Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停后目标温度管理:温度目标的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Targeted temperature management following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of temperature targets.

机构信息

Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2021 Oct;47(10):1078-1088. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06505-z. Epub 2021 Aug 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Targeted temperature management (TTM) may improve survival and functional outcome in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), though the optimal target temperature remains unknown. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of deep hypothermia (31-32 °C), moderate hypothermia (33-34 °C), mild hypothermia (35-36 °C), and normothermia (37-37.8 °C) during TTM.

METHODS

We searched six databases from inception to June 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating TTM in comatose OHCA survivors. Two reviewers performed screening, full text review, and extraction independently. The primary outcome of interest was survival with good functional outcome. We used GRADE to rate our certainty in estimates.

RESULTS

We included 10 RCTs (4218 patients). Compared with normothermia, deep hypothermia (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-2.30), moderate hypothermia (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.92-1.94) and mild hypothermia (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.74-2.80) may have no effect on survival with good functional outcome (all low certainty). Deep hypothermia may not improve survival with good functional outcome, as compared to moderate hypothermia (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.61-1.54, low certainty). Moderate hypothermia (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.86-1.77) and deep hypothermia (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.70-2.32) may have no effect on survival, as compared to normothermia. Finally, incidence of arrhythmia was higher with moderate hypothermia (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.08-1.94) and deep hypothermia (OR 3.58, 95% CI 1.77-7.26), compared to normothermia (both high certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Mild, moderate, or deep hypothermia may not improve survival or functional outcome after OHCA, as compared to normothermia. Moderate and deep hypothermia were associated with higher incidence of arrhythmia. Routine use of moderate or deep hypothermia in comatose survivors of OHCA may potentially be associated with more harm than benefit.

摘要

目的

目标温度管理(TTM)可能会改善院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后昏迷幸存者的生存和功能预后,但最佳目标温度仍不清楚。我们进行了一项系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以调查 TTM 期间深度低温(31-32°C)、中度低温(33-34°C)、轻度低温(35-36°C)和正常体温(37-37.8°C)的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们从成立到 2021 年 6 月在六个数据库中搜索了评估 OHCA 昏迷幸存者 TTM 的随机对照试验(RCT)。两名审查员独立进行筛选、全文审查和提取。主要结局是有良好功能结局的存活率。我们使用 GRADE 来评估我们对估计的确定性。

结果

我们纳入了 10 项 RCT(4218 名患者)。与正常体温相比,深度低温(比值比[OR]1.30,95%置信区间[CI]0.73-2.30)、中度低温(OR1.34,95%CI0.92-1.94)和轻度低温(OR1.44,95%CI0.74-2.80)可能对有良好功能结局的存活率没有影响(所有低确定性)。与中度低温相比,深度低温可能不会改善有良好功能结局的存活率(OR0.97,95%CI0.61-1.54,低确定性)。与正常体温相比,中度低温(OR1.23,95%CI0.86-1.77)和深度低温(OR1.27,95%CI0.70-2.32)可能对存活率没有影响。最后,与正常体温相比,中度低温(OR1.45,95%CI1.08-1.94)和深度低温(OR3.58,95%CI1.77-7.26)的心律失常发生率更高(均为高确定性)。

结论

与正常体温相比,轻度、中度或深度低温可能不会改善 OHCA 后患者的生存率或功能结局。中度和深度低温与更高的心律失常发生率相关。在 OHCA 昏迷幸存者中常规使用中度或深度低温可能与更多的伤害而不是益处相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验