Coelho-Júnior Hélio José, Uchida Marco Carlos
Laboratory of Applied Kinesiology, School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 26;8:702436. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.702436. eCollection 2021.
The current study investigated the effects of low-speed resistance training (LSRT) and high-speed resistance training (HSRT) on frailty status, physical performance, cognitive function and blood pressure in pre-frail and frail older people. Sixty older adults, 32 prefrail and 28 frail, were randomly allocated into LSRT, HSRT, and control group (CG). Before and after intervention periods frailty status, blood pressure, heart rate, and a set of physical performance capabilities and cognitive domains were assessed. Exercise interventions occurred over 16 weeks and included four resistance exercises with 4-8 sets of 4-10 repetitions at moderate intensity. The prevalence of frailty criteria in prefrail and frail older adults were reduced after both LSRT and HSRT. In prefrail, LSRT significantly improved lower-limb muscle strength, while mobility was only improved after HSRT. Muscle power and dual-task performance were significantly increased in both LSRT and HSRT. In frail, LSRT and HSRT similarly improved lower-limb muscle strength and power. However, exclusive improvements in dual-task were observed after LSRT. Memory was significantly increased in prefrail and frail, regardless of the type of resistance training. No significant changes were observed in blood pressure and heart rate. Findings of the present study indicated that both LSRT and HSRT reversed frailty status and improved physical performance in prefrail and frail older adults. Notably, different patterns of improvement were observed among RT protocols. Regarding frailty status, LSRT seemed to be more effective in reverse prefrailty and frailty when compared to HSRT. Greater improvements in muscle strength and power were also observed after LSRT, while HSRT produced superior increases in mobility and dual-task performance. One-leg stand performance was significantly reduced in LSRT, but not HSRT and CG, after 16 weeks. In contrast, RT programs similarly improved verbal memory in prefrail. Finally, no changes in blood pressure and heart rate were observed, regardless of the type of RT. The protocol was approved by the University of Campinas Human Research Ethics Committee (Protocol No. 20021919.7.0000.5404) and retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System: NCT04868071.
本研究调查了低速抗阻训练(LSRT)和高速抗阻训练(HSRT)对衰弱前期和衰弱老年人的衰弱状态、身体机能、认知功能及血压的影响。60名老年人,32名衰弱前期和28名衰弱者,被随机分为LSRT组、HSRT组和对照组(CG)。在干预期前后,对衰弱状态、血压、心率以及一系列身体机能和认知领域进行了评估。运动干预为期16周,包括四项抗阻训练,以中等强度进行4 - 8组,每组4 - 10次重复。LSRT和HSRT后,衰弱前期和衰弱老年人的衰弱标准患病率均有所降低。在衰弱前期,LSRT显著提高了下肢肌肉力量,而HSRT后仅改善了身体活动能力。LSRT和HSRT均显著提高了肌肉力量和双任务表现。在衰弱者中,LSRT和HSRT同样改善了下肢肌肉力量和力量。然而,仅在LSRT后观察到双任务表现的改善。无论抗阻训练类型如何,衰弱前期和衰弱者的记忆力均显著提高。血压和心率未观察到显著变化。本研究结果表明,LSRT和HSRT均可逆转衰弱前期和衰弱老年人的衰弱状态并改善身体机能。值得注意的是,在抗阻训练方案中观察到了不同的改善模式。关于衰弱状态,与HSRT相比,LSRT在逆转衰弱前期和衰弱方面似乎更有效。LSRT后肌肉力量和力量也有更大改善,而HSRT在身体活动能力和双任务表现方面有更显著提高。16周后,LSRT组的单腿站立表现显著降低,但HSRT组和CG组未出现此情况。相比之下,抗阻训练方案同样改善了衰弱前期者的言语记忆。最后,无论抗阻训练类型如何,血压和心率均未观察到变化。该方案已获得坎皮纳斯大学人类研究伦理委员会批准(方案编号20021919.7.0000.5404),并在ClinicalTrials.gov方案注册和结果系统中进行了回顾性注册:NCT04868071。