• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症复发预防的心理社会和心理干预:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Psychosocial and psychological interventions for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;8(11):969-980. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00243-1. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00243-1
PMID:34653393
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many psychosocial and psychological interventions are used in patients with schizophrenia, but their comparative efficacy in the prevention of relapse is not known. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of psychosocial and psychological interventions for relapse prevention in schizophrenia.

METHODS

To conduct this systematic review and network meta-analysis we searched for published and unpublished randomised controlled trials that investigated psychosocial or psychological interventions aimed at preventing relapse in patients with schizophrenia. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, BIOSIS, Cochrane Library, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to Jan 20, 2020, and searched PubMed up to April 14, 2020. We included open and masked studies done in adults with schizophrenia or related disorders. We excluded studies in which all patients were acutely ill, had a concomitant medical or psychiatric disorder, or were prodromal or "at risk of psychosis". Study selection and data extraction were done by two reviewers independently based on published and unpublished reports, and by contacting study authors. Data were extracted about efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of the interventions; potential effect moderators; and study quality and characteristics. The primary outcome was relapse measured with operationalised criteria or psychiatric hospital admissions. We did random-effects network meta-analysis to calculate odds ratios (ORs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42019147884.

FINDINGS

We identified 27 765 studies through the database search and 330 through references of previous reviews and studies. We screened 28 000 records after duplicates were removed. 24 406 records were excluded by title and abstract screening and 3594 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. 3350 articles were then excluded for a variety of reasons, and 244 full-text articles corresponding to 85 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Of these, 72 studies with 10 364 participants (3939 females and 5716 males with sex indicated) were included in the network meta-analysis. The randomised controlled trials included compared 20 psychological interventions given mainly as add-on to antipsychotics. Ethnicity data were not available. Family interventions (OR 0·35, 95% CI 0·24-0·52), relapse prevention programmes (OR 0·33, 0·14-0·79), cognitive behavioural therapy (OR 0·45, 0·27-0·75), family psychoeducation (OR 0·56, 0·39-0·82), integrated interventions (OR 0·62, 0·44-0·87), and patient psychoeducation (OR 0·63, 0·42-0·94) reduced relapse more than treatment as usual at 1 year. The confidence in the estimates ranged from moderate to very low. We found no indication of publication bias.

INTERPRETATION

We found robust benefits in reducing the risk of relapse for family interventions, family psychoeducation, and cognitive behavioral therapy. These treatments should be the first psychosocial interventions to be considered in the long-term treatment for patients with schizophrenia.

FUNDING

German Ministry for Education and Research.

摘要

背景

许多心理社会和心理干预措施被用于精神分裂症患者,但它们在预防复发方面的相对疗效尚不清楚。我们旨在评估心理社会和心理干预措施预防精神分裂症复发的疗效、可接受性和耐受性。

方法

为了进行这项系统评价和网络荟萃分析,我们检索了已发表和未发表的随机对照试验,这些试验调查了旨在预防精神分裂症患者复发的心理社会或心理干预措施。我们检索了 EMBASE、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、BIOSIS、 Cochrane 图书馆、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台和 ClinicalTrials.gov,截至 2020 年 1 月 20 日,并检索了 PubMed 截至 2020 年 4 月 14 日。我们纳入了在成年人中进行的开放性和盲法研究,患有精神分裂症或相关障碍。我们排除了所有患者都处于急性发病期、伴有合并医学或精神疾病、或处于前驱期或“有精神病风险”的研究。研究选择和数据提取由两名独立的审阅者根据已发表和未发表的报告以及与研究作者联系进行。数据提取了干预措施的疗效、耐受性和可接受性;潜在的效果调节因素;以及研究质量和特征。主要结局是采用操作性标准或精神科住院治疗来衡量的复发。我们进行了随机效应网络荟萃分析,以计算优势比(OR)或标准化均数差异(SMD)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。研究方案在 PROSPERO、CRD42019147884 中进行了注册。

发现

通过数据库搜索确定了 27765 项研究,通过先前的综述和研究参考文献确定了 330 项研究。我们在去除重复项后筛选了 28000 条记录。通过标题和摘要筛选排除了 24060 条记录,对 3594 篇全文文章进行了资格评估。然后排除了 3350 篇文章,因为有各种原因,244 篇全文文章对应 85 项研究被纳入定性综合分析。其中,72 项研究共纳入 10364 名参与者(3939 名女性和 5716 名男性,其中性别有说明),纳入了网络荟萃分析。这些随机对照试验比较了 20 种主要作为抗精神病药物附加治疗的心理干预措施。没有可用的种族数据。家庭干预(OR 0.35,95%CI 0.24-0.52)、复发预防计划(OR 0.33,0.14-0.79)、认知行为疗法(OR 0.45,0.27-0.75)、家庭心理教育(OR 0.56,0.39-0.82)、综合干预(OR 0.62,0.44-0.87)和患者心理教育(OR 0.63,0.42-0.94)在 1 年内降低复发的效果优于常规治疗。估计的置信度从中等到非常低不等。我们没有发现发表偏倚的迹象。

解释

我们发现家庭干预、家庭心理教育和认知行为疗法在降低复发风险方面具有明显的益处。这些治疗方法应该是精神分裂症患者长期治疗中首先考虑的心理社会干预措施。

资助

德国联邦教育和研究部。

相似文献

1
Psychosocial and psychological interventions for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.精神分裂症复发预防的心理社会和心理干预:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;8(11):969-980. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00243-1. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
2
Psychological and psychosocial interventions for treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗精神分裂症治疗抵抗的心理和心理社会干预:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;11(7):545-553. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00136-6.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
E-Health interventions for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents with long-term physical conditions.针对患有长期身体疾病的儿童和青少年焦虑与抑郁的电子健康干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 15;8(8):CD012489. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012489.pub2.
7
Early intervention for psychosis.精神病的早期干预
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD004718. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004718.pub2.
8
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
9
Comparative efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of children, adolescents, and young adults with Tourette's syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较药物干预治疗儿童、青少年和青年期抽动秽语综合征的疗效、耐受性和可接受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 Feb;7(2):112-126. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00316-9. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
10
Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.非 ICU 住院患者预防谵妄的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013307.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring peer education for migrant informal caregivers of mentally ill loved ones: a realist evaluation protocol.探索针对患有精神疾病亲人的移民非正式照料者的同伴教育:一项实在论评价方案。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 13;13:1623903. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1623903. eCollection 2025.
2
A Multi-Omics Integration Framework with Automated Machine Learning Identifies Peripheral Immune-Coagulation Biomarkers for Schizophrenia Risk Stratification.一种具有自动化机器学习的多组学整合框架可识别用于精神分裂症风险分层的外周免疫凝血生物标志物。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 7;26(15):7640. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157640.
3
Patient-centered group psychotherapy for depression and negative emotions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
以患者为中心的抑郁症和负面情绪团体心理治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 7;16:1530615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1530615. eCollection 2025.
4
Editorial: Case reports in Schizophrenia and psychotic disorders: 2023.社论:精神分裂症和精神障碍的病例报告:2023年
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 5;16:1623129. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1623129. eCollection 2025.
5
Effect of individualized psychological interventions on the psychological state and pregnancy outcomes of patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion.个体化心理干预对复发性自然流产患者心理状态及妊娠结局的影响
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 May;41(5):1470-1474. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.5.10466.
6
Nursing strategies for implementing psychosocial interventions to address violence behavior in schizophrenia: a scoping review.实施心理社会干预以解决精神分裂症暴力行为的护理策略:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 8;24(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03145-2.
7
Mindfulness improves negative psychotic symptoms through reducing emotional and social withdrawal.正念通过减少情感和社交退缩来改善阴性精神病性症状。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 19;15(4):103362. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i4.103362.
8
Unraveling the complex relationships between anxiety, depression, and quality of life in schizophrenia: a network analysis study.解析精神分裂症中焦虑、抑郁与生活质量之间的复杂关系:一项网络分析研究
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02011-1.
9
Bibliotherapy and Schizophrenia: A Stanghellinian Perspective.阅读疗法与精神分裂症:斯坦盖利尼视角
Psychopathology. 2025 Mar 25:1-11. doi: 10.1159/000545471.
10
Do Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Interventions Lead to Schema Change in People With Psychosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.认知行为疗法干预是否会导致精神病患者的图式改变?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Mar-Apr;32(2):e70049. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70049.