Department of Orthodontics, Clinic of Dental Medicine, First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of Orthodontics, Clinic of Dental Medicine, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Eur J Orthod. 2022 Mar 30;44(2):178-186. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjab038.
This study aimed to compare the immediate influence of four commonly used retainer wires on tooth mobility following orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.
Eighty patients after orthodontic treatment were assigned to four study groups (n = 20 in each group). Groups were provided with directly bonded fixed retainers-0.0150″ (group A), 0.0175″ (group B), 0.016 × 0.022″ (group C), and 0.0215″ (group D). Tooth mobility was measured using the Periotest device at two times-after removal of fixed appliance (T1) and after bonding of the retainer (T2). Values of tooth mobility, 'Periotest values', were analysed between groups and compared with the physiologic tooth mobility in a control group of untreated patients (n = 65). Kruskal-Wallis H, Mann-Whitney U, Dunn's test, Fisher's exact test, and binary logistic regression tests were used to analyze the data.
Tooth mobility after orthodontic treatment was significantly increased. While canines remained within normal range of tooth mobility, values for incisors increased on average to the first degree of tooth mobility (slight mobility). Logistic regression analysis identified age as a significant predictor for increased tooth mobility (P = 0.032) with odds ratio 1.065 (95% CI 1.005-1.128), with mobility increasing with age. After bonding of the retainer in all four groups, the tooth mobility was reduced to values which were not significantly different form normal physiological values found in the control group (P > 0.05). There were no differences in the amount of change or in tooth mobility values at T2 between the different types of bonded retainers.
Age of subjects in the control group was significantly higher than that in the study groups. An alternation method was used instead of randomization to distribute the four different types of retainers.
All of the retainer wires were able to successfully reduce the increased tooth mobility caused by orthodontic treatment to normal levels. The values of tooth mobility after placement of retainers were within the range of physiologic tooth mobility.
本研究旨在比较四种常用保持器弓丝在固定矫治器正畸治疗后即刻对牙齿动度的影响。
80 名正畸治疗后的患者被分为四组(每组 20 例)。四组分别采用直接粘结的固定保持器-0.0150″(A 组)、0.0175″(B 组)、0.016×0.022″(C 组)和 0.0215″(D 组)。使用 Periotest 设备在两次测量牙齿动度-去除固定矫治器后(T1)和粘结保持器后(T2)。使用 Kruskal-Wallis H、Mann-Whitney U、Dunn 检验、Fisher 确切检验和二项逻辑回归检验分析组间差异,并与未经治疗患者的对照组(n=65)的生理性牙齿动度进行比较。
正畸治疗后牙齿动度明显增加。虽然尖牙仍在正常牙齿动度范围内,但切牙的动度平均值增加到第一度(轻度动度)。逻辑回归分析发现年龄是牙齿动度增加的显著预测因素(P=0.032),优势比为 1.065(95%可信区间 1.005-1.128),牙齿动度随年龄增加而增加。在四个组粘结保持器后,牙齿动度降低至与对照组(P>0.05)正常生理值无显著差异的水平。不同类型粘结保持器之间在 T2 时的变化量或牙齿动度值无差异。
对照组患者的年龄明显高于研究组。为了分配四种不同类型的保持器,使用交替法而不是随机化。
所有保持器弓丝都能成功地将正畸治疗引起的牙齿动度增加降低至正常水平。放置保持器后的牙齿动度值在生理性牙齿动度范围内。