Department of Conservation and Science, Lincoln Park Zoo, 2001 N Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.
EcoHealth Alliance, 520 Eighth Avenue, Suite 1200, New York, NY 10018, USA.
Biol Lett. 2021 Aug;17(8):20210311. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0311. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
Anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs) deployed to control rodent pest populations can increase the risk of pathogen infection for some wildlife. However, it is unknown whether ARs also increase infection risk for target rodents, which are common hosts for zoonotic (animal-to-human transmitted) pathogens. In this study, we tested whether rats exposed to ARs were more likely to be infected with zoonotic pathogens, specifically spp. or , after controlling for known predictors of infection (i.e. sex, age, body condition). We collected biological samples from 99 rats trapped in Chicago alleys and tested these for infection, shedding and AR exposure. We found that rats that had been exposed to ARs and survived until the time of trapping, as well as older rats, were significantly more likely to be infected with spp. than other rats. We found no significant association between shedding and any predictors. Our results show that human actions to manage rats can affect rat disease ecology and public health risks in unintended ways, and more broadly, contribute to a growing awareness of bidirectional relationships between humans and natural systems in cities.
抗凝血灭鼠剂(ARs)被用于控制鼠类害虫种群,但可能会增加某些野生动物感染病原体的风险。然而,目前尚不清楚 ARs 是否也会增加目标啮齿动物(常见的人畜共患病病原体宿主)的感染风险。在这项研究中,我们测试了接触 ARs 的大鼠在控制感染的已知预测因素(即性别、年龄、身体状况)后,是否更有可能感染人畜共患病原体,特别是 spp. 或 。我们从芝加哥巷子里捕获的 99 只大鼠身上采集了生物样本,并对这些样本进行了 感染、 脱落和 AR 暴露的检测。我们发现,接触过 ARs 并存活到被捕捞时间的大鼠,以及年龄较大的大鼠,与其他大鼠相比,感染 spp. 的可能性显著更高。我们没有发现 脱落与任何预测因素之间存在显著关联。我们的研究结果表明,人类管理大鼠的行动可能会以意想不到的方式影响大鼠的疾病生态和公共卫生风险,更广泛地说,这有助于人们日益认识到城市中人类与自然系统之间的双向关系。