• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯网络荟萃分析比较不可切除恶性胆道梗阻中胆管支架类型的结局和并发症。

A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Biliary Stent Types' Outcome and Complications in Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstructions.

机构信息

Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sanglah General Hospital, Udayana University, Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):791-800. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.791.

DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.791
PMID:36974530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10334068/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) in comparing biliary stents types' outcomes and complications in unresectable MBO.

METHODS

The study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA and NMA extension . Comprehensive searches of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Scopus were done analyzing randomized controlled trials that included subjects with unresectable malignant biliary obstructions that underwent biliary stents placement from any approaches. The types of stents that included were full-covered metal (FMS), partially-covered metal (PMS), uncovered metal (UMS), plastic (PLS), Iodine-125 seeds strands (IRS), antireflux (ARS), and paclitaxel-coated (PXS) stents. The outcome parameters were clinical success, median patency duration, medial survival, and early 30-day mortality. The complications included were stent occlusion, stent migration, cholangitis, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, hemorrhage, and hemobilia. The NMA will be done based on Bayesian method, Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm, using BUGSnet package in R studio. Transivity was controlled by methods and consistency of the NMA will be fitted by deviance information criterion. Data analysis in NMA were presented in Sucra plot, league table, and forest plot.

RESULT

Thirty-six RCTs were included with 3502 subjects. ARS had the best clinical success and longest median patency. However, it was associated with higher rate of  complications. IRS had a good clinical success (RR 1.63; 95%CI 0.67-6.25), long median patency (MD 21.14; 95%CI -106.18 to 145.91), and high significant survival rate (MD 69.89; 95%CI 22 to 117.57) compared to others stents. It was associated unsignificant complications of cholecystitis, hemobilia, and hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Iodine-125 seeds strands had the promising good outcome and tolerated complications among others and should be considered as a standard stent to be used in unresectable malignant biliary obstructions.

摘要

目的

比较不可切除性恶性胆道梗阻患者使用不同胆道支架的结局和并发症,进行网状 Meta 分析(NMA)。

方法

本研究按照 PRISMA 和 NMA 扩展声明进行。系统检索 Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE 和 Scopus,纳入所有采用任何入路经胆道支架置入术治疗不可切除性恶性胆道梗阻的随机对照试验。支架类型包括全覆膜金属支架(FMS)、部分覆膜金属支架(PMS)、无覆膜金属支架(UMS)、塑料支架(PLS)、碘 125 放射性粒子支架(IRS)、抗反流支架(ARS)和紫杉醇涂层支架(PXS)。结局参数包括临床成功率、中位通畅时间、中位生存时间和早期 30 天死亡率。并发症包括支架堵塞、支架移位、胆管炎、胆囊炎、胰腺炎、出血和胆血征。NMA 将基于贝叶斯方法,马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗算法,使用 R 工作室中的 BUGSnet 包进行。采用一致性检验和处理传递性检验,Deviance Information Criterion(DIC)拟合一致性。网状 Meta 分析的数据以 Sucra 图、联赛表和森林图呈现。

结果

纳入 36 项 RCT,共 3502 例患者。ARS 具有最佳的临床成功率和最长的中位通畅时间,但与较高的并发症发生率相关。IRS 具有良好的临床成功率(RR 1.63;95%CI 0.67-6.25)、较长的中位通畅时间(MD 21.14;95%CI -106.18 至 145.91)和高的生存率(MD 69.89;95%CI 22 至 117.57),与其他支架相比,胆囊炎、胆血征和出血等并发症发生率无显著差异。

结论

碘 125 放射性粒子支架在不可切除性恶性胆道梗阻患者中具有较好的疗效和可耐受的并发症,可作为标准支架使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/0b3666ac0af7/APJCP-24-791-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/fd3b441831e3/APJCP-24-791-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/b31d49811212/APJCP-24-791-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/cebc90c5cf6d/APJCP-24-791-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/6c2fae92df4d/APJCP-24-791-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/928c334f93ef/APJCP-24-791-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/0533cc80d445/APJCP-24-791-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/31acac3bd5c3/APJCP-24-791-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/a18d54e6d0ca/APJCP-24-791-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/0978904e71f2/APJCP-24-791-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/e010dad8c370/APJCP-24-791-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/0ae67a646fec/APJCP-24-791-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/a1f1627503d3/APJCP-24-791-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/1d5b7de23051/APJCP-24-791-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/0b3666ac0af7/APJCP-24-791-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/fd3b441831e3/APJCP-24-791-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/b31d49811212/APJCP-24-791-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/cebc90c5cf6d/APJCP-24-791-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/6c2fae92df4d/APJCP-24-791-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/928c334f93ef/APJCP-24-791-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/0533cc80d445/APJCP-24-791-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/31acac3bd5c3/APJCP-24-791-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/a18d54e6d0ca/APJCP-24-791-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/0978904e71f2/APJCP-24-791-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/e010dad8c370/APJCP-24-791-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/0ae67a646fec/APJCP-24-791-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/a1f1627503d3/APJCP-24-791-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/1d5b7de23051/APJCP-24-791-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ca4/10334068/0b3666ac0af7/APJCP-24-791-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Biliary Stent Types' Outcome and Complications in Unresectable Malignant Biliary Obstructions.贝叶斯网络荟萃分析比较不可切除恶性胆道梗阻中胆管支架类型的结局和并发症。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):791-800. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.791.
2
No benefit of covered vs uncovered self-expandable metal stents in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis.覆膜与非覆膜自膨式金属支架治疗恶性远端胆道梗阻患者的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jan;11(1):27-37.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.019. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
3
Covered self-expandable metal stents with an anti-migration system improve patency duration without increased complications compared with uncovered stents for distal biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic carcinoma: a randomized multicenter trial.带防迁移系统的覆膜自膨式金属支架与未覆膜支架相比,可改善因胰腺癌导致的远端胆道梗阻的通畅时间,而不增加并发症:一项随机多中心试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;108(11):1713-22. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.305. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
4
Irradiation stent insertion for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不可手术恶性胆道梗阻患者内照射支架置入术的疗效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 May;46(5):2173-2181. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02851-6. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
5
Partially covered self-expanding metal stent for unresectable malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction: results of a large prospective series.部分覆膜自膨式金属支架治疗不可切除的恶性肝外胆道梗阻:一项大型前瞻性系列研究结果。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):222-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1858-z. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
6
Meta-analysis on clinical outcomes of suprapapillary versus transpapillary stent insertion in malignant biliary obstruction.恶性胆管梗阻中乳头上方与经乳头支架置入临床结局的Meta分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8178-8195. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10464-5. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
Percutaneous unilateral biliary metallic stent placement in patients with malignant obstruction of the biliary hila and contralateral portal vein steno-occlusion.经皮单侧胆道金属支架置入术治疗肝门部恶性梗阻合并对侧门静脉狭窄或闭塞患者
Korean J Radiol. 2015 May-Jun;16(3):586-92. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.3.586. Epub 2015 May 13.
8
Covered versus uncovered double bare self-expandable metal stent for palliation of unresectable extrahepatic malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized controlled multicenter trial.覆膜与非覆膜双猪尾自膨式金属支架治疗不可切除的肝外恶性胆道梗阻:一项随机对照多中心试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Jan;97(1):132-142.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.08.041. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
9
Irradiation stents vs. conventional metal stents for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: A multicenter trial.不可切除恶性胆道梗阻的放疗支架与传统金属支架的比较:一项多中心试验。
J Hepatol. 2018 May;68(5):970-977. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.12.028. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
10
Comparative efficacy and safety of local palliative therapeutics for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.不可切除恶性胆道梗阻局部姑息性治疗的疗效和安全性比较:贝叶斯网状Meta 分析。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;16(6):555-567. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2085090. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Emerging trends in biliary stents: a materials and manufacturing perspective.胆道支架的新趋势:材料与制造视角
Biomater Sci. 2022 Jul 12;10(14):3716-3729. doi: 10.1039/d2bm00234e.
2
Radioactive Iodine-125 in Tumor Therapy: Advances and Future Directions.肿瘤治疗中的放射性碘-125:进展与未来方向
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 30;11:717180. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.717180. eCollection 2021.
3
Uncovered versus covered metallic stents for the management of unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a randomized multicenter trial.
不可降解覆膜与可降解覆膜金属支架治疗不可切除恶性远端胆道梗阻的随机多中心试验
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct;56(10):1229-1235. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1938207. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
4
Biliary stent combined with iodine-125 seed strand implantation in malignant obstructive jaundice.胆道支架联合碘-125粒子条植入治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Feb 6;9(4):801-811. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.801.
5
Comparative Efficacy of Various Stents for Palliation in Patients with Malignant Extrahepatic Biliary Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.各种支架用于恶性肝外胆管梗阻患者姑息治疗的比较疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
J Pers Med. 2021 Jan 30;11(2):86. doi: 10.3390/jpm11020086.
6
Covered self-expandable metal stents versus plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in patient receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Prospective randomized study.覆膜自膨式金属支架与塑料支架用于新辅助化疗的局部进展期胰腺癌患者术前胆道引流的前瞻性随机研究。
Dig Endosc. 2021 Nov;33(7):1170-1178. doi: 10.1111/den.13926. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
7
A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial for preoperative biliary drainage with uncovered metal versus plastic stents for resectable periampullary cancer.一项针对可切除胰周交界部癌患者术前胆道引流的多中心前瞻性随机对照临床试验:使用 uncovered metal 与 plastic 支架的对比。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Oct;27(10):690-699. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.811. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
8
Stent performance in palliative transhepatic treatment of malignant biliary obstruction: a randomized study comparing covered versus uncovered stents.覆膜支架与非覆膜支架在恶性胆管梗阻姑息性经肝治疗中的支架性能:一项随机对照研究
Acta Radiol. 2020 Dec;61(12):1591-1599. doi: 10.1177/0284185120911187. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
9
Early Diagnosis And Management Of Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Review On Current Recommendations And Guidelines.恶性远端胆管梗阻的早期诊断与管理:当前建议和指南综述
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 5;12:415-432. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S195714. eCollection 2019.
10
No evidence of improved efficacy of covered stents over uncovered stents in percutaneous palliation of malignant hilar biliary obstruction: results of a prospective randomized trial.经皮姑息性治疗恶性肝门胆管梗阻时,覆膜支架与未覆膜支架相比疗效并无改善:一项前瞻性随机试验结果。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jan;30(1):175-185. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06374-7. Epub 2019 Aug 5.