McDonagh Marian S, Dana Tracy, Kopelovich Sarah L, Monroe-DeVita Maria, Blazina Ian, Bougatsos Christina, Grusing Sara, Selph Shelley S
Pacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (McDonagh, Dana, Blazina, Bougatsos, Grusing, Selph); University of Washington, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle (Kopelovich, Monroe-DeVita).
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Mar 1;73(3):299-312. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000649. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
The authors of this systematic review (SR) sought to provide evidence for effects of commonly used psychosocial interventions on several outcomes among adults with schizophrenia.
MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO databases were searched through July 2020. Eligible studies were SRs and trials of at least 12 weeks duration and with ≥50 participants that compared psychosocial interventions with treatment as usual among adults with schizophrenia. Study design, year, setting, country, sample size, eligibility criteria, population, clinical and intervention characteristics, results, and funding source were extracted, along with quality criteria. The evidence was evaluated on quality and strength of evidence stratified by intervention area and outcome, according to the Evidence-Based Practice Centers Methods Guide of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Nine SRs and 30 trials (N=23,921 patients) in 11 intervention areas were included. Trials were mostly of fair quality and had low-to-moderate strength of evidence. Compared with treatment as usual, most psychosocial interventions were more effective in improving intervention-targeted outcomes, including core illness symptoms. Compared with treatment as usual, assertive community treatment, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), family interventions, psychoeducation, social skills training, supported employment, and early interventions for first-episode psychosis (FEP) improved various functional outcomes. CBT and early interventions for FEP improved quality of life. Family interventions, psychoeducation, illness self-management, and early interventions for FEP reduced relapse.
Compared with treatment as usual, most psychosocial interventions improved functional outcomes, quality of life, and core illness symptoms, and several reduced relapse frequency among adults with schizophrenia.
本系统评价(SR)的作者旨在为常用心理社会干预措施对成人精神分裂症患者多种结局的影响提供证据。
检索了截至2020年7月的MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和PsycINFO数据库。纳入的合格研究为系统评价以及持续时间至少12周且参与者≥50例的试验,这些研究在成人精神分裂症患者中将心理社会干预措施与常规治疗进行了比较。提取了研究设计、年份、地点、国家、样本量、纳入标准、人群、临床和干预特征、结果以及资金来源,同时提取了质量标准。根据医疗保健研究与质量局循证实践中心方法指南,按干预领域和结局对证据的质量和强度进行了评估。
纳入了11个干预领域的9项系统评价和30项试验(N = 23,921例患者)。试验质量大多为中等,证据强度低至中等。与常规治疗相比,大多数心理社会干预措施在改善干预目标结局(包括核心疾病症状)方面更有效。与常规治疗相比,积极社区治疗、认知行为疗法(CBT)、家庭干预、心理教育、社交技能训练、支持性就业以及首发精神病(FEP)的早期干预改善了各种功能结局。CBT和FEP的早期干预改善了生活质量。家庭干预、心理教育、疾病自我管理以及FEP的早期干预降低了复发率。
与常规治疗相比,大多数心理社会干预措施改善了成人精神分裂症患者的功能结局、生活质量和核心疾病症状,有几种措施还降低了复发频率。