Li Jinzhang, Li Lei, Wang Maozhou, Li Haiyang, Sun Lizhong, Liu Yongmin, Fan Ruixin, Zhang Zonggang, Zou Chengwei, Zhang Hongjia, Gong Ming
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 27;8:689507. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.689507. eCollection 2021.
It is unclear whether the total arch replacement (TAR) combined with frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation and hybrid debranching surgery have a difference in the prognosis of patients with type A acute aortic syndrome (AAS). We attempted to compare the short-term and long-term prognosis of total arch replacement (TAR) combined with frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation and hybrid debranching surgery in patients with type A acute aortic syndrome (AAS). From January 2014 to September 2020, a total of 518 patients who underwent TAR with FET surgery and 31 patients who underwent hybrid surgery were included. We analyzed the post-operative mortality and morbidity of complications of the two surgical methods, and we determined 67 patients for subgroup analysis through a 1:2 propensity score match (PSM). We identified risk factors for patient mortality and post-operative neurological complications through multivariate regression analysis. Compared with the TAR with FET group, hybrid surgery could reduce aortic cross-clamp time, reduce intraoperative blood loss and prevent some patients from cardiopulmonary bypass. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the TAR with FET group and the hybrid surgery group (10.6 vs. 9.7%). However, hybrid surgery had increased the incidence of permanent neurological complications in patients (95%CI: 4.7-35.7%, = 0.001), especially post-operative cerebral infarction ( < 0.001). During the average follow-up period of 31.6 months, there was no significant difference in the 1-year survival rate and 3-year survival rate between the TAR with FET group and the hybrid surgery group ( = 0.811), but hybrid surgery increased the incidence of long-term neurological complications ( < 0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, surgical methods were not a risk factor for post-operative deaths, but hybrid surgery was a risk factor for post-operative neurological complications ( < 0.001). Hybrid surgery is an acceptable treatment for AAS, and its post-operative mortality is similar to FET. But hybrid surgery may increase the risk of permanent neurological complications after surgery, and this risk must be carefully considered when choosing hybrid surgery.
全弓置换(TAR)联合冰冻象鼻(FET)植入术与杂交去分支手术在A型急性主动脉综合征(AAS)患者的预后方面是否存在差异尚不清楚。我们试图比较全弓置换(TAR)联合冰冻象鼻(FET)植入术与杂交去分支手术在A型急性主动脉综合征(AAS)患者中的短期和长期预后。2014年1月至2020年9月,共纳入518例行TAR联合FET手术的患者和31例行杂交手术的患者。我们分析了两种手术方法术后的死亡率和并发症发生率,并通过1:2倾向评分匹配(PSM)确定67例患者进行亚组分析。我们通过多因素回归分析确定了患者死亡和术后神经并发症的危险因素。与TAR联合FET组相比,杂交手术可缩短主动脉阻断时间,减少术中失血,并使部分患者避免体外循环。TAR联合FET组与杂交手术组的30天死亡率无显著差异(10.6%对9.7%)。然而,杂交手术增加了患者永久性神经并发症的发生率(95%CI:4.7 - 35.7%,P = 0.001),尤其是术后脑梗死(P < 0.001)。在平均31.6个月的随访期内,TAR联合FET组与杂交手术组的1年生存率和3年生存率无显著差异(P = 0.811),但杂交手术增加了长期神经并发症的发生率(P < 0.001)。在多因素回归分析中,手术方式不是术后死亡的危险因素,但杂交手术是术后神经并发症的危险因素(P < 0.001)。杂交手术是AAS的一种可接受的治疗方法,其术后死亡率与FET相似。但杂交手术可能增加术后永久性神经并发症的风险,在选择杂交手术时必须仔细考虑这一风险。