, WA, USA.
Lancet. 2021 Jul 10;398(10295):143-155. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01324-6. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
Despite advancements in care, many people with type 2 diabetes do not meet treatment goals; thus, development of new therapies is needed. We aimed to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide monotherapy versus placebo in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by diet and exercise alone.
We did a 40-week, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (SURPASS-1), at 52 medical research centres and hospitals in India, Japan, Mexico, and the USA. Adult participants (≥18 years) were included if they had type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by diet and exercise alone and if they were naive to injectable diabetes therapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) via computer-generated random sequence to once a week tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg), or placebo. All participants, investigators, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the mean change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA) from baseline at 40 weeks. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03954834.
From June 3, 2019, to Oct 28, 2020, of 705 individuals assessed for eligibility, 478 (mean baseline HbA 7·9% [63 mmol/mol], age 54·1 years [SD 11·9], 231 [48%] women, diabetes duration 4·7 years, and body-mass index 31·9 kg/m) were randomly assigned to tirzepatide 5 mg (n=121 [25%]), tirzepatide 10 mg (n=121 [25%]), tirzepatide 15 mg (n=121 [25%]), or placebo (n=115 [24%]). 66 (14%) participants discontinued the study drug and 50 (10%) discontinued the study prematurely. At 40 weeks, all tirzepatide doses were superior to placebo for changes from baseline in HbA, fasting serum glucose, bodyweight, and HbA targets of less than 7·0% (<53 mmol/mol) and less than 5·7% (<39 mmol/mol). Mean HbA decreased from baseline by 1·87% (20 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 5 mg, 1·89% (21 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 10 mg, and 2·07% (23 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 15 mg versus +0·04% with placebo (+0·4 mmol/mol), resulting in estimated treatment differences versus placebo of -1·91% (-21 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 5 mg, -1·93% (-21 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 10 mg, and -2·11% (-23 mmol/mol) with tirzepatide 15 mg (all p<0·0001). More participants on tirzepatide than on placebo met HbA targets of less than 7·0% (<53 mmol/mol; 87-92% vs 20%) and 6·5% or less (≤48 mmol/mol; 81-86% vs 10%) and 31-52% of patients on tirzepatide versus 1% on placebo reached an HbA of less than 5·7% (<39 mmol/mol). Tirzepatide induced a dose-dependent bodyweight loss ranging from 7·0 to 9·5 kg. The most frequent adverse events with tirzepatide were mild to moderate and transient gastrointestinal events, including nausea (12-18% vs 6%), diarrhoea (12-14% vs 8%), and vomiting (2-6% vs 2%). No clinically significant (<54 mg/dL [<3 mmol/L]) or severe hypoglycaemia were reported with tirzepatide. One death occurred in the placebo group.
Tirzepatide showed robust improvements in glycaemic control and bodyweight, without increased risk of hypoglycaemia. The safety profile was consistent with GLP-1 receptor agonists, indicating a potential monotherapy use of tirzepatide for type 2 diabetes treatment.
Eli Lilly and Company.
尽管在治疗方面取得了进展,但许多 2 型糖尿病患者仍未达到治疗目标;因此,需要开发新的治疗方法。我们旨在评估新型双重葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素促分泌多肽和 GLP-1 受体激动剂替西帕肽单药治疗与安慰剂在饮食和运动单独控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
我们在印度、日本、墨西哥和美国的 52 个医学研究中心和医院进行了一项为期 40 周、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、3 期试验(SURPASS-1)。纳入的成年参与者(≥18 岁)如果仅通过饮食和运动不能很好地控制 2 型糖尿病,且对注射用糖尿病治疗药物无经验,则可以纳入。参与者通过计算机生成的随机序列以 1:1:1:1 的比例随机分配至每周一次替西帕肽(5、10 或 15mg)或安慰剂。所有参与者、研究者和赞助商都对治疗分配进行了盲法。主要终点是 40 周时与基线相比糖化血红蛋白(HbA)的平均变化。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT03954834。
从 2019 年 6 月 3 日至 2020 年 10 月 28 日,对 705 名符合入选标准的患者进行了评估,其中 478 名(平均基线 HbA 7.9%[63mmol/mol],年龄 54.1 岁[SD 11.9],231 名[48%]女性,糖尿病病程 4.7 年,体重指数 31.9kg/m)被随机分配至替西帕肽 5mg(n=121[25%])、替西帕肽 10mg(n=121[25%])、替西帕肽 15mg(n=121[25%])或安慰剂(n=115[24%])。66 名(14%)参与者停止了研究药物治疗,50 名(10%)提前终止了研究。40 周时,与安慰剂相比,所有替西帕肽剂量在 HbA、空腹血清葡萄糖、体重和 HbA 目标(<7.0%[<53mmol/mol]和<5.7%[<39mmol/mol])方面均有显著改善。替西帕肽 5mg 组、替西帕肽 10mg 组和替西帕肽 15mg 组的平均 HbA 分别从基线下降 1.87%(20mmol/mol)、1.89%(21mmol/mol)和 2.07%(23mmol/mol),而安慰剂组仅下降 0.04%(0.4mmol/mol),与安慰剂相比,替西帕肽 5mg 组、替西帕肽 10mg 组和替西帕肽 15mg 组的治疗差异估计分别为-1.91%(-21mmol/mol)、-1.93%(-21mmol/mol)和-2.11%(-23mmol/mol)(均 P<0.0001)。与安慰剂相比,更多的替西帕肽组患者达到了 HbA 目标值(<7.0%[<53mmol/mol];87-92% 比 20%)和 6.5%或更低(≤48mmol/mol;81-86% 比 10%),而替西帕肽组中有 31-52%的患者,而安慰剂组中仅有 1%的患者达到了 HbA 水平<5.7%(<39mmol/mol)。替西帕肽诱导了剂量依赖性的体重减轻,范围为 7.0 至 9.5kg。替西帕肽最常见的不良反应为轻度至中度和短暂的胃肠道事件,包括恶心(12-18% 比 6%)、腹泻(12-14% 比 8%)和呕吐(2-6% 比 2%)。替西帕肽组未报告有临床意义的(<54mg/dL [<3mmol/L])或严重低血糖。安慰剂组有 1 例死亡。
替西帕肽在改善血糖控制和体重方面显示出了显著的效果,且没有增加低血糖的风险。安全性与 GLP-1 受体激动剂一致,这表明替西帕肽有可能作为 2 型糖尿病的单一治疗药物使用。
礼来公司。