CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, New York, New York, USA.
CUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, New York, New York, USA.
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2021 Aug;35(8):327-334. doi: 10.1089/apc.2021.0033.
Safety differences between tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (TAF) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC)-formulated pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) appear to have little clinical significance for most PrEP users. Furthermore, generic TDF-formulated PrEP is projected to decrease the price of PrEP. Thus, efforts to shift PrEP users to TAF-formulated PrEP should be considered in light of their potential to undermine efforts to scale-up PrEP nationally. Data are taken from a US national cohort study predominantly composed of cisgender gay and bisexual men. In 2019-2020, 5034 participants completed their 24-month assessment, which measured whether participants were switching from TDF (Truvada) to TAF (Descovy) for PrEP, and why. Of those reporting PrEP-use ( = 1009), 277 reported using Descovy for PrEP, and 223 provided a reason for switching to Descovy. A content analysis was used to code participant's reasons for switching. Over half (56%) of participants reported that their doctor recommended switching to Descovy. Without mentioning a provider recommendation, 32% of participants reported that perceived improved safety of Descovy, compared with Truvada, motivated their decision to change their prescription. Other factors cited included the smaller size of the pill and "newness" of Descovy. Further, several participants mentioned negative advertising about Truvada as rationale for switching. Although scientific consensus supports the safety of both TDF/FTC and TAF, our results suggest that current messaging through physicians and other sources have emphasized superior safety of TAF-implying that TDF/FTC may not be safe in the long term. Efforts to shift users onto TAF may undermine public perception of TDF-formulated PrEP.
替诺福韦艾拉酚胺/恩曲他滨(TAF)和替诺福韦二吡呋酯/恩曲他滨(TDF/FTC)配方的暴露前预防(PrEP)之间的安全性差异对于大多数 PrEP 用户来说似乎没有临床意义。此外,预计替诺福韦配方的通用 PrEP 将降低 PrEP 的价格。因此,考虑到将 PrEP 用户转移到 TAF 配方 PrEP 可能会破坏全国范围内扩大 PrEP 规模的努力,应该考虑努力将 PrEP 用户转移到 TAF 配方 PrEP。数据来自美国全国队列研究,主要由顺性别男同性恋和双性恋者组成。在 2019-2020 年,5034 名参与者完成了他们的 24 个月评估,该评估衡量了参与者是否正在从 TDF(Truvada)切换到 TAF(Descovy)用于 PrEP,以及原因是什么。在报告 PrEP 使用情况的参与者中( = 1009),277 名报告使用 Descovy 进行 PrEP,223 名提供了切换到 Descovy 的原因。使用内容分析法对参与者切换的原因进行编码。超过一半(56%)的参与者报告说他们的医生建议切换到 Descovy。在没有提到提供者建议的情况下,32%的参与者报告说,与 Truvada 相比,Descovy 感知到的安全性提高促使他们决定改变处方。引用的其他因素包括药丸的尺寸较小和 Descovy 的“新颖性”。此外,一些参与者提到了针对 Truvada 的负面广告作为切换的理由。尽管科学界普遍支持 TDF/FTC 和 TAF 的安全性,但我们的研究结果表明,目前通过医生和其他来源传递的信息强调了 TAF 的更高安全性,这表明 TDF/FTC 可能在长期内不安全。努力将用户转移到 TAF 可能会破坏公众对 TDF 配方 PrEP 的看法。