Department of Public Health, College of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA, 95343, USA.
Pacific Southwest Region, USDA Forest Service, Clovis, CA, USA.
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Nov;32(11):1279-1288. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01478-2. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
This study investigated the association between dietary patterns, total mortality, and cancer mortality in the United States.
We identified the four major dietary patterns at baseline from 13,466 participants of the NHANES III cohort using principal component analysis (PCA). Dietary patterns were categorized into 'prudent' (fruits and vegetables), 'western' (red meat, sweets, pastries, oils), 'traditional' (red meat, legumes, potatoes, bread), and 'fish and alcohol'. We estimated hazard ratios for total mortality, and cancer mortality using Cox regression models.
A total of 4,963 deaths were documented after a mean follow-up of 19.59 years. Higher adherence to the 'prudent' pattern was associated with the lowest risk of total mortality (5th vs. 1st quintile HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98), with evidence that all-cause mortality decreased as consumption of the pattern increased. No evidence was found that the 'prudent' pattern reduced cancer mortality. The 'western' and the 'traditional' patterns were associated with up to 22% and 16% increased risk for total mortality (5th vs. 1st quintile HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.11-1.34; and 5th vs. 1st quintile HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06-1.27, respectively), and up to 33% and 15% increased risk for cancer mortality (5th vs. 1st quintile HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.10-1.62; and 5th vs. 1st quintile HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.24, respectively). The associations between adherence to the 'fish and alcohol' pattern and total mortality, and cancer mortality were not statistically significant.
Higher adherence to the 'prudent' diet decreased the risk of all-cause mortality but did not affect cancer mortality. Greater adherence to the 'western' and 'traditional' diet increased the risk of total mortality and mortality due to cancer.
本研究旨在探讨美国饮食模式与总死亡率和癌症死亡率之间的关系。
我们使用主成分分析(PCA)从 NHANES III 队列的 13466 名参与者中确定了基线时的四种主要饮食模式。饮食模式分为“谨慎”(水果和蔬菜)、“西方”(红色肉类、甜食、糕点、油类)、“传统”(红色肉类、豆类、土豆、面包)和“鱼类和酒精”。我们使用 Cox 回归模型估计总死亡率和癌症死亡率的危险比。
在平均随访 19.59 年后,共记录了 4963 例死亡。与最低五分位数相比,“谨慎”饮食模式的人全因死亡率最低(第 5 分位与第 1 分位 HR 0.90,95%CI 0.82-0.98),且随着该模式摄入量的增加,全因死亡率呈下降趋势。没有证据表明“谨慎”饮食模式降低了癌症死亡率。“西方”和“传统”饮食模式与总死亡率增加 22%和 16%相关(第 5 分位与第 1 分位 HR 1.22,95%CI 1.11-1.34;和第 5 分位与第 1 分位 HR 1.16,95%CI 1.06-1.27),与癌症死亡率增加 33%和 15%相关(第 5 分位与第 1 分位 HR 1.33,95%CI 1.10-1.62;和第 5 分位与第 1 分位 HR 1.15,95%CI 1.06-1.24)。与“鱼类和酒精”饮食模式与总死亡率和癌症死亡率之间的关联无统计学意义。
更高的“谨慎”饮食依从性降低了全因死亡率的风险,但没有影响癌症死亡率。更高的“西方”和“传统”饮食依从性增加了全因死亡率和癌症死亡率的风险。