Singh Rika, Desai Shrikar R, Manjunath R G Shiva
Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Periodontology and Implantology, H. K. E. Society's, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India.
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Nov-Dec;27(6):600-606. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_531_22. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
The aim of this two dimensional (2D) finite element analysis study was to evaluate the influence of implant design (step and tapered) and length on stress distribution at bone implant interface, when placed in maxillary posterior bone under immediate loading protocol.
2D finite element models were developed to simulate the two types of implant designs, i.e., Tapered and step implants of 3.75-mm - Diameter and 6 and 10 mm lengths, respectively. Maxillary posterior bone quality (D4 bone) was simulated with a very thin cortical bone (0.5 mm) for the placement of implants. The respective material properties were assigned. The implant designs incorporated microthreads at the crestal part and rest of the implant body incorporated Acme threads. Forces of 100 Newtons were applied vertically and in oblique direction (at an angle of 45°) to long axis of the implants. Total deformation (micromovements), stresses and strains were evaluated at the bone implant interface.
The results of micromovements, stresses and strains were found to be lower for long implants as compared to short implants. Also, all the values were found to be higher for oblique loads as compared to vertical loads. The von mises stress values were highest for 6 mm step implants and lowest for 10 mm step implants.
In the presence of low bone density with optimal bone height, standard diameter long step implants can be used. Incorporation of microthreads at the crestal portion and acme threads for body portion of the implant presents a good option to be used under immediate loading protocol.
本二维有限元分析研究的目的是评估在即刻加载方案下,种植体设计(阶梯式和锥形)及长度对上颌后牙区种植体-骨界面应力分布的影响。
建立二维有限元模型,模拟两种种植体设计,即直径3.75mm、长度分别为6mm和10mm的锥形种植体和阶梯式种植体。用上颌后牙区骨质量(D4骨)模拟非常薄的皮质骨(0.5mm)以植入种植体。赋予各自的材料属性。种植体设计在颈部部分采用微螺纹,种植体主体其余部分采用梯形螺纹。沿种植体长轴垂直和倾斜方向(45°角)施加100牛顿的力。评估种植体-骨界面的总变形(微动)、应力和应变。
与短种植体相比,长种植体的微动、应力和应变结果更低。此外,与垂直载荷相比,倾斜载荷下所有值均更高。6mm阶梯式种植体的冯米塞斯应力值最高,10mm阶梯式种植体的最低。
在骨密度低但骨高度合适的情况下,可使用标准直径的长阶梯式种植体。在种植体颈部部分采用微螺纹,主体部分采用梯形螺纹,是即刻加载方案下的一个良好选择。