• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受阴茎植入物治疗的患者在 1 年随访时的满意度:来自多中心前瞻性登记研究 INSIST-ED 的数据。

Satisfaction rate at 1-year follow-up in patients treated with penile implants: data from the multicentre prospective registry INSIST-ED.

机构信息

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2019 Feb;123(2):360-366. doi: 10.1111/bju.14462. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1111/bju.14462
PMID:29956870
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate scores and predictors of patient satisfaction at 1 year after penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) using the validated Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) questionnaire.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Analyses were performed for 142 patients prospectively included in the national multicentre registry Italian Nationwide Systematic Inventarization of Surgical Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction (INSIST-ED), which provided 1-year follow-up data. Postoperative patient satisfaction was assessed using the validated QoLSPP tool. Linear logistic regression analyses assessed predictors of QoLSPP total and single domain scores, including age at surgery, erectile dysfunction aetiology, type of prosthesis, surgical approach, surgeon experience and complications. Locally weighted regression methods were used to explore the relationship between surgeon experience and QoLSPP scores.

RESULTS

Overall, high median functional, relational, social, personal and total QoLSPP scores were reported at 1 year after PPI. Patients implanted with hydraulic devices had higher functional (23 vs 21.5; P = 0.01) and total scores (68 vs 65.5; P = 0.03) than those with a malleable prosthesis. Surgeon experience emerged as the only independent predictor of higher satisfaction scores, depicting a non-linear association with both QoLSPP total and single domain scores (all P < 0.03). Data suggested that the higher the number of procedures per year, the greater the satisfaction scores, reaching a plateau after l5 procedures/year.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports high functional and patient satisfaction scores at 1 year after PPI surgery using a dedicated tool for the first time. Better outcomes should be expected for patients treated by surgeons with greater experience.

摘要

目的

使用经过验证的生活质量和阴茎假体相关性问卷(QoLSPP)调查阴茎假体植入(PPI)后 1 年患者满意度评分和预测因素。

患者和方法

对前瞻性纳入全国多中心登记研究意大利全国性功能障碍手术系统登记(INSIST-ED)的 142 例患者进行分析,该研究提供了 1 年随访数据。使用经过验证的 QoLSPP 工具评估术后患者满意度。线性逻辑回归分析评估了 QoLSPP 总分和单个域评分的预测因素,包括手术时的年龄、勃起功能障碍病因、假体类型、手术入路、手术医生经验和并发症。局部加权回归方法用于探索手术医生经验与 QoLSPP 评分之间的关系。

结果

总体而言,PPI 后 1 年报告了较高的功能、关系、社会、个人和总 QoLSPP 评分。使用液压装置的患者在功能(23 分比 21.5 分;P = 0.01)和总分(68 分比 65.5 分;P = 0.03)方面的评分更高。手术医生经验是更高满意度评分的唯一独立预测因素,与 QoLSPP 总分和单个域评分均呈非线性关联(均 P < 0.03)。数据表明,每年手术次数越多,满意度评分越高,每年 15 次手术后达到平台期。

结论

本研究首次使用专门的工具报告了 PPI 手术后 1 年的高功能和患者满意度评分。经验丰富的手术医生治疗的患者应获得更好的结果。

相似文献

1
Satisfaction rate at 1-year follow-up in patients treated with penile implants: data from the multicentre prospective registry INSIST-ED.接受阴茎植入物治疗的患者在 1 年随访时的满意度:来自多中心前瞻性登记研究 INSIST-ED 的数据。
BJU Int. 2019 Feb;123(2):360-366. doi: 10.1111/bju.14462. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
2
Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.阴茎假体植入术后的长期随访——生存和生活质量结果。
J Sex Med. 2019 Nov;16(11):1827-1833. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
3
The Absence of a Validated English-Language Survey to Assess Prosthesis Satisfaction: A Prospective Cohort Using the Sexual Quality of Life After Penile Prosthesis.缺乏有效的英文语言调查评估假体满意度:使用阴茎假体后生活质量的前瞻性队列研究。
J Sex Med. 2020 Nov;17(11):2307-2310. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
4
Which patient may benefit the most from penile prosthesis implantation?哪种患者可能从阴茎假体植入中获益最大?
Andrology. 2022 Nov;10(8):1567-1574. doi: 10.1111/andr.13294. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
5
A questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: quality of life and sexuality with penile prosthesis (QoLSPP): to what extent does the implant affect the patient's life?阴茎假体植入术后生活质量评估问卷:阴茎假体的生活质量和性生活(QoLSPP):植入物在多大程度上影响了患者的生活?
J Sex Med. 2014 Apr;11(4):1005-1012. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12453. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
6
INSIST-ED: Italian Society of Andrology registry on penile prosthesis surgery. First data analysis.INSIST-ED:意大利男科学会阴茎假体手术登记处。首次数据分析。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016 Jul 4;88(2):122-7. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2016.2.122.
7
Quality of life and sexuality with penile prosthesis: a systematic review and pooled analysis.阴茎假体植入术后的生活质量和性生活:系统评价和汇总分析。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024 Apr;76(2):166-175. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.23.05466-6. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
8
Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples' Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation.比较不同类型和品牌阴茎植入物的长期效果和患者夫妇满意度:883 例勃起功能障碍患者阴茎假体植入术后的经验教训。
J Sex Med. 2019 Jul;16(7):1092-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 May 31.
9
Mid-term outcomes of minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: A single-center study and literature review.耻骨下微创入路植入可膨胀阴茎假体的中期结果:一项单中心研究及文献综述
Andrology. 2024 Mar;12(3):624-632. doi: 10.1111/andr.13497. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
10
Penoscrotal versus minimally invasive infrapubic approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a single-center matched-pair analysis.阴茎阴囊与微创耻骨下入路在可膨胀阴茎假体置入中的应用:单中心配对分析。
World J Urol. 2018 Jul;36(7):1167-1174. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2249-z. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of life outcomes following penile prosthesis insertion in the post-ischaemic priapism setting.阴茎假体植入治疗缺血性阴茎异常勃起后的生活质量结果
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01073-y.
2
Cavernous tissue preservation technique versus conventional technique during penile prosthesis implantation: a prospective comparative study.阴茎假体植入术中海绵体组织保留技术与传统技术的前瞻性对比研究
World J Urol. 2025 Feb 24;43(1):138. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05476-w.
3
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in High-Risk Medical Device Registries: A Scoping Review.
高风险医疗器械注册中的患者报告结局指标:一项范围综述
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Mar 16;6:ojae015. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae015. eCollection 2024.
4
Risk of unfavorable outcomes after penile prosthesis implantation - results from a national registry (INSIST-ED).阴茎假体植入术后不良结局的风险——来自国家登记处(INSIST-ED)的结果
Int J Impot Res. 2024 Dec;36(8):842-847. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00784-4. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
5
Comment on "Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after penile prosthesis placement in men with and without Peyronie's disease".关于“佩罗尼氏病患者与非佩罗尼氏病患者阴茎假体植入术后患者报告结局的比较”的评论
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Sep;35(6):577-578. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00626-9. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
Development and Validation of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI).充气阴茎植入物满意度调查问卷(SSIPI)的编制与验证。
J Sex Med. 2021 Sep;18(9):1641-1651. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.020. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
7
Initial experience of a single center with the use of ZSI 475 penile prosthesis.单中心使用ZSI 475阴茎假体的初步经验。
Asian J Urol. 2021 Apr;8(2):176-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
8
Ten-year experience with penile prosthetic surgery for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: outcomes of a tertiary referral center and predictors of early prosthetic infection. penile 假体手术治疗勃起功能障碍的十年经验:三级转诊中心的结果和早期假体感染的预测因素。
Asian J Androl. 2022 Jan-Feb;24(1):32-39. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_27_21.
9
Preoperative Psychological Evaluation for Patients Referred for Penile Prosthesis Implantation.阴茎假体植入患者的术前心理评估
Sex Med. 2021 Apr;9(2):100311. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100311. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
10
Comparing the Italian and North American prospective registries on penile prosthesis surgery: are there relevant differences in treatment indications and patients' management?比较意大利和北美的阴茎假体手术前瞻性登记研究:在治疗指征和患者管理方面是否存在显著差异?
Int J Impot Res. 2021 Jul;33(5):563-567. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0318-5. Epub 2020 Jun 2.