文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

充气阴茎植入物满意度调查问卷(SSIPI)的编制与验证。

Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI).

机构信息

Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2021 Sep;18(9):1641-1651. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.020. Epub 2021 Aug 7.


DOI:10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.020
PMID:34373212
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9472697/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: No validated English language patient-reported outcome (PRO) currently exists that assesses satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Satisfaction data have been largely based primarily on surgeon assessment of patients or using questionnaires that have not been designed for this purpose. AIM: To develop an English-language validated PRO that assesses patient satisfaction after IPP surgery. METHODS: Initially, a literature review and discussions with experts defined domains important to IPP satisfaction (pain, appearance, function, overall satisfaction). The initial 35-item Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI) was developed. Cognitive interviews were then performed with IPP patients (n = 12) to gain feedback on the SSIPI domains and items. These data were used to modify SSIPI with the addition of 2 questions for a final item number of 37. Patients from 4 centers, who were between 6 months and 5 years after IPP, were administered the questionnaire through RedCap. Reliability statistics and content analysis were used to winnow questions to yield the final 16-item version of the SSIPI. Internal consistency was assessed via Cronbach's alpha and item-total correlation. Test-retest reliability was assessed via intraclass correlation coefficients using baseline and 2-week data. For convergent validity, the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and the Self-Esteem and Relationship (SEAR) questionnaire were used. For discriminant validity, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the factor structure of the SSIPI. OUTCOMES: Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and confirmatory factor analysis were assessed. RESULTS: 118 men were surveyed. Mean age was 66.8 ± 9.5 years. The 16-item SSIPI showed high internal consistency with an overall Cronbach's Alpha of 0.97 (domains 0.85-0.89). Item-total correlations for individual items to subscales ranged from 0.60 to 0.91. The overall test-retest reliability was 0.94 (domains 0.87-0.93). Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and Self-Esteem and Relationship had correlations of 0.84 overall (domains 0.57-0.79) and 0.47 overall (domains 0.34-0.44), respectively. International Prostate Symptom Score (discriminant validity) had correlations of -0.29 overall (domains -0.17 to -0.31). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: SSIPI is the first English-language validated IPP satisfaction PRO. This will enable clinicians to collect satisfaction data in a standardized way. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: As strengths we have used a rigorous psychometric process and have no industry sponsorship. Limitations include small numbers of specific subpopulations. CONCLUSION: The SSIPI has demonstrated robust psychometric properties. Salter CA, Bach PV, Jenkins L, et al. Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI). J Sex Med 2021;18:1641-1651.

摘要

背景:目前尚不存在经过验证的英文患者报告结局(PRO)评估可充气阴茎假体(IPP)满意度。满意度数据主要基于医生对患者的评估或使用并非为此目的设计的问卷。

目的:开发一种经过验证的评估 IPP 手术后患者满意度的英文 PRO。

方法:最初,通过文献回顾和与专家讨论,确定了与 IPP 满意度相关的重要领域(疼痛、外观、功能、总体满意度)。最初的 35 项可充气阴茎植入物满意度调查(SSIPI)由此产生。然后对 12 名 IPP 患者进行认知访谈,以获取有关 SSIPI 领域和项目的反馈。这些数据用于修改 SSIPI,增加了 2 个问题,最终项目数量为 37 个。来自 4 个中心的、IPP 后 6 个月至 5 年的患者通过 RedCap 完成了问卷。使用可靠性统计和内容分析来筛选问题,得出最终的 16 项 SSIPI 版本。通过 Cronbach's alpha 和项目总分相关性评估内部一致性。使用基线和 2 周的数据评估测试-重测信度,通过组内相关系数进行评估。为了评估收敛效度,使用了治疗满意度勃起功能障碍问卷和自尊与关系(SEAR)问卷。为了评估判别效度,使用了国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)。使用验证性因子分析评估 SSIPI 的因子结构。

结果:对 118 名男性进行了调查。平均年龄为 66.8±9.5 岁。16 项 SSIPI 显示出较高的内部一致性,总体 Cronbach's Alpha 为 0.97(领域为 0.85-0.89)。各个项目与子量表的总分相关性范围为 0.60 至 0.91。总体测试-重测可靠性为 0.94(领域为 0.87-0.93)。治疗满意度勃起功能障碍问卷和自尊与关系的总体相关性分别为 0.84(领域为 0.57-0.79)和 0.47(领域为 0.34-0.44)。国际前列腺症状评分(判别效度)的总体相关性为-0.29(领域为-0.17 至-0.31)。

结论:SSIPI 是第一个经过验证的 IPP 满意度的英文 PRO。这将使临床医生能够以标准化的方式收集满意度数据。

优势和局限性:我们的优势在于使用了严格的心理计量学过程,且没有行业赞助。局限性包括特定亚人群数量较少。

结论:SSIPI 具有良好的心理计量学特性。

相似文献

[1]
Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI).

J Sex Med. 2021-9

[2]
Evaluation of patient satisfaction using the validated French version of the SSIPI questionnaire after inflatable penile implantation.

J Sex Med. 2023-12-22

[3]
[French language validation of the SSIPI questionnaire assessing the satisfaction of patients with penile implant].

Prog Urol. 2023-1

[4]
A Survey of Usage of Penile Prosthesis.

J Sex Med. 2020-11

[5]
Evaluation of Quality of Life After Inflatable Penile Implantation and Analysis of Factors Influencing Postsurgery Patient Satisfaction.

J Sex Med. 2022-9

[6]
Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.

J Sex Med. 2019-9-6

[7]
The Absence of a Validated English-Language Survey to Assess Prosthesis Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Using the Sexual Quality of Life After Penile Prosthesis.

J Sex Med. 2020-11

[8]
A questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: quality of life and sexuality with penile prosthesis (QoLSPP): to what extent does the implant affect the patient's life?

J Sex Med. 2014-2-18

[9]
High patient satisfaction after inflatable penile prostheses implantation correlates with female partner satisfaction.

J Sex Med. 2013-9-12

[10]
Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Pelvic Radiation: Technical Considerations and Contemporary Outcomes.

J Sex Med. 2018-5-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Quality of life outcomes following penile prosthesis insertion in the post-ischaemic priapism setting.

Int J Impot Res. 2025-7-25

[2]
Comment on: Penile prosthesis implantation is safe and effective in Peyronie's Disease patients with and without erectile dysfunction.

Int J Impot Res. 2025-1

[3]
Commentary on: Long-term experience with AMS-700 CXR inflatable penile prosthesis in high-risk patients with corporal fibrosis.

Int J Impot Res. 2024-9-26

[4]
Long-term experience with AMS-700 CXR inflatable penile prosthesis in high-risk patients with corporal fibrosis.

Int J Impot Res. 2025-1

[5]
Assessing psychiatric risk with a focus on optimizing patient satisfaction with penile prosthesis placement-a narrative review.

Transl Androl Urol. 2023-11-30

[6]
A pilot study of inflatable penile prosthesis placement in transgender neophallus using Tutoplast pericardium graft sock technique.

Transl Androl Urol. 2023-8-31

[7]
The future of penile implants IJIR special edition: 50 year anniversary on penile implants.

Int J Impot Res. 2023-11

[8]
Prostate cancer treatment modality among factors influencing penile prosthesis satisfaction.

Transl Androl Urol. 2023-7-31

[9]
Comparison of satisfaction with penile prosthesis implantation in patients with prostate cancer radiation therapy versus radical prostatectomy.

Transl Androl Urol. 2023-5-31

[10]
Under-recognized factors affecting penile implant satisfaction in patients.

Can Urol Assoc J. 2022-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
UK practice for penile prosthesis surgery: baseline analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) Penile Prosthesis Audit.

BJU Int. 2021-3

[2]
The Absence of a Validated English-Language Survey to Assess Prosthesis Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Using the Sexual Quality of Life After Penile Prosthesis.

J Sex Med. 2020-11

[3]
A Quality Analysis of the Last Decade's Most Heavily Cited Data Relative to Outcomes After Penile Prosthesis Placement.

J Sex Med. 2020-4-6

[4]
Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples' Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation.

J Sex Med. 2019-5-31

[5]
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.

J Biomed Inform. 2019-5-9

[6]
Trends in penile prosthesis implantation and analysis of predictive factors for removal.

World J Urol. 2018-9-24

[7]
Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery.

J Sex Med. 2018-7-13

[8]
Satisfaction rate at 1-year follow-up in patients treated with penile implants: data from the multicentre prospective registry INSIST-ED.

BJU Int. 2018-7-20

[9]
Utilization of penile prosthesis and male incontinence prosthetics in Saudi Arabia.

Urol Ann. 2017

[10]
Critical Analysis of Satisfaction Assessment After Penile Prosthesis Surgery.

Sex Med Rev. 2017-1-28

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索