• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听性脑干对单斜率刺激的反应。斜率和极性的影响。

Auditory brainstem responses to single-slope stimuli. The influence of steepness and polarity.

作者信息

Gerull G, Mrowinski D, Janssen T, Anft D

机构信息

E.N.T. Clinic Charlottenburg, Free University of Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Scand Audiol. 1987;16(4):227-35. doi: 10.3109/01050398709074945.

DOI:10.3109/01050398709074945
PMID:3438705
Abstract

Click polarity has little influence on brainstem potentials. We applied an auditory stimulus similar to a step function generated in a closed acoustic system. The influence of stimulus onset steepness (comprising rise time and intensity) on wave V latency and amplitude was investigated. A remarkable latency prolongation was observed for condensation (C) compared with rarefaction (R), if a sharp bend at the foot of the slope was avoided. The C latency lag was nearly the amount of rise time. The effect can be explained by cochlear travel time. Wave V amplitude for R slopes was significantly enhanced. At high intensity and short rise time, it reached twice the values found with C slopes, or with clicks of either polarity. Although the explanations found are not yet satisfactory, a clinical application in cochlear diagnosis is predictable.

摘要

点击极性对脑干电位影响很小。我们应用了一种类似于在封闭声学系统中产生的阶跃函数的听觉刺激。研究了刺激起始陡度(包括上升时间和强度)对V波潜伏期和振幅的影响。如果避免斜坡底部出现急剧弯曲,与疏波(R)相比,密波(C)可观察到明显的潜伏期延长。C波潜伏期延迟几乎与上升时间的量相同。这种效应可以用耳蜗传播时间来解释。R波斜率的V波振幅显著增强。在高强度和短上升时间时,其值达到C波斜率或任何一种极性点击时所发现值的两倍。尽管所找到的解释尚不令人满意,但在耳蜗诊断中的临床应用是可预见的。

相似文献

1
Auditory brainstem responses to single-slope stimuli. The influence of steepness and polarity.听性脑干对单斜率刺激的反应。斜率和极性的影响。
Scand Audiol. 1987;16(4):227-35. doi: 10.3109/01050398709074945.
2
Compound action potentials recorded from the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve in man: effects of stimulus intensity and polarity.从人类听神经颅内部分记录的复合动作电位:刺激强度和极性的影响。
Audiology. 1991;30(3):142-63. doi: 10.3109/00206099109072880.
3
The effects of stimulus rise-time and polarity on the auditory brainstem responses.
Scand Audiol. 1984;13(2):119-27. doi: 10.3109/01050398409043050.
4
Brainstem and cochlea potentials evoked by rarefaction and condensation single-slope stimuli. A preliminary report.稀疏和密集单斜率刺激诱发的脑干及耳蜗电位:初步报告
Scand Audiol. 1985;14(3):141-50. doi: 10.3109/01050398509045935.
5
Auditory brain stem responses from human infants: pure-tone masking profiles for clicks and filtered clicks.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Aug;78(2):555-62. doi: 10.1121/1.392422.
6
The 40-Hz event-related potential as a measure of auditory sensitivity in normals.作为正常人听觉敏感性指标的40赫兹事件相关电位。
Scand Audiol. 1985;14(1):51-5. doi: 10.3109/01050398509045922.
7
The effect of sleep on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and the middle latency response (MLR).
Scand Audiol. 1985;14(1):47-50. doi: 10.3109/01050398509045921.
8
Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.同侧、对侧及双耳掩蔽效应对人类脑干对短声刺激的听觉诱发反应的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Apr;89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. doi: 10.1121/1.401010.
9
Brain stem potentials evoked by binaural click stimuli with differences in interaural time and intensity.双耳点击刺激诱发的脑干电位,具有双耳时间和强度差异。
Audiology. 1984;23(3):265-76. doi: 10.3109/00206098409072839.
10
Brainstem responses to tone pip and click stimuli.
Ear Hear. 1980 Jul-Aug;1(4):181-4. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198007000-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of 3 ABR Methods for Diagnosis of Retrocochlear Hearing Impairment.三种听性脑干反应(ABR)方法用于诊断蜗后性听力损失的比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2015 Dec 7;21:3814-24. doi: 10.12659/msm.895291.
2
Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials.极性刺激对脑干听觉诱发电位的影响。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Sep-Oct;74(5):725-730. doi: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31383-5.