Fu Su, Zhang Chunlin, Yan Xu, Li Dongzhe, Wang Yongkui, Dong Chao, Cao Zhengming, Ning Yongming, Shao Chenglong, Yang Tengyue
Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Apr 1;47(7):E296-E303. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004197.
Retrospective study on 185 patients with 490 cervical disc herniation (CDH).
The aim of this study was to compare the changes in volumes of CDH in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) surgically treated by expansive open-door laminoplasty (EOLP) or cervical microendoscopic laminoplasty (CMEL).
Spontaneous resorption of CDH was shown in patients with DCM after conservation treatment, but very few in surgically treated patients. Our previous study identified the clinical efficiency of CMEL to treat DCM but how CDH sized postoperatively, as well as comparing to EOLP, was unknown.
Consecutive patients with DCM from December 2015 to December 2019, who underwent MRI evaluation, receiving CMEL or EOLP, and repeat MRI in follow-up were included. The volume of CDH were monitored using the picture archiving and communication system, further calculating the incidence of CDH with volume regression and the percentage changes of CDH volume. The correlations of possible determines with CDH volume changes were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation coefficient.
A total of 89 patients (215 CDHs, EOLP-group) and 96 patients (275 CDHs, CMEL-group) was surveyed, respectively. Resultantly, volume of CDH was decreased postoperatively in both EOLP and CMEL cases. But this CDH volume regression was more profound in CMEL groups (incidence of 81.2% from 223/275, median volume change ratio of -26.7%, occurring from 1 month after CMEL), statistically different from EOLP group (50.2% from 108/215, median volume change ratio of -5.4%, none-appearance within 1 month). Patients information as sex, age, and follow-up time, not CDH significant, was significantly correlated with CDH volume changes.
Patients who underwent CMEL developed a postoperative reduction of CDH volume, with more popularity, greater degree and earlier-staged than EOLP-patients. Young females with longer follow-up time were more likely occur.Level of Evidence: 4.
对185例患者的490处颈椎间盘突出症(CDH)进行回顾性研究。
本研究旨在比较采用扩大开门椎板成形术(EOLP)或颈椎显微内镜下椎板成形术(CMEL)手术治疗的退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)患者中CDH体积的变化。
保守治疗后的DCM患者中显示出CDH的自发吸收,但手术治疗的患者中很少见。我们之前的研究确定了CMEL治疗DCM的临床疗效,但术后CDH的大小如何,以及与EOLP相比情况如何尚不清楚。
纳入2015年12月至2019年12月连续的DCM患者,这些患者接受了MRI评估,接受了CMEL或EOLP治疗,并在随访中进行了重复MRI检查。使用图像存档和通信系统监测CDH的体积,进一步计算CDH体积缩小的发生率以及CDH体积的百分比变化。通过Spearman等级相关系数分析可能的决定因素与CDH体积变化的相关性。
分别对89例患者(215处CDH,EOLP组)和96例患者(275处CDH,CMEL组)进行了调查。结果显示,EOLP和CMEL病例术后CDH体积均减小。但CMEL组的CDH体积缩小更为显著(223/275,发生率为81.2%,中位体积变化率为-26.7%,在CMEL术后1个月出现),与EOLP组(108/215,发生率为50.2%,中位体积变化率为-5.4%,1个月内未出现)在统计学上有差异。患者的性别、年龄和随访时间等信息与CDH体积变化无显著相关性,但具有显著相关性。
接受CMEL治疗的患者术后CDH体积减小,比接受EOLP治疗的患者更普遍、程度更大且更早出现。随访时间较长的年轻女性更易出现。证据等级:4级。