• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌筛查随访依从性的种族差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Racial Differences in Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening Follow-up: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Kunitomo Yukiko, Bade Brett, Gunderson Craig G, Akgün Kathleen M, Brackett Alexandria, Cain Hilary, Tanoue Lynn, Bastian Lori A

机构信息

Pain Research, Informatics, Multi-morbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT; Department of Internal Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT; Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):266-275. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.2172. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.2172
PMID:34390706
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2013, the United States Preventive Services Taskforce instituted recommendations for annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose chest CT imaging for high-risk individuals. LCS reduces lung cancer mortality, with greater reduction observed in Black participants in clinical trials. Although racial disparities in lung cancer mortality have been well documented, less is known about disparities in LCS participation and adherence to follow-up in clinical practice.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the association between race and adherence to LCS follow-up?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted through a search of published studies in MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Database from database inception through October 2020. We included studies that examined rates of adherence to LCS follow-up and compared rates by race. Studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We screened 18,300 titles and abstracts, and 229 studies were selected for full-text review. Nine studies met inclusion criteria; seven were included in the meta-analysis. Median adherent follow-up rate was 37% (range, 16%-82%). Notable differences among the studies included the proportion of the Black population (range, 4%-47%) and the structure of the LCS programs. The meta-analyses showed lower adherence to LCS follow-up in the Black population (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.80). This disparity persisted across all malignancy risk levels determined by initial screening results.

INTERPRETATION

Lower adherence to LCS follow-up in Black compared with White patients occurs despite the higher potential lung cancer mortality benefit. Literature specifically addressing race-related barriers to LCS adherence remains limited. To ensure equity in LCS benefits, greater outreach to eligible Black patients should be implemented through increased physician education and use of screening program coordinators to focus on this patient population.

TRIAL REGISTRY

PROSPERO; No.: CRD42020214213; URL: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO.

摘要

背景

2013年,美国预防服务工作组针对高危个体制定了每年进行低剂量胸部CT成像肺癌筛查(LCS)的建议。LCS可降低肺癌死亡率,在临床试验中,黑人参与者的死亡率降低幅度更大。尽管肺癌死亡率的种族差异已有充分记录,但对于临床实践中LCS参与率和后续随访依从性的差异了解较少。

研究问题

种族与LCS后续随访依从性之间有何关联?

研究设计与方法

通过检索MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE、科学网和护理及联合健康文献累积索引数据库中从建库至2020年10月发表的研究进行系统评价。我们纳入了检查LCS后续随访依从率并按种族比较率的研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析对研究进行汇总。

结果

我们筛选了18300个标题和摘要,选择了229项研究进行全文审查。9项研究符合纳入标准;7项纳入荟萃分析。中位依从性随访率为37%(范围为16%-82%)。研究之间的显著差异包括黑人人口比例(范围为4%-47%)和LCS项目结构。荟萃分析显示黑人人群对LCS后续随访的依从性较低(OR,0.67;95%CI,0.55-0.80)。这种差异在根据初始筛查结果确定的所有恶性肿瘤风险水平中均持续存在。

解读

尽管肺癌死亡率潜在获益更高,但黑人患者与白人患者相比,对LCS后续随访的依从性较低。专门探讨与种族相关的LCS依从性障碍的文献仍然有限。为确保LCS益处的公平性,应通过加强医生教育和利用筛查项目协调员关注这一患者群体,对符合条件的黑人患者进行更多宣传。

试验注册

PROSPERO;编号:CRD42020214213;网址:http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO 。

相似文献

1
Racial Differences in Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening Follow-up: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肺癌筛查随访依从性的种族差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):266-275. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.2172. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
2
Evidence of Racial Disparities in the Lung Cancer Screening Process: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.种族差异在肺癌筛查过程中的证据:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3731-3738. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07613-2. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
Racial Disparities in Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Recommended Follow-Up Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study.种族差异对年度肺癌筛查和推荐的随访护理的遵从性的影响:一项多中心队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Sep;19(9):1561-1569. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1253OC.
4
Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Investigation.肺癌筛查中的种族差异:一项探索性研究。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Oct;110(5):424-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
5
Racial Differences in Lung Cancer Screening Beliefs and Screening Adherence.肺癌筛查信念和筛查依从性的种族差异。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2021 Nov;22(6):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
6
Patient Adherence to Screening for Lung Cancer in the US: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.美国肺癌筛查中患者的依从性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2025102. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25102.
7
Adherence to Follow-up Testing Recommendations in US Veterans Screened for Lung Cancer, 2015-2019.2015-2019 年美国肺癌筛查退伍军人的随访检测建议依从性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116233. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16233.
8
Black patients referred to a lung cancer screening program experience lower rates of screening and longer time to follow-up.黑人患者被转诊至肺癌筛查项目时,其接受筛查的比例较低,且后续的随访时间也更长。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):561. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06923-0.
9
Patient Adherence to Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System-Recommended Screening Intervals in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.美国患者对肺部 CT 筛查报告和数据系统推荐筛查间隔的依从性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2022 Jan;17(1):38-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
10
Lung cancer screening use and implications of varying eligibility criteria by race and ethnicity: 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data.肺癌筛查的使用情况以及不同种族和族裔的不同资格标准的影响:2019 年行为风险因素监测系统数据。
Cancer. 2022 May 1;128(9):1812-1819. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34098. Epub 2022 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to Improve Adherence to Clinical Guidelines for the Management and Follow-Up of Pulmonary Nodules: A Systematic Review.改善肺结节管理与随访临床指南依从性的干预措施:一项系统评价
Chest. 2025 Jul;168(1):248-268. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.031. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
2
Trends and regional variations in chronic ischemic heart disease and lung cancer-related mortality among American adults: Insights from retrospective CDC wonder analysis.美国成年人慢性缺血性心脏病和肺癌相关死亡率的趋势及地区差异:来自疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)Wonder回顾性分析的见解
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2025 Feb 14;24:200377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2025.200377. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Racism, discrimination, medical mistrust, stigma, and lung cancer screening: a scoping review.
种族主义、歧视、医疗不信任、污名化与肺癌筛查:一项范围综述
Ethn Health. 2025 Apr;30(3):372-397. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2025.2458303. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
4
Disruptions in Lung Cancer Detection During COVID-19.新冠疫情期间肺癌检测的中断情况。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;16(23):4001. doi: 10.3390/cancers16234001.
5
A study protocol for a mixed-method environmental scan of contextual factors that influence lung cancer screening adherence.一项关于影响肺癌筛查依从性的背景因素的混合方法环境扫描的研究方案。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Nov 6;5(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00658-w.
6
Lexicon for blood-based early detection and screening: BLOODPAC consensus document.基于血液的早期检测和筛查词汇表:BLOODPAC 共识文件。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Sep;17(9):e70016. doi: 10.1111/cts.70016.
7
Patient Lung Cancer Screening Decisions and Environmental and Psychosocial Factors.患者肺癌筛查决策与环境及心理社会因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412880. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12880.
8
Lung cancer in the emergency department.急诊科中的肺癌
Emerg Cancer Care. 2023;2(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s44201-023-00018-9. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
9
Barriers and Facilitators Impacting Lung Cancer Screening Uptake Among Black Veterans: A Qualitative Study.影响黑人群体中肺癌筛查参与的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Apr 18;22(4):231-236. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7098.
10
An alternating-intervention pilot trial on the impact of an informational handout on patient-reported outcomes and follow-up after lung cancer screening.一项关于信息手册对肺癌筛查后患者报告结果和随访影响的交替干预先导试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 10;19(4):e0300352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300352. eCollection 2024.