• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用预制SFI杆支持的轴向和直型种植体与下颌覆盖义齿周围的边缘骨丢失。

Marginal bone loss around axial and straight implants supported with prefabricated SFI-Bar with mandibular overdentures.

作者信息

Balehonnur Prema, Awinashe Vaibhav Nandakumar, Parihar Anuj Singh, Balaji Doddy Lokanathan, Kochhar Anuraj Singh, Mehndiratta Rajat

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Government dental college and research Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Department of Prosthodontics, College of dentistry in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Bioinformation. 2021 Jan 31;17(1):289-294. doi: 10.6026/97320630017289. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.6026/97320630017289
PMID:34393448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8340693/
Abstract

To assess the role of prefabricated SFI-Bar in peri-implant bone loss around immediately axially loaded and straight implants. This study comprised of 40 complete denture wearer patients who received two axially parallel implants connected by SFI-Bars in group I and two 15° mesially tilted implants connected by SFI-Bars in group II. Peri- implant bone loss (PiBL) was measured at 1 year, 2 years and 3 years. The mean PiBL at 1 year in group I was 0.21 mm and I group II was 0.22, at 2 years in group I was 0.26 mm and in group II was 0.23 mm and at 3 years, in group I was 0.29 mm and in group II was 0.34 mm. The difference was significant at 3 years (P< 0.05). The mean mesial PIBL at 1 year in group I was 0.18 mm, in group II was 0.20 mm, at 2 years in group I was 0.19 mm and in group II was 0.07 mm and at 3 years, in group I was 0.25 mm and in group II was 0.29 mm. The difference found to be significant in each time duration in both groups (P< 0.05).The mean distal PIBL at 1 year in group I was 0.23 mm, in group II was 0.22 mm, at 2 years in group I was 0.33 mm and in group II was 0.39 mm and at 3 years, in group I was 0.34 mm and in group II was 0.39 mm. The difference found to be significant at 2 and 3 years in both groups (P< 0.05). Authors found that mandibular overdentures retained with Prefabricated SFI-Bar with axial and straight inserted implants may be useful in patients with reduced bone height.

摘要

为评估预制SFI杆在即刻轴向加载的直种植体周围种植体周围骨丢失中的作用。本研究包括40名全口义齿佩戴患者,其中I组患者接受了由SFI杆连接的两颗轴向平行种植体,II组患者接受了由SFI杆连接的两颗向近中倾斜15°的种植体。在1年、2年和3年时测量种植体周围骨丢失(PiBL)。I组1年时的平均PiBL为0.21mm,II组为0.22mm;2年时I组为0.26mm,II组为0.23mm;3年时I组为0.29mm,II组为0.34mm。3年时差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。I组1年时的平均近中PiBL为0.18mm,II组为0.20mm;2年时I组为0.19mm,II组为0.07mm;3年时I组为0.25mm,II组为0.29mm。两组在各时间段差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。I组1年时的平均远中PiBL为0.23mm,II组为0.22mm;2年时I组为0.33mm,II组为0.39mm;3年时I组为0.34mm,II组为0.39mm。两组在2年和3年时差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。作者发现,对于骨高度降低的患者,使用预制SFI杆和轴向直植入种植体固位的下颌覆盖义齿可能是有用的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae8/8340693/e1badbcc5787/97320630017289F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae8/8340693/43533a2523d2/97320630017289F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae8/8340693/e1badbcc5787/97320630017289F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae8/8340693/43533a2523d2/97320630017289F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aae8/8340693/e1badbcc5787/97320630017289F2.jpg

相似文献

1
Marginal bone loss around axial and straight implants supported with prefabricated SFI-Bar with mandibular overdentures.采用预制SFI杆支持的轴向和直型种植体与下颌覆盖义齿周围的边缘骨丢失。
Bioinformation. 2021 Jan 31;17(1):289-294. doi: 10.6026/97320630017289. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.预制和定制的用于种植体支持下颌全口义齿的连接杆的比较。
Implant Dent. 2009 Dec;18(6):501-11. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181b4f857.
3
Long-term effect of overdenture bar design on peri-implant tissues.覆盖义齿连接杆设计对种植体周围组织的长期影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):1126-31. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2161.
4
Resilient Stud Versus Bar Attachments for Immediately Loaded Implants Supporting Mandibular Overdentures: 1-year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.弹性种植体与杆卡式附着体用于下颌覆盖义齿即刻负载的效果比较:一项为期 1 年的随机对照临床试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Mar-Apr;36(2):346-354. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8472.
5
Clips vs Resilient Liners Used With Bilateral Posterior Prefabricated Bars for Retaining Four Implant-Supported Mandibular Overdentures.用于固定四颗种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿的双侧后牙预制杆搭配钛夹与弹性衬垫的比较
J Oral Implantol. 2017 Aug;43(4):273-281. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00148. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
6
Effect of two designs of implant-supported overdentures on peri-implant and posterior mandibular bone resorptions: a 5-year prospective radiographic study.种植体支持覆盖义齿两种设计对种植体周围和下颌后骨吸收的影响:一项为期 5 年的前瞻性放射研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Oct;28(10):e184-e192. doi: 10.1111/clr.12984. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
7
Marginal bone loss and prosthetic maintenance of bar-retained implant-supported overdentures: a prospective study.杆卡式种植覆盖义齿修复后边缘骨吸收和义齿维护的前瞻性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):137-45.
8
Immediately loaded mini dental implants as overdenture retainers: 1-Year cohort study of implant stability and peri-implant marginal bone level.即刻负重微型牙种植体作为覆盖义齿固位体:种植体稳定性和种植体周围边缘骨水平的1年队列研究
Ann Anat. 2015 May;199:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2013.12.005. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
9
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading.即刻负重种植体支持下颌覆盖义齿的临床及影像学评估
Implant Dent. 2007 Jun;16(2):212-23. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318065a95f.
10
Prosthetic complications with mandibular bar-retained implant overdentures having distal attachments and metal frameworks: A 2- to 12-year retrospective analysis.带有远端附着体和金属支架的下颌杆式固位种植覆盖义齿的修复并发症:一项2至12年的回顾性分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Oct;130(4):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.016. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of 2D miniplates and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture - A clinical study.下颌角骨折中二维微型钢板与三维微型钢板固定的比较评估——一项临床研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2020 Jan-Feb;31(1):134-137. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_885_19.
2
Straight Versus Angulated Abutments on Tilted Implants in Immediate Fixed Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Mandible: A 3-Year Retrospective Comparative Study.直基台与斜基台在即刻固定修复下颌无牙颌中应用的对比:一项为期 3 年的回顾性研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):219-26. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4448.
3
Tilted versus axially placed dental implants: a meta-analysis.
倾斜式与轴向植入牙种植体:一项荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2015 Feb;43(2):149-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 17.
4
Long-term effect of overdenture bar design on peri-implant tissues.覆盖义齿连接杆设计对种植体周围组织的长期影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):1126-31. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2161.
5
Marginal bone loss around tilted implants in comparison to straight implants: a meta-analysis.倾斜种植体与垂直种植体周围边缘骨丧失的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):1576-83.
6
Immediate loading on mandibular edentulous patient with SFI Bar® overdenture.SFI Bar®覆盖义齿在下颌无牙患者中的即刻负重。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Mar;3(1):47-50. doi: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.1.47. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
7
To splint or not to splint oral implants in the implant-supported overdenture therapy? A systematic literature review.是否需要对口腔种植体支持的覆盖义齿治疗中的种植体进行夹板固定?系统文献回顾。
J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Nov;38(11):857-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02220.x. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
8
Immediate loading of two implants with a mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a new treatment protocol.下颌种植体固位覆盖义齿即刻加载两颗种植体:一种新的治疗方案。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Dec;13(4):255-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00210.x. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
9
When to choose which retention element to use for removable dental prostheses.何时为可摘义齿选择使用哪种固位元件。
Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):161-7.
10
Identification of stability changes for immediately placed dental implants.即刻种植的牙种植体稳定性变化的识别
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Jul-Aug;22(4):623-30.