Suppr超能文献

外科医生行选择性前路/侧路腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性脊柱疾病的专业特长是否与早期围手术期结果相关?

Does the Specialty of the Surgeon Performing Elective Anterior/Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease Correlate with Early Perioperative Outcomes?

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2021 Nov;155:e111-e118. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comparative effectiveness research has a vital role in health reform and policies. Specialty training is one of these provider-side variables, and surgeons performing the same procedure who were trained in different specialties may have different outcomes. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of spine surgeon specialty (neurosurgery vs. orthopedic surgery) on early perioperative outcome measures of elective anterior/lateral lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF/LLIF) for degenerative disc diseases.

METHODS

In a retrospective, 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort study, 9070 patients were reviewed from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Propensity score matching and subgroup analysis were used.

RESULTS

In both groups (single-level and multilevel ALIF/LLIF), patients operated on by neurosurgeons had longer operative time (188 minutes vs. 172 minutes/239 minutes vs. 221 minutes); shorter total hospital stay (71 hours vs. 90 hours/89 hours vs. 96 hours); and lower rates of return to the operating room (2.1% vs. 4.1%/2.4% vs. 4.2%), nonhome discharge (8.7% vs. 11.1%/10.1% vs. 14.9%), discharge after postoperative day 3 (22.0% vs. 30.0%/38.0% vs. 43.9%), and perioperative blood transfusion (2.1% vs. 5.1%/5.0% vs. 9.9%) (P < 0.05). In multilevel ALIF/LLIF, patients operated on by neurosurgeons had lower readmission rates (3.9% vs. 6.9%) (P < 0.05). Other outcome measures and mortality rates were similar between the single-level and multilevel ALIF/LLIF cohorts regardless of surgeon specialty.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis found significant differences in early perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing ALIF/LLIF by neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. These differences have significant clinical and cost implications for patients, physicians, program directors, payers, and health systems.

摘要

背景

比较疗效研究在卫生改革和政策中具有重要作用。专科培训是这些提供者变量之一,接受不同专业培训的执行相同手术的外科医生可能会有不同的结果。本研究的目的是调查脊柱外科医生的专业(神经外科与骨科)对退行性椎间盘疾病的选择性前路/外侧腰椎体间融合术(ALIF/LLIF)的早期围手术期结果测量值的影响。

方法

在回顾性、1:1 倾向评分匹配队列研究中,从美国外科医师学院国家手术质量改进计划数据库中回顾了 9070 例患者。使用倾向评分匹配和亚组分析。

结果

在两组(单节段和多节段 ALIF/LLIF)中,由神经外科医生进行手术的患者手术时间更长(188 分钟比 172 分钟/239 分钟比 221 分钟);总住院时间更短(71 小时比 90 小时/89 小时比 96 小时);并且返回手术室的比率较低(2.1%比 4.1%/2.4%比 4.2%),非家庭出院率较低(8.7%比 11.1%/10.1%比 14.9%),术后第 3 天出院率较高(22.0%比 30.0%/38.0%比 43.9%),围手术期输血率较低(2.1%比 5.1%/5.0%比 9.9%)(P<0.05)。在多节段 ALIF/LLIF 中,由神经外科医生进行手术的患者再入院率较低(3.9%比 6.9%)(P<0.05)。无论外科医生的专业如何,单节段和多节段 ALIF/LLIF 队列的其他结果测量值和死亡率相似。

结论

我们的分析发现,接受神经外科医生和骨科医生治疗的 ALIF/LLIF 患者的早期围手术期结果存在显著差异。这些差异对患者、医生、项目主任、支付者和医疗保健系统具有重要的临床和成本意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验