Tweeddale P M, Alexander F, McHardy G J
Lothian Area Respiratory Function Service, University of Edinburgh.
Thorax. 1987 Jul;42(7):487-90. doi: 10.1136/thx.42.7.487.
Short term variability in FEV1 and responsiveness to inhaled bronchodilator were measured in 150 patients with obstructive ventilatory defects. The range of initial FEV1 was 0.5-4.71 and the natural variability over a 20 minute period when expressed in absolute terms was similar over the entire range, and differed insignificantly from that found in normal subjects. The increase in FEV1 and vital capacity (VC) required to exclude natural variability with 95% confidence in these patients was 160 ml and 330 ml respectively. Natural variability when expressed in percentage terms was negatively correlated with the level of FEV1 recorded. The analysis of changes in FEV1 and VC after administration of bronchodilator used absolute and percentage criteria for response. The number of responders differed considerably according to the criterion used. In those defined by the absolute criterion as responders there was no evidence that size of response was related to level of FEV1. Percentage criteria have traditionally been used to identify responses to bronchodilator that may be clinically useful, while absolute criteria, although statistically valid, have not been favoured. Reappraisal of the criteria used and their limitations and implications is required.
对150例存在阻塞性通气功能障碍的患者测量了第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的短期变异性以及对吸入性支气管扩张剂的反应性。初始FEV1的范围为0.5 - 4.71,在20分钟内以绝对值表示的自然变异性在整个范围内相似,与正常受试者的情况无显著差异。在这些患者中,要以95%的置信度排除自然变异性所需的FEV1和肺活量(VC)的增加量分别为160毫升和330毫升。以百分比表示的自然变异性与记录的FEV1水平呈负相关。在给予支气管扩张剂后,对FEV1和VC变化的分析采用了反应的绝对标准和百分比标准。根据所使用的标准,反应者的数量有很大差异。在那些被绝对标准定义为反应者的患者中,没有证据表明反应的大小与FEV1水平有关。传统上一直使用百分比标准来识别对支气管扩张剂可能具有临床意义的反应,而绝对标准虽然在统计学上有效,但并未受到青睐。需要重新评估所使用的标准及其局限性和影响。