Lin Tianye, Yang Peng, Cai Kaishen, Li Ziqi, Pang Fengxiang, Zhang Qingwen, He Wei, Wei Qiushi
The First Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510080, P.R.China.
Guangdong Research Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510405, P.R.China.
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 15;35(8):967-972. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202103168.
To explore the predictive effect of the femoral neck strength composite indexes on femoral head collapse in non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) compared with bone turnover marker.
The non-traumatic ONFH patients who were admitted and received non-surgical treatment between January 2010 and December 2016 as the research object. And 96 cases (139 hips) met the selection criteria and were included in the study. There were 54 males (79 hips) and 42 females (60 hips), with an average age of 40.2 years (range, 22-60 years). According to whether the femoral head collapsed during follow-up, the patients were divided into collapsed group and non-collapsed group. The femoral neck width, hip axis length, height, body weight, and bone mineral density of femoral neck were measured. The femoral neck strength composite indexes, including the compressive strength index (CSI), bending strength index (BSI), and impact strength index (ISI), were calculated. The bone turnover marker, including the total typeⅠcollagen amino terminal elongation peptide (t-P1NP), β-crosslaps (β-CTx), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), 25 hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], and N-terminal osteocalcin (N-MID), were measured. The age, gender, height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density of femoral neck, etiology, Japanese Osteonecrosis Investigation Committee (JIC) classification, femoral neck strength composite indexes, and bone turnover marker were compared between the two groups, and the influencing factors of the occurrence of femoral head collapse were initially screened. Then the significant variables in the femoral neck strength composite indexes and bone turnover marker were used for logistic regression analysis to screen risk factors; and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the significant variables' impact on non-traumatic ONFH.
All patients were followed up 3.2 years on average (range, 2-4 years). During follow-up, 46 cases (64 hips) had femoral head collapse (collapsed group), and the remaining 50 cases (75 hips) did not experience femoral head collapse (non-collapsed group). Univariate analysis showed that the difference in JIC classification between the two groups was significant ( =-7.090, =0.000); however, the differences in age, gender, height, body weight, BMI, bone mineral density of femoral neck, and etiology were not significant ( >0.05). In the femoral neck strength composite indexes, the CSI, BSI, and ISI of the collapsed group were significantly lower than those of the non-collapsed group ( <0.05); in the bone turnover marker, the t-P1NP and β-CTx of the collapsed group were significantly lower than those of the non-collapsed group ( <0.05); there was no significant difference in N-MID, 25(OH)D or ALP between groups ( >0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the CSI, ISI, and t-P1NP were risk factors for femoral collapse in patients with non-traumatic ONFH ( <0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the cut-off points of CSI, BSI, ISI, t-P1NP, and β-CTx were 6.172, 2.435, 0.465, 57.193, and 0.503, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were 0.753, 0.642, 0.903, 0.626, and 0.599, respectively.
The femoral neck strength composite indexes can predict the femoral head collapse in non-traumatic ONFH better than the bone turnover marker. ISI of 0.465 is a potential cut-off point below which future collapse of early non-traumatic ONFH can be predicted.
探讨股骨颈强度复合指标与骨转换标志物相比,对非创伤性股骨头坏死(ONFH)患者股骨头塌陷的预测作用。
选取2010年1月至2016年12月收治并接受非手术治疗的非创伤性ONFH患者作为研究对象。96例(139髋)符合入选标准并纳入研究。其中男性54例(79髋),女性42例(60髋),平均年龄40.2岁(范围22 - 60岁)。根据随访期间股骨头是否塌陷,将患者分为塌陷组和未塌陷组。测量股骨颈宽度、髋轴长度、身高、体重及股骨颈骨密度。计算股骨颈强度复合指标,包括抗压强度指数(CSI)、抗弯强度指数(BSI)和抗冲击强度指数(ISI)。检测骨转换标志物,包括Ⅰ型胶原氨基端前肽(t - P1NP)、β - 交联羧基末端肽(β - CTx)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、25羟维生素D[25(OH)D]和N端骨钙素(N - MID)。比较两组患者的年龄、性别、身高、体重、体重指数(BMI)、股骨颈骨密度、病因、日本骨坏死调查委员会(JIC)分类、股骨颈强度复合指标及骨转换标志物,初步筛选股骨头塌陷发生的影响因素。然后将股骨颈强度复合指标和骨转换标志物中的显著变量进行logistic回归分析以筛选危险因素;采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定显著变量对非创伤性ONFH的影响。
所有患者平均随访3.2年(范围2 - 4年)。随访期间,46例(64髋)发生股骨头塌陷(塌陷组),其余50例(75髋)未发生股骨头塌陷(未塌陷组)。单因素分析显示,两组间JIC分类差异有统计学意义(=-7.090,=0.000);而年龄、性别、身高、体重、BMI、股骨颈骨密度及病因差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。在股骨颈强度复合指标中,塌陷组的CSI、BSI和ISI均显著低于未塌陷组(<0.05);在骨转换标志物中,塌陷组的t - P1NP和β - CTx均显著低于未塌陷组(<0.05);两组间N - MID、25(OH)D或ALP差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。多因素分析显示,CSI、ISI和t - P1NP是非创伤性ONFH患者股骨头塌陷的危险因素(<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,CSI、BSI、ISI、t - P1NP和β - CTx的截断点分别为6.172、2.435、0.465、57.193和0.503,ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.753、0.642、0.903、0.626和0.599。
股骨颈强度复合指标比骨转换标志物能更好地预测非创伤性ONFH患者的股骨头塌陷。ISI为0.465是一个潜在的截断点,低于该值可预测早期非创伤性ONFH未来的塌陷。