• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不可降解覆膜与可降解覆膜金属支架治疗不可切除恶性远端胆道梗阻的随机多中心试验

Uncovered versus covered metallic stents for the management of unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a randomized multicenter trial.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Nephrology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Tokai University Hospital, Iseahara, Japan.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct;56(10):1229-1235. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1938207. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

DOI:10.1080/00365521.2021.1938207
PMID:34375164
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The treatment result of the uncovered metallic stent (uncovered MS) and covered metallic stent (covered MS) for unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction is controversial. This time, we conducted this study to compare the efficacies and complication rates of uncovered MS and covered MS in unresectable malignant distal biliary obstructions at a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2014 to September 2018, patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction were randomly assigned to 2 groups: the uncovered MS group and the covered MS group.

RESULTS

92 treatment results patients were discussed. 48 patients were assigned to the uncovered MS group and 44 cases were assigned to the covered MS group. Both groups showed a drainage effect. No significant difference was found in the drainage effect between the 2 groups. The number of stent occlusion was significantly greater ( = .0467) in uncovered MS (43.8%) comparing with those in covered MS (22.7%). As the cause of stent occlusion, tumor ingrowth was significantly greater ( < .001) in the uncovered MS group (35.4%) than in the covered MS group (2.3%). The median stent patency period was significantly longer ( = .0112) in the covered MS group (455 days) than that of the uncovered MS group (301 days). A significant difference in the median survival period was not found between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Covered MS showed the possibility of extending the stent patency period by suppressing tumor ingrowth more than uncovered MS does. The UMIN Clinical Trial Registry number is UMIN000015093.

摘要

目的

对于无法切除的恶性远端胆道梗阻,uncovered MS(无覆膜金属支架)和 covered MS(覆膜金属支架)的治疗效果存在争议。本研究旨在通过前瞻性随机多中心试验,比较无法切除的恶性远端胆道梗阻患者使用 uncovered MS 和 covered MS 的疗效和并发症发生率。

材料和方法

自 2014 年 4 月至 2018 年 9 月,将无法切除的恶性远端胆道梗阻患者随机分为 2 组:uncovered MS 组和 covered MS 组。

结果

共讨论了 92 例治疗结果患者。48 例患者被分配到 uncovered MS 组,44 例患者被分配到 covered MS 组。两组均显示出引流效果。两组间引流效果无显著差异。uncovered MS 组支架闭塞的数量明显更多(=0.0467)(43.8%),而 covered MS 组支架闭塞的数量明显较少(22.7%)。作为支架闭塞的原因,uncovered MS 组(35.4%)的肿瘤生长明显多于 covered MS 组(2.3%)。covered MS 组的中位支架通畅期明显较长(=0.0112)(455 天),而 uncovered MS 组的中位支架通畅期明显较短(301 天)。两组的中位生存时间无显著差异。

结论

覆膜 MS 可通过抑制肿瘤生长,比 uncovered MS 更有可能延长支架通畅期。UMIN 临床试验注册编号为 UMIN000015093。

相似文献

1
Uncovered versus covered metallic stents for the management of unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a randomized multicenter trial.不可降解覆膜与可降解覆膜金属支架治疗不可切除恶性远端胆道梗阻的随机多中心试验
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct;56(10):1229-1235. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1938207. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
2
Covered self-expandable metal stents with an anti-migration system improve patency duration without increased complications compared with uncovered stents for distal biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic carcinoma: a randomized multicenter trial.带防迁移系统的覆膜自膨式金属支架与未覆膜支架相比,可改善因胰腺癌导致的远端胆道梗阻的通畅时间,而不增加并发症:一项随机多中心试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;108(11):1713-22. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.305. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
3
Covered versus uncovered self-expandable nitinol stents in the palliative treatment of malignant distal biliary obstruction: results from a randomized, multicenter study.覆膜与非覆膜自膨式镍钛合金支架在恶性远端胆道梗阻姑息治疗中的应用:一项随机、多中心研究的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Nov;72(5):915-23. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.07.036.
4
Comparison of outcomes among secondary covered metallic, uncovered metallic, and plastic biliary stents in treating occluded primary metallic stents in malignant distal biliary obstruction.比较治疗恶性远端胆道梗阻中闭塞的原发性金属支架时,第二代覆盖型金属、无覆盖型金属和塑料胆道支架的治疗效果。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):475-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1196-6. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
5
Partially Covered Metal Stents May Not Prolong Stent Patency Compared to Uncovered Stents in Unresectable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction.在不可切除的恶性远端胆管梗阻中,与裸支架相比,部分覆膜金属支架可能无法延长支架通畅时间。
Gut Liver. 2017 May 15;11(3):440-446. doi: 10.5009/gnl16245.
6
Partially covered metal stents have longer patency than uncovered and fully covered metal stents in the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction: a retrospective study.一项回顾性研究表明:在远端恶性胆管梗阻的治疗中,部分覆膜金属支架的通畅时间比未覆膜及全覆膜金属支架更长。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct 11;17(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0662-1.
7
Reintervention for occluded metal stent in malignant bile duct obstruction: A prospective randomized trial comparing covered and uncovered metal stent.恶性胆管梗阻中闭塞金属支架的再次干预:一项比较覆膜和非覆膜金属支架的前瞻性随机试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Nov;31(11):1901-1907. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13392.
8
Comparison of covered self-expandable metallic stents with 12-mm and 10-mm diameters for unresectable malignant distal biliary obstructions: a prospective randomized trial.直径12毫米和10毫米的覆膜自膨式金属支架用于不可切除的恶性远端胆管梗阻的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 May;99(5):732-738. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.11.033. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
9
No evidence of improved efficacy of covered stents over uncovered stents in percutaneous palliation of malignant hilar biliary obstruction: results of a prospective randomized trial.经皮姑息性治疗恶性肝门胆管梗阻时,覆膜支架与未覆膜支架相比疗效并无改善:一项前瞻性随机试验结果。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jan;30(1):175-185. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06374-7. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
A prospective randomised study of "covered" versus "uncovered" diamond stents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction.一项关于“覆膜”与“非覆膜”菱形支架治疗远端恶性胆管梗阻的前瞻性随机研究。
Gut. 2004 May;53(5):729-34. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.018945.

引用本文的文献

1
Fully-covered metal stent removal failure in case of non-malignant biliary strictures: Risk factors and resolution technique.非恶性胆管狭窄病例中完全覆盖金属支架取出失败:危险因素及解决技术
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Sep 5;13:a26695801. doi: 10.1055/a-2669-5801. eCollection 2025.
2
The anti-migration effect of partially covered self-expandable metal stents for unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: A multicenter comparative study.部分覆盖自膨式金属支架治疗不可切除性恶性远端胆管梗阻的抗迁移作用:一项多中心比较研究。
DEN Open. 2025 Mar 20;5(1):e70100. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70100. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Feasibility of Double-Deployment Small-Diameter Covered Metallic Stent for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction (with Video).
双部署小直径覆膜金属支架用于恶性远端胆管梗阻的可行性(附视频)
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 7;14(19):2233. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192233.
4
Endoscopic biliary drainage for distal bile duct obstruction due to pancreatic cancer.内镜下胆管引流术治疗胰腺癌所致远端胆管梗阻
Clin Endosc. 2025 Jan;58(1):40-52. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.294. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
5
Endeavors to prevent stent malfunction: new insights into the risk factors for recurrent biliary obstruction.预防支架功能障碍的努力:对复发性胆管梗阻危险因素的新见解。
Clin Endosc. 2024 Jan;57(1):56-57. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.274. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
6
Efficacy and complications of inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction treatment by metallic stents: fully covered or uncovered?金属支架治疗不可切除性恶性远端胆管梗阻的疗效及并发症:全覆膜与裸支架?
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2023 Aug 22;11:goad048. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goad048. eCollection 2023.
7
A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Biliary Stent Types' Outcome and Complications in Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstructions.贝叶斯网络荟萃分析比较不可切除恶性胆道梗阻中胆管支架类型的结局和并发症。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):791-800. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.791.
8
Endoscopic palliation of malignant biliary obstruction.恶性胆管梗阻的内镜下姑息治疗
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Oct 16;14(10):581-596. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i10.581.