文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

退行性腰椎手术中骨科医生与神经外科医生手术效果及成本效益的比较评估:一项采用成对和比例Meta分析的系统评价

Comparative assessment of surgical outcomes and cost-efficiency between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons in degenerative lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review with pairwise and proportional meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Yixi, Zhang Rui, Huang Qiuyuan, Xiao Yang, Kahaer Alafate, Rexiti Paerhati, Xia Ming

机构信息

Department of Minimally Invasive Spine and Precision Orthopedics, Orthopedic Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.

Evidence-Based Medicine Research Center, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 18;48(1):308. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03452-x.


DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03452-x
PMID:40102318
Abstract

This study combines pairwise and proportional meta-analyses to evaluate differences in outcomes and cost-efficiency between neurosurgeons (NS) and orthopedic surgeons (OS) for lumbar degenerative disease. Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Ovid, Web of Science, and Springer Link were searched for studies comparing NS and OS outcomes. Results for pairwise meta-analysis were generated with the "metabin" function using standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous variables and odds ratios (OR) for binary variables, while the "metaprop" function was used to calculate pooled proportions in proportional meta-analysis. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024545992). Of the 457 search results, 7 studies were included. Compared to OS patients, NS patients exhibited significantly higher overall complication rates [OR: 1.09 (95% CI: 1.03-1.15); NS: 9.49%, OS: 8.92%], hospital costs [SMD: 0.30 (95% CI: 0.28-0.31); NS: $37,251.78, OS: $31,024.18], and hospital stays [SMD: 0.03 (95% CI: 0.01-0.04); NS: 3.32 days, OS: 3.23 days], while with no significant differences in superficial surgical site infections [OR: 1.12 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.31); NS: 1.70%, OS: 1.13%], deep surgical site infections [OR: 1.09 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.20); NS: 0.78%, OS: 0.67%], wound dehiscence [OR: 1.10 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.22); NS: 0.66%, OS: 0.57%], pneumonia [OR: 1.06 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.22); NS: 1.29%, OS: 1.13%], urinary tract infections [OR: 1.22 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.38); NS: 1.51%, OS: 1.31%], sepsis [OR: 1.25 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.61); NS: 0.80%, OS: 0.58%], or pulmonary embolism [OR: 1.13 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.51); NS: 0.41%, OS: 0.35%]. NS patients showed lower, though insignificant, rates of deep vein thrombosis [OR: 0.95; NS: 0.66%, OS: 0.57%], unplanned readmissions [OR: 1.00; NS: 4.64%, OS: 4.67%], and reoperations [OR: 0.91; NS: 3.94%, OS: 4.25%] compared to OS patients. Despite differing training backgrounds, NS and OS show comparable outcomes overall, with unique strengths suggesting that collaborative efforts may enhance lumbar surgery outcomes.

摘要

本研究结合了成对和比例元分析,以评估神经外科医生(NS)和骨科医生(OS)在腰椎退行性疾病治疗中的疗效差异和成本效益。按照PRISMA指南,检索了PubMed、ScienceDirect、Ovid、Web of Science和Springer Link等数据库,查找比较NS和OS治疗效果的研究。使用“metabin”函数生成成对元分析结果,连续变量采用标准化均数差(SMD),二元变量采用比值比(OR);比例元分析则使用“metaprop”函数计算合并比例。该研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024545992)。在457条检索结果中,纳入了7项研究。与OS患者相比,NS患者的总体并发症发生率显著更高[OR:1.09(95%CI:1.03 - 1.15);NS:9.49%,OS:8.92%]、住院费用[SMD:0.30(95%CI:0.28 - 0.31);NS:3,7251.78美元,OS:31,024.18美元]和住院天数[SMD:0.03(95%CI:0.01 - 0.04);NS:3.32天,OS:3.23天],而在浅表手术部位感染[OR:1.12(95%CI:0.97,1.31);NS:1.70%,OS:1.13%]、深部手术部位感染[OR:1.09(95%CI:0.99,1.20);NS:0.78%,OS:0.67%]、伤口裂开[OR:1.10(95%CI:0.98,1.22);NS:0.66%,OS:0.57%]、肺炎[OR:1.

相似文献

[1]
Comparative assessment of surgical outcomes and cost-efficiency between orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons in degenerative lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review with pairwise and proportional meta-analysis.

Neurosurg Rev. 2025-3-18

[2]
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Health Technol Assess. 2008-6

[3]
Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Spine J. 2021-6

[4]
Cost-utility of lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a systematic review.

Spine J. 2025-6

[5]
Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-11-1

[6]
Does the Application of Topical Vancomycin Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Spine Surgery? A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024-12-1

[7]
Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-2-14

[8]
Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Eur Spine J. 2024-3

[9]
Chewing gum for postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-2-20

[10]
Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Neurosurg Rev. 2018-7

本文引用的文献

[1]
Association between acute pain trajectory and patient-reported outcomes at 6-months following lumbar surgery for patients with lumbar degenerative disease.

Eur Spine J. 2024-12

[2]
Biomechanical Effect of Different Posterior Fixation Techniques on Stability and Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Treating Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture With Osteoporosis: A Finite Element Analysis.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024-8-1

[3]
30-and 90-day readmissions in lumbar spine surgery. Differences in prevalence and causes.

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023-11

[4]
Surgeon Experience Matters: An Exact Matched Analysis of TLIF Outcomes Demonstrates No Difference in Surgical Outcomes Between Experienced Neurosurgeons and Orthopedic Surgeons.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024-6-1

[5]
Treatment of adult deformity surgery by orthopedic and neurological surgeons: trends in treatment, techniques, and costs by specialty.

Spine J. 2023-9

[6]
Spine Surgical Subspecialty and Its Effect on Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023-5-1

[7]
Frequency and Associated Factors of Postoperative Wound Dehiscence in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

World Neurosurg. 2023-4

[8]
Direct medical costs after surgical or nonsurgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal disease: A nationwide matched cohort study with a 10-year follow-up.

PLoS One. 2021

[9]
Incidences and reasons of postoperative surgical site infection after lumbar spinal surgery: a large population study.

Eur Spine J. 2022-2

[10]
Does the Specialty of the Surgeon Performing Elective Anterior/Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease Correlate with Early Perioperative Outcomes?

World Neurosurg. 2021-11

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索